Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-09 Thread Tom Callaway
No, that's the correct fix. Another round of new packages will appear later this morning. The libraries it is referencing are linked statically into R, so they are not supposed to be present. ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-09 Thread Gordon Ball
Brian Fallik writes: > > Hi Tom, > > I'm seeing another similar build failure with the recent 3.3.0-5 and I'm a > bit stumped about what's going on. > > On a fresh VM, after installing 3.3.0-5 and then running: > install.packages(c("lpSolveAPI), method="curl", repos=" >

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-08 Thread Brian Fallik
Hi Tom, I'm seeing another similar build failure with the recent 3.3.0-5 and I'm a bit stumped about what's going on. On a fresh VM, after installing 3.3.0-5 and then running: install.packages(c("lpSolveAPI), method="curl", repos=" https://cran.rstudio.com;) the build fails with: gcc:

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-07 Thread Evan Cooch
On 6/7/2016 11:46 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a thread if I'm not subscribed. We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I can confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-07 Thread Brian Fallik
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-07 Thread Tom Callaway
On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I can > confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5 does address the build failure. Will

[R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-06 Thread Brian Fallik
Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a thread if I'm not subscribed. We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I can confirm that updated to 3.3.0-5 does address the build failure. Will 3.3.0-5 make it into EPEL? If so, do you have any

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-06 Thread Evan Cooch
Understood. Thanks for the feedback. On 6/6/2016 10:04 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: On 06/06/2016 10:00 AM, Evan Cooch wrote: Thanks very much. I had more or less reached the same conclusions -- I was just about to rebuild RPMs for source for zlib, etc, and update those, and try again, but I've had

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-06 Thread Tom Callaway
On 06/06/2016 10:00 AM, Evan Cooch wrote: > Thanks very much. I had more or less reached the same conclusions -- I > was just about to rebuild RPMs for source for zlib, etc, and update > those, and try again, but I've had mixed success in doing that in past. > Its easy enough to roll back to 3.2.5

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-06 Thread Evan Cooch
Thanks very much. I had more or less reached the same conclusions -- I was just about to rebuild RPMs for source for zlib, etc, and update those, and try again, but I've had mixed success in doing that in past. Its easy enough to roll back to 3.2.5 (which compiles perfectly against all the

[R-sig-Fedora] problems compiling packages | 3.3.0 | Linux

2016-06-04 Thread Evan Cooch
Updated my R install on my GNU/Linux boxes (running CentOS 6.8) from 3.2.x -> 3.3.0, using latest from epel (i.e., not compiling from source), and while said upgrade seemed to go fine, am now (post-upgrade) having all sorts of problems with getting some (but not all) packages to compile