Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
Instead the ntp code adds a delay to the incoming packet timestamp,
and the FPGA H/W sends out the packet at the correct time.
OK, this still means that the host CPU must be involved in every packet.
Yes, in the current implementation.
Line speed is 10M+ packets/s
Part of the requirement, is that the dependencies on the underlying O/S
should be minimized. If an FPGA can handle everything, then this is
ideal.
Currently the FPGA will split incoming packets into streams with one
stream per thread.
Why can't your FPGA do the entire NTP processing, for all r
Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
On 2012-09-14 21:44, Terje Mathisen wrote:
Do you really need that?
It seems to me that by modifying an ethernet card driver to do ntp
processing in kernel mode, you should be able to handle at least the
same number of ntp requests as you can do ping replies.
One of the
On 2012-09-14 21:44, Terje Mathisen wrote:
Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
On 2012-09-12 21:24, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 9/12/2012 2:34 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2012-09-12, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based S/W to test the
throughput of NTP servers?
I.E:
pac
Rick Jones wrote:
Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> wrote:
You're talking 10 GiGE wire speed, right?
That's more than 100 M requests/second!
If I recall correctly, the maximum number of minimim sized frames per
second for 10GbE is something like 14.7M or 14.8M each way. I think
Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> wrote:
> You're talking 10 GiGE wire speed, right?
> That's more than 100 M requests/second!
If I recall correctly, the maximum number of minimim sized frames per
second for 10GbE is something like 14.7M or 14.8M each way. I think
Luigi Rizzo has gott
Ulf,
Please contact me from a working email address.
Sorry to bother everybody else.
--
Harlan Stenn
http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
On 2012-09-12 21:24, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 9/12/2012 2:34 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2012-09-12, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based S/W to test the
throughput of NTP servers?
I.E:
packets per second?
% of lost packets
e
BlackLists wrote:
> Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> I am part of a small team that is evaluating how to
>> replace some existing stratum 1 servers...
>>
>> The NTP server we will be testing will be connected
>> to a Cesium clock providing a 1pps pulse...
>> I want to check if this system can handle DDoS
On 9/14/2012 11:44 AM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> I am part of a small team that is evaluating how to
> replace some existing stratum 1 servers...
On 9/14/2012 11:57 AM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> The NTP server we will be testing will be connected
> to a Cesium clock providing a 1pps pulse...
> I wan
On 2012-09-12 21:24, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
On 9/12/2012 2:34 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2012-09-12, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based S/W to test the
throughput of NTP servers?
I.E:
packets per second?
% of lost packets
etc?
Best Regards
Ulf S
On 2012-09-12 20:34, unruh wrote:
On 2012-09-12, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based S/W to test the
throughput of NTP servers?
I.E:
packets per second?
% of lost packets
etc?
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
I hope not. I can just se
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:28:24PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based S/W to test the
> throughput of NTP servers?
> I.E:
>
> packets per second?
> % of lost packets
> etc?
I've used tcpdump and tcpreplay to measure the maximum pac
On 2012-09-12, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> On 9/12/2012 2:34 PM, unruh wrote:
>> On 2012-09-12, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>> Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based S/W to test the
>>> throughput of NTP servers?
>>> I.E:
>>>
>>> packets per second?
>>> % of lost packets
>>> e
On 9/12/2012 2:34 PM, unruh wrote:
On 2012-09-12, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based S/W to test the
throughput of NTP servers?
I.E:
packets per second?
% of lost packets
etc?
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
I hope not. I can just s
unruh wrote:> Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based
>> S/W to test the throughput of NTP servers? I.E:
>> packets per second?
>> % of lost packets
>> etc?
>>
> I hope not. I can just see someone deciding to test one
> of the stratum 1 main se
On 2012-09-12, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based S/W to test the
> throughput of NTP servers?
> I.E:
>
> packets per second?
> % of lost packets
> etc?
>
> Best Regards
> Ulf Samuelsson
I hope not. I can just see someone deciding to tes
On Sep 12, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based S/W to test the
> throughput of NTP servers?
> I.E:
>
> packets per second?
> % of lost packets
> etc?
To _measure_ those things, I'd probably use tcpdump, possibly plus som
Anyone knows if there are any available Linux based S/W to test the
throughput of NTP servers?
I.E:
packets per second?
% of lost packets
etc?
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http
19 matches
Mail list logo