I do not know if LC PCC PS is interpreted correctly. However, RDA 2.8.6.6 says "If the date of publication is not identified in a resource... record the copyright date, and RDA 2.11 says "copyright date is a core element if...neither the date of publication ... is identified. I tend to think in this case, copyright date, being the only date identified from the resource, is perhaps not optional? Jack Jack Wu Franciscan University of Steubenville
>>> Deborah Fritz <debo...@marcofquality.com> 1/11/2013 10:49 AM >>> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Arakawa, Steven Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 10:39 AM [SA]<if you have a bracketed date in 264 _1 based on the copyright date, the 264 _4 is optional, if I’m interpreting LC PCC PS correctly> [DF:] Yes, if you use the copyright date to supply the date in 264_1, then adding the copyright date is optional, but I think it is a good thing to add it, as long as the copyright date is straightforward. Deborah - - - - - - - - Deborah Fritz TMQ, Inc. debo...@marcofquality.com www.marcofquality.com Scanned by for virus, malware and spam by SCM appliance
