[RDA-L] ALCTS CaMMS Copy Cataloging Interest Group ALA Midwinter

2013-01-11 Thread Hunter,Nancy
Apologies for duplicate postings! You are invited to join the ALCTS CaMMS Copy Cataloging Interest Group on Saturday, January 26, 8:30-10:00 AM at the Renaissance Seattle Hotel - Compass South. Angela Kinney, Chief, African, Latin American Western European Division, Library of Congress will

Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields

2013-01-11 Thread Arakawa, Steven
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:15 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields From: Resource Description and

Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields

2013-01-11 Thread Deborah Fritz
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Arakawa, Steven Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 10:39 AM [SA]if you have a bracketed date in 264 _1 based on the copyright date, the 264 _4 is optional, if I'm interpreting

Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields

2013-01-11 Thread Jack Wu
I do not know if LC PCC PS is interpreted correctly. However, RDA 2.8.6.6 says If the date of publication is not identified in a resource... record the copyright date, and RDA 2.11 says copyright date is a core element if...neither the date of publication ... is identified. I tend to think in

Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields

2013-01-11 Thread Adam L. Schiff
Transcription of copyright date is a core element (Mandatory) if neither the date of publication nor the date of distribution is identified. This is why the LC-PCC Policy Statement tells catalogers to supply a probable publication date as much as possible, rather than recording date of

Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields

2013-01-11 Thread Monica Boyer
A slight tangent from the conversation: In the interest of trying to learn about the 264 in RDA, I looked at the MARC Bibliographic to RDA Mapping in the RDA Toolkit, the 264 isn't there. Likewise, perhaps more surprisingly, the 264 also isn't in the RDA to MARC Bibliographic Mapping. Please

Re: [RDA-L] Language of supplied place of publication?

2013-01-11 Thread Deborah Fritz
1.4 Language and Script http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp1target=rda1-523#rda1-5 23 says: When recording an element listed above as a supplied element, record the supplied element in the most appropriate language and script. Place of publication is one of the elements

Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields

2013-01-11 Thread John Hostage
There is something strangely circular about the LC-PCC PS's. This is partly due to the fact that they leave a wide window open for confusion about what it means for a date of publication, etc., to be identified. To me that does not mean filling in a subfield with substitute information based

Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields

2013-01-11 Thread Harden, Jean
I was just looking at that. I believe that the problem is that the Toolkit hasn't yet been updated to reflect the existence of 264. The MARC21 Bibliographic Format on Cataloger's Desktop was just updated very recently to include it. Until a few days ago, the only place to find it was on the LC

Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields

2013-01-11 Thread Deborah Fritz
264 is not mentioned in the mapping appendices in the Toolkit because the those appendices are in the process of being updated. - - - - - - - - Deborah Fritz TMQ, Inc. mailto:debo...@marcofquality.com debo...@marcofquality.com http://www.marcofquality.com www.marcofquality.com