-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Santos Muñoz,
Ricardo
Sent: February-28-13 6:56 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Multiple identities named on same
This is the message I received:
[cid:image001.jpg@01CE158C.008983E0]
inline: image001.jpg
Alex -I believe the working address is lists...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.caKarenFrom: "Simons, Alex" acsim...@uh.edu To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 9:17 AM Subject: [RDA-L] Signoff for RDA-L
This is the message I received:
John Hostage said:
The MARC formats allow the encoding of metadata according to various
standards, but I think if you are creating an RDA record you would
use the RDA vocabularies.
Library and Archives Canada (LAC) has said that they intend to use $4
MARC relator codes, as opposed to $e RDA
I am probably just missing it, but I cannot find the RDA instruction that
tells us to make a Variant Access Point using the other name used in
association with a work; i.e., where does it say *in RDA* to make the 400,
in the Authority Record example that Adam sent:
-
A real life
Deborah:
See 6.27.4.1
Construct additional variant access points if considered important for
access.
Fast, Howard, 1914-2003. Sylvia
Authorized access point for the work: Cunningham, E. V., 1914-2003.
Sylvia.
Novel originally published under the pseudonym E.V. Cunningham; authors
real
I have a question regarding the new instruction 16.2.2.11 on overseas
territories, dependencies, etc. that is included in 6JSC/ALA/19/Sec final
(online at http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-ALA-19-Sec-final.pdf).
Does this instruction change the way that the access points for the
British Crown
I don't see a reply to this post, so I'll give it a go.
Joan Wang jw...@illinoisheartland.org wrote:
Is there a note order requirement in RDA?
Nope. At least, not in the main body of RDA.
I searched RDA Toolkit and found
Order of Elements in Appendix D.1 ISBD Presentation (LC PCC PS). There
J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
Todaka said:
We are working on an RDA record for a compilation of columns selected
from the Science Scope journal. We wanted to provide an access point
for Science Scope in 730 field.
The recently added $4prv Provider seems right to me. If the journal
Michael Borries michael.borr...@mail.cuny.edu wrote:
At this point is it considered necessary in fields 336-338 to use both
subfield $a with the term spelled out and also subfield $b with the code, or
is subfield $a with the term spelled out sufficient? I seem to see both
usages in various
J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
I said:
We need a $e term and $4 code for contributor.
Could someone with the appropriate skills and connections propose the
addition of contributor to RDA relationship terms ...
It's already in RDA: see 20.2. It's just not explicitly listed in RDA
11 matches
Mail list logo