Re: [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised

2012-04-27 Thread newenglandbike
There is also a Riv blog post about the Hilsen tubeset here: http://rivbike.tumblr.com/post/3218082349/the-t-question-long-post-dry-reading The Homer is made with these tubes, if made in Wisconsin: Seat tube: True Temper Verus heat-treated CrMo. HT CrMo generally ends up with a tensile

Re: [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised

2012-04-27 Thread newenglandbike
Continued. The chainstays are OX PLAT, with the odd wall thickness of 0.76mm. Normal would be 0.7 to 0.9, with 0.8 being really common, but these are 0.76. Odd, but fine. They’re good chainstays. The seat stays are Reynolds double-tapered HT CrMo (725). TruTemp doesn’t make double-tapered

Re: [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised

2012-04-27 Thread Leslie
FWIW: While chatting w/ Riv folks awaiting my Bomba's arrival, they told me a lot about how its built. The diagonal mid-tube is the same as the top tube; and the seat tube is also the same tubing, which gets sized (why it has a 26.8 instead of a 27.2 seatpost); those and the downtube are all

Re: [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised

2012-04-27 Thread Bruce Herbitter
I meant to send this to the list. Saluki is not identical, iirc, but is similar. Maybe someone from RBW can chime in on that. On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Bruce Herbitter bruce.herbit...@gmail.comwrote: Down tube: Tohouku-Miyata Heat Treated double butted 31.8 .8/.5/.8 through 66CM 68

Re: [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised

2012-04-27 Thread Marty
Not all Bombas take a 26.8. Mine (an early Diagaversion) uses 27.2, which thankfully allowed the use of the Nitto lugged set-back post. Could very well be that all current and future Bombas will be like yours Leslie. I even seem to recall that the 26.8 post was the original plan. (I even had a

Re: [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised

2012-04-27 Thread cyclotour...@gmail.com
Forget the tubing, somebody needs to buy this custom frame! What a great bike!!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/eHlTYWuN17wJ.

Re: [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised

2012-04-27 Thread Leslie
Not a one-off, it was, and will be again. For the moment, on the current Bomba (and the Hunq too, I think), the reason some are using the 26.8 is because they're using the stouter top-tube for the seat tube, until they get another tube for use for the seat tube that will allow the 27.2

Re: [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised

2012-04-27 Thread Jim
I bet the reason is the steel was actually rolled to inch dimensions, which would be 0.030, a common thickness that is basically the same as 0.76mm Jim in Boulder On Friday, April 27, 2012 2:33:47 AM UTC-6, newenglandbike wrote: .. The chainstays are OX PLAT, with the odd wall thickness of

Re: [RBW] Re: FS: 59cm Joe/Joe Longlow revised

2012-04-26 Thread Bruce Herbitter
At times RBW gives tube specs but usially not. Ram specs are published. You can search this list archives because i posted themwithin the last year. Or emsil me and ill send yhem from a device i can actually type on. Sent from my Kindle Fire