Dear all, I am fitting a LOGIT model on this Data...
Data - structure(c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1,
0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 47, 58, 82, 100, 222, 164, 161, 70, 219, 81,
209, 182, 185, 104, 126, 192, 95, 245,
Christofer Bogaso bogaso.christofer at gmail.com writes:
Dear all, I am fitting a LOGIT model on this Data...
snip ---
glm(Data[,1] ~ Data[,-1], binomial(link = logit))
Call: glm(formula = Data[, 1] ~ Data[, -1], family = binomial(link = logit))
Coefficients:
(Intercept)
Thanks Ken for your reply. No doubt your english is quite tough!! I
understand something is not normal with the 5th explanatory variable
(se:2872.17069!) However could not understand what you mean by You
seem to be getting complete separation on X5 ?
Can you please be more elaborate?
Thanks,
On
You should look up the Hauck-Donne phenomenon, which shows that
with binomial GLMs, the standard error can grow faster than
the effect size. Complete separation results, for example,
when one predictor (or a combination of several predictors)
perfectly predicts the response. Something like this
4 matches
Mail list logo