Hi,
Does anyone else see the following or is it just me? It usually works
fine. I checked latest R-devel commits and couldn't see anything very
recently changed or fixed w.r.t. po/ or Makefile.
wget https://stat.ethz.ch/R/daily/R-devel.tar.gz
tar xvf R-devel.tar.gz
cd R-devel
./configure
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Kevin Ushey wrote:
More generally, I think one of the issues is that R is not yet able to
decrement a reference count (or mark a 'shared' data object as
'unshared' after it knows only one binding to it exists). This means
passing variables to R closures will mark that object
Awesome. Thanks for confirming.
Paul
On 05/09/18 19:46, Edzer Pebesma wrote:
Thanks, Paul -- setting the ~/.fonts.conf file the way ?X11 describes it
under the section you pointed to resolved the problem for me, on ubuntu.
On 09/04/2018 11:55 PM, Paul Murrell wrote:
Hi
Thanks for that,
On 05/09/2018 2:20 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
I take a complementary approach; I condition on, my home-made,
R_TEST_ALL variable. Effectively, I do:
if (as.logical(Sys.getenv("R_TEST_ALL", "FALSE"))) {
...
}
and set R_TEST_ALL=TRUE when I want to run that part of the test. You
can also
Seems ok on my system. Axis label size changes when cex.axis does.
## tested in the middle of another long session, so many additional packages
are attached, including some personal packages not available elsewhere
> sessionInfo()
R version 3.5.1 (2018-07-02)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0
Sounds like an Rcpp question and should be asked on the Rcpp mailing list
http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
Sorry for the run-around!
Martin
On 09/05/2018 02:17 PM, André Luiz Molan wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to create an R package using Rcpp. I am using the
Hi,
I'm trying to create an R package using Rcpp. I am using the "Build" option
from RStudio and roxygen2 package. My package is build with no error
messages and normally loaded. However, when I call a function from the new
package, I have the following message:
*Error in .Call(, x) :
NULL
I take a complementary approach; I condition on, my home-made,
R_TEST_ALL variable. Effectively, I do:
if (as.logical(Sys.getenv("R_TEST_ALL", "FALSE"))) {
...
}
and set R_TEST_ALL=TRUE when I want to run that part of the test. You
can also imagine refined versions of this, e.g.
Hi,
I'm trying to create an R package using Rcpp. I am using the "Build" option
from RStudio and roxygen2 package. My package is build with no error
messages and normally loaded. However, when I call a function from the new
package, I have the following message:
*Error in .Call(, val1) :
NULL
On 2018-09-05 12:52, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:34 PM Spencer Graves
wrote:
The fda package disables some tests on CRAN using:
if(!fda::CRAN()){
test you don't want run on CRAN
}
Seemingly this just checks for a couple of (5 by default) environment
variables that
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:34 PM Spencer Graves
wrote:
>
> The fda package disables some tests on CRAN using:
>
>
> if(!fda::CRAN()){
> test you don't want run on CRAN
> }
Seemingly this just checks for a couple of (5 by default) environment
variables that match "^_R_":
The fda package disables some tests on CRAN using:
if(!fda::CRAN()){
test you don't want run on CRAN
}
I've used this in other contexts with tests that are too long to
run on CRAN but that I want to run otherwise during "R CMD check".
Spencer Graves
On 2018-09-05 12:13,
Hey,
Maybe webmockr (or something alike) can help:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/webmockr/index.html
Best, Peter
Rainer M Krug schrieb am Mi., 5. Sep. 2018, 15:38:
> OK - thanks. I will than disable the checks for CRAN.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rainer
>
>
> > On 5 Sep 2018, at 15:37, Uwe
More generally, I think one of the issues is that R is not yet able to
decrement a reference count (or mark a 'shared' data object as
'unshared' after it knows only one binding to it exists). This means
passing variables to R closures will mark that object as shared:
x <- list()
Your package has been accepted and officially added to the devel version of
Bioconductor. You need to follow the instructions for setting up remotes and
pushing to the git.bioconductor.org server. The webhook may be deactivated and
is only used during the submission process.
We now see the changes on the git.bioconductor.org server. The changes should
be reflected in tomorrows build report.
Cheers,
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
If you didn't set up your remotes this link may be useful
https://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/sync-existing-repositories/
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York
Hello,
I followed every command.
Everything is up to date.
MacBook-Pro:DMCHMM Farhad$ git remote add upstream
g...@git.bioconductor.org:packages/DMCHMM.git
fatal: remote upstream already exists.
