Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-06 Thread Tom Callaway
On 06/04/2016 12:10 PM, Evan Cooch wrote: > Updated my R install on my GNU/Linux boxes (running CentOS 6.8) from > 3.2.x -> 3.3.0, using latest from epel (i.e., not compiling from > source), and while said upgrade seemed to go fine, am now (post-upgrade) > having all sorts of problems with getting

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-06 Thread Evan Cooch
Thanks very much. I had more or less reached the same conclusions -- I was just about to rebuild RPMs for source for zlib, etc, and update those, and try again, but I've had mixed success in doing that in past. Its easy enough to roll back to 3.2.5 (which compiles perfectly against all the Cent

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-06 Thread Tom Callaway
On 06/06/2016 10:00 AM, Evan Cooch wrote: > Thanks very much. I had more or less reached the same conclusions -- I > was just about to rebuild RPMs for source for zlib, etc, and update > those, and try again, but I've had mixed success in doing that in past. > Its easy enough to roll back to 3.2.5

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-06 Thread Evan Cooch
Understood. Thanks for the feedback. On 6/6/2016 10:04 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: On 06/06/2016 10:00 AM, Evan Cooch wrote: Thanks very much. I had more or less reached the same conclusions -- I was just about to rebuild RPMs for source for zlib, etc, and update those, and try again, but I've had

[R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-06 Thread Brian Fallik
Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a thread if I'm not subscribed. We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I can confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5 does address the build failure. Will 3.3.0-5 make it into EPEL? If so, do you have any idea