Re: [RDA-L] Multiple identities named on same manifestation

2013-02-28 Thread Brenndorfer, Thomas
-Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Santos Muñoz, Ricardo Sent: February-28-13 6:56 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Multiple identities named on same

[RDA-L] Signoff for RDA-L

2013-02-28 Thread Simons, Alex
This is the message I received: [cid:image001.jpg@01CE158C.008983E0] inline: image001.jpg

Re: [RDA-L] Signoff for RDA-L

2013-02-28 Thread Karen Anspach
Alex -I believe the working address is lists...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.caKarenFrom: "Simons, Alex" acsim...@uh.edu To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 9:17 AM Subject: [RDA-L] Signoff for RDA-L This is the message I received:

Re: [RDA-L] ISBD Area 0 content terms

2013-02-28 Thread J. McRee Elrod
John Hostage said: The MARC formats allow the encoding of metadata according to various standards, but I think if you are creating an RDA record you would use the RDA vocabularies. Library and Archives Canada (LAC) has said that they intend to use $4 MARC relator codes, as opposed to $e RDA

Re: [RDA-L] Multiple identities named on same manifestation

2013-02-28 Thread Deborah Fritz
I am probably just missing it, but I cannot find the RDA instruction that tells us to make a Variant Access Point using the other name used in association with a work; i.e., where does it say *in RDA* to make the 400, in the Authority Record example that Adam sent: - A real life

Re: [RDA-L] Multiple identities named on same manifestation

2013-02-28 Thread Adam L. Schiff
Deborah: See 6.27.4.1 Construct additional variant access points if considered important for access. Fast, Howard, 1914-2003. Sylvia Authorized access point for the work: Cunningham, E. V., 1914-2003. Sylvia. Novel originally published under the pseudonym E.V. Cunningham; authors real

[RDA-L] Question on 16.2.2.11

2013-02-28 Thread Adam L. Schiff
I have a question regarding the new instruction 16.2.2.11 on overseas territories, dependencies, etc. that is included in 6JSC/ALA/19/Sec final (online at http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-ALA-19-Sec-final.pdf). Does this instruction change the way that the access points for the British Crown

Re: [RDA-L] note order in RDA

2013-02-28 Thread M. E.
I don't see a reply to this post, so I'll give it a go. Joan Wang jw...@illinoisheartland.org wrote: Is there a note order requirement in RDA? Nope. At least, not in the main body of RDA. I searched RDA Toolkit and found Order of Elements in Appendix D.1 ISBD Presentation (LC PCC PS). There

Re: [RDA-L] relationship designator between two aggregate works

2013-02-28 Thread M. E.
J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote: Todaka said: We are working on an RDA record for a compilation of columns selected from the Science Scope journal. We wanted to provide an access point for Science Scope in 730 field. The recently added $4prv Provider seems right to me. If the journal

Re: [RDA-L] Use of subfield $b in 336, 337, 338

2013-02-28 Thread M. E.
Michael Borries michael.borr...@mail.cuny.edu wrote: At this point is it considered necessary in fields 336-338 to use both subfield $a with the term spelled out and also subfield $b with the code, or is subfield $a with the term spelled out sufficient? I seem to see both usages in various

Re: [RDA-L] Relators for contributors and consultants (fwd)

2013-02-28 Thread M. E.
J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote: I said: We need a $e term and $4 code for contributor. Could someone with the appropriate skills and connections propose the addition of contributor to RDA relationship terms ... It's already in RDA: see 20.2. It's just not explicitly listed in RDA