MacBook-Pro:DMCHMM Farhad$ git fetch --all
Fetching origin
Fetching upstream
MacBook-Pro:DMCHMM
I noticed today that since release, the web hook has not pushed:
Web hook bar is green, with the message:
can't build unless issue is open and has the '2. review in progress'
label, or is closed and has the 'TESTING' label.
This is for the package ORFik
Have we set up the web hook in the
OK - thanks. I will than disable the checks for CRAN.
Thanks,
Rainer
> On 5 Sep 2018, at 15:37, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
> You should not run on CRAN. Note that the checks are done almost daily oin
> several platforms, hence the API key is used for about 10 check runs a day.
>
> Best,
> Uwe
You should not run on CRAN. Note that the checks are done almost daily
oin several platforms, hence the API key is used for about 10 check runs
a day.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.09.2018 09:28, Rainer Krug wrote:
Hi
I have a package at GitHub (https://github.com/rkrug/ROriginStamp) which I am
Hello,
I did everything mentioned in the link.
I am also using Sourcetree app on Mac to commit changes but noting changes.
Best,
———
Farhad Shokoohi,
Ph.D. in Statistics
shoko...@icloud.com
> On Sep 4, 2018, at 11:59 AM, Obenchain, Valerie
> wrote:
>
> The builds start ~5pm EST daily.
Also remember if you are referring to the Citation that appears on the landing
pages - packages are built once a day and the landing page could take up to 2
days to reflect the CITATION change after you push changes to the
git.bioconductor.org server with a valid version bump.
Lori Shepherd
Thank you very much for the information, Lori!
Best regards with many thanks!
Xiangyu
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 7:45 PM Shepherd, Lori
wrote:
> Also remember if you are referring to the Citation that appears on the
> landing pages - packages are built once a day and the landing page could
>
Dear Martin,
I greatly appreciate your super kind help! I will fix that very carefully.
Thank you so much!
Best regards with many thanks!
Xiangyu
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 7:37 PM Martin Morgan
wrote:
> Please note, there is no CITATION file anywhere in your repository!
>
> Verify this for
Please note, there is no CITATION file anywhere in your repository!
Verify this for yourself, if you like, by changing to a temporary
location and making a new clone of your package
git clone g...@git.bioconductor.org:pacakges/BUScorrect
You have not added it to your local repository, or
Dear Martin,
For version 0.9.9, I inserted a CITATION into the "inst", but it did not
work. Therefore, in version 0.9.10, I took the CITATION file out of the
"inst", but it still did not work. Thank you so much for your patience and
guidance!
Best regards,
Xiangyu
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:20
Dear Levi,
Thanks a lot for your suggestion! I actually have bumped the version
number. I am reading the link you shared to see whether I made mistakes
somewhere.
Best regards,
Xiangyu
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:18 PM Levi Waldron
wrote:
> And don't forget to bump your version number, and to
after I
git clone g...@git.bioconductor.org:packages/BUScorrect
This is the log that I see
BUScorrect master$ git log --name-only -n 2
commit 5ccfa7ce4f665f3ffbc55b26a5cd81beaafd3293
Author: Xiangyu Luo
Date: Fri Aug 31 19:10:32 2018 +0800
version bump
DESCRIPTION
commit
Dear Martin,
Thank you very much for the information! I have pushed my changes, bumped
the version, and waited for a successful nightly build, but the citation
result did not change. I am wondering whether the CITATION file should be
in "inst" folder?
Best,
Xiangyu
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at
The bottomline here is that one can always call a base method,
inexpensively and without modifying the object, in, let's say,
*formal* OOP languages. In R, this is not possible in general. It
would be possible if there was always a foo.default, but primitives
use internal dispatch.
I was
On 08/24/2018 07:55 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Is there a low-level function that returns the length of an object 'x'
- the length that for instance .subset(x) and .subset2(x) see? An
obvious candidate would be to use:
.length <- function(x) length(unclass(x))
However, I'm concerned that
Thanks, Paul -- setting the ~/.fonts.conf file the way ?X11 describes it
under the section you pointed to resolved the problem for me, on ubuntu.
On 09/04/2018 11:55 PM, Paul Murrell wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for that, but I still cannot confirm on ...
>
> sudo docker run -v $(pwd):/home/work/ -w
Hi
I have a package at GitHub (https://github.com/rkrug/ROriginStamp) which I am
pre[paring for CRAN.
It creates a trusted timestamp using the API fro OriginStamp
(https://originstamp.org/home) which requires an API key. Now this API should
not be made public, as to much traffic through one
34 matches
Mail list logo
