That's not quite topic drift so much as skidding a thread sideways into the
grave.
Philip
www.biketinker.com
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 3:00:23 PM UTC-8, Steve Palincsar wrote:
On 11/17/2013 05:41 PM, Patrick Moore wrote:
Moving on: one huge problem afflicting the Northern army was
Hi David,
The link clicking on today's installment really shows the blogger's colors.
He apparently believes there should be criminal prosecution when a
motorist has a wreck with a cyclist. There is no criminal prosecution when
a motorist kills another motorist - by accident, by definition -
EXTREME topics drift! I know, right?
McClellan coming up in a Gettysburg reference?! LMFAO! McClellan was long
gone by the time Gettysburg was being fought. LOLOLOL!!!
On Monday, November 18, 2013 1:39:56 AM UTC-8, Philip Williamson wrote:
That's not quite topic drift so much as
actually, he was campaigning for president then.
On Monday, November 18, 2013 10:20:12 AM UTC-6, Bill Lindsay wrote:
EXTREME topics drift! I know, right?
McClellan coming up in a Gettysburg reference?! LMFAO! McClellan was
long gone by the time Gettysburg was being fought.
he was already campaigning in july of '63? tell me more
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
this is the last forum I expected to become the Bullwinkle Show.
On Monday, November 18, 2013 11:15:21 AM UTC-6, Bill Lindsay wrote:
he was already campaigning in july of '63? tell me more
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
He has a specific perspective he's coming from. This is a regular topic for
him, and a lot of time it's the absence of any investigation or even a
citation from NYPD for the driver.
On Monday, November 18, 2013 5:15:04 AM UTC-8, Ron Mc wrote:
Hi David,
The link clicking on today's
Right on target Ron.
~Hughworks on keeping his ego in check, and can't really contribute to
such nonsense Smitham
On Saturday, November 16, 2013 6:21:02 AM UTC-8, Ron Mc wrote:
sarcasm never comes across right on the internet - also, if you love
somebody, no sarcasm - it transliterates as
On 11/17/2013 02:17 AM, Philip Williamson wrote:
Hey!
No name calling.
Yes, as used here -- the legacy of BSNYC and Richard Sachs --
re-enactment is nothing more than name calling, a way to mock and
insult. Such crap.
Today's Washington Post Outlook section has a story about Gettysburg
God.
Moving on: one huge problem afflicting the Northern army was McClellan, who
had delusions of grandeur combined with a fear of fighting. Anecdote:
Lincoln and friend Ozias Hatch were on a bluff overlooking the Army of the
Potomac. Lincoln leaned over and whispered, Hatch: What is that!?
On 11/17/2013 05:41 PM, Patrick Moore wrote:
Moving on: one huge problem afflicting the Northern army was
McClellan, who had delusions of grandeur combined with a fear of
fighting. Anecdote:
Lincoln and friend Ozias Hatch were on a bluff overlooking the Army of
the Potomac. Lincoln leaned
sarcasm never comes across right on the internet - also, if you love
somebody, no sarcasm - it transliterates as putrefying thought, and that is
what it does.
On Friday, November 15, 2013 4:54:55 PM UTC-6, Patrick Moore wrote:
Hey, I missed this one. How do you dremel a Longboard into a
I don't think BSNYC's quips putrefy anything. Apparently, neither does
Grant. BS comes across as facetiously grumpy and misanthropic -- the key
word being facetiously.
To quote H L Mencken: A belly laugh is worth 10,000 syllogisms.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Ron Mc bulldog...@gmail.com
On 11/16/2013 10:49 AM, Patrick Moore wrote:
I don't think BSNYC's quips putrefy anything. Apparently, neither does
Grant. BS comes across as facetiously grumpy and misanthropic -- the
key word being facetiously.
IMHO words and phrases like fop chariot and reenactment embody
putrefaction.
I prefer Historically accurate fop chariot.
If you haven't read it, Monday's installment was perfect BTW:
http://bikesnobnyc.blogspot.com/2013/11/shafted-again.html He does use
some earthy language.
On 11/16/13, Steve Palincsar palin...@his.com wrote:
On 11/16/2013 10:49 AM, Patrick Moore
I rode my historically inaccurate fop chariot on a 20 mi ride this morning
(only bike I own with gears I can climb back into my neighborhood)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v728/bulldog1935/Raleigh/aP4140012.jpg
with the small trunksack mounted in place of the rando bag. I've mentioned
Yeah! The right words count!
Patrick Moore, getting a kick out of this thread in ABQ, NM
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.comwrote:
I prefer Historically accurate fop chariot.
If you haven't read it, Monday's installment was perfect BTW:
Nice bike -- I wish I could be comfortable on M bars. Are the new ones very
different in feel?
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Ron Mc bulldog...@gmail.com wrote:
I rode my historically inaccurate fop chariot on a 20 mi ride this morning
(only bike I own with gears I can climb back into my
thanks Patrick. Even with all the weight, my old college Raleigh is trick
for me. Wide 6 rear and half-steps plus escape on a Cylotouriste crank.
Gears are 26 to 97 in about 5-inch steps. I think it's cozy for me
because of my long limbs and short torso, but it fits me like a pair of
Anton Tutter wrote:
I would love to read BikeSnobNYC's take on of all this.
I expect he has run into this sort of reaction before.
BSNYC might allow for the possibility it is written tongue-in-cheek, just
as he writes. He even may be sufficiently perceptive to think, Small group
of
I see, so no commenting on your own blog but you can comment here on
peoples comments on said blog. What a hypocrite.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:56 AM, OS125 cbarb...@ase.tufts.edu wrote:
Anton Tutter wrote:
I would love to read BikeSnobNYC's take on of all this.
I expect he has run into
Think of all the angst and implied insult you could have avoided simply
by describing your hack as a way to emulate or recreate the look of the
old Bluemels fender while using cheap and readily available modern fenders.
I think in future it would be nice to reserve the term re-enactors for
I think it would be cool if SKS offered modern fenders in all the colors
that Bluemels (sp?) used to offer. That would be super fun.
On Thursday, November 14, 2013 8:31:49 AM UTC-8, Anton Tutter wrote:
Has anyone seen this?
Hey, I missed this one. How do you dremel a Longboard into a Bluemel?
Anyone who takes cutting tools to bicycle stuff is my friend!
It is interesting that BS's sarcasm seems to be spread with a pretty even
hand, in a full 360 degrees, too.
Patrick must search my trash folder for this one -- no,
This seems applicable. http://xkcd.com/386/
With abandon,
Patrick
On Thursday, November 14, 2013 9:31:49 AM UTC-7, Anton Tutter wrote:
Has anyone seen this?
http://v-ccnewengland.blogspot.com/2011/03/sks-longboard-fenders-improved.html
The author explicitly expresses his distaste of these
I like the bar and stem shifter combination on his prewar Evans
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_uyGpYXb0Jro/TTtxtIAWUtI/AMs/QYm6dCLwbtU/s1600/IMG_7300.jpg
I don't know if you've ever visited the CABE - none of those guys actually
ride bikes - they just memorialize them
On Thursday, November
On Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:47:18 AM UTC-5, Ron Mc wrote:
I like the bar and stem shifter combination on his prewar Evans
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_uyGpYXb0Jro/TTtxtIAWUtI/AMs/QYm6dCLwbtU/s1600/IMG_7300.jpg
It's also sporting a Riv bottle.
I don't know if you've ever
27 matches
Mail list logo
