[RDA-L] German and French texts of RDA

2013-05-15 Thread Heidrun Wiesenmüller
You'll probably have heard that the German and French translations of RDA were to appear with yesterday's (or rather, yesternight's?) update of the RDA toolkit. In case you wonder where they are: To see them, you'll have to go to your profile and change the language setting from "browser defaul

Re: [RDA-L] German and French texts of RDA

2013-05-15 Thread M. E.
Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote: > Actually, I had hoped for an easier way to switch between languages. Even > better would have been a possibility to directly compare e.g. the English > and the German version (perhaps by having both texts in two different > windows at the same time). As the translati

Re: [RDA-L] German and French texts of RDA

2013-05-15 Thread Mahmoud Khalifa
This is good news, and we hope to see RDA in more languages. For us in Arab libraries community, we eager to see RDA in Arabic, but ALA may have different opinion!! As I know, some Arabic organizations asked for Arabic translation of RDA, but ALA have no response. We hope to hear good news ab

Re: [RDA-L] German and French texts of RDA

2013-05-15 Thread Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Mark, Yes, that had occured to me as well (although it's a bit of a laugh if you have to use the Toolkit this way). Also, the links do not work in the PDF documents (or at least, I haven't found a way to make them work), so it will be really clumsy to use. Heidrun Mark wrote: Heidrun Wies

Re: [RDA-L] GMD Designator Searching with RDA

2013-05-15 Thread M. E.
Payne, Ophelia (omp2w) wrote: > I know there was a long discussion last week about the 336, 337 and 338 > fields for RDA and I was trying to see if my question was addressed. My > question is--- with the elimination of the GMD designator for > videorecordings, sound recordings, etc., how would

[RDA-L] Cambridge University RDA materials

2013-05-15 Thread C.J. Carty
The Cambridge RDA Steering Group is pleased to announce that it is making available all of its RDA documentation and training materials under a Creative Commons CC-BY licence for anyone to reuse or adapt. Our intranet is not publicly accessible so we have created a separate website for this doc

Re: [RDA-L] RDA 2.8 through 2.10, and Core status

2013-05-15 Thread Deborah Fritz
I asked LChelp4rda this same question last year. LC's reply was that we must remember that implicit in the definition of 'Core' is the 1.3 wording: "elements that are applicable and readily ascertainable" Quoting from the LC reply: "So, for a published resource, date of publication is applicable

Re: [RDA-L] RDA 2.8 through 2.10, and Core status

2013-05-15 Thread Kevin M Randall
Mac Elrod wrote: > > 264 #1 $a [Earth] : $b [Publisher of (name of the work)], $c [not > before 1992] > > You are kidding right? Yes, I was kidding on that one. Sorry I forgot the smiley face! Kevin

Re: [RDA-L] What is the appropriate RDA element for a term like "Board book" or "Scented book"

2013-05-15 Thread Deborah Fritz
Data entered as 6.12 (Other Distinguishing Characteristic of the Expression) always has to be entered with the expectation that it could be added as a qualifier to an Authorized Access Point. With that proviso, once (if) we start thinking about how to differentiate different expressions, it is

[RDA-L] Relator terms - Clerical contributions

2013-05-15 Thread Northrup, Kristen D.
What is the most appropriate relator term for the individual who prepares a scientific report for publication? Getting all the illustrations and tables to line up properly, proofreading, etc. This researcher always includes his typist right under his own name on the title page, as project assist

Re: [RDA-L] What is the appropriate RDA element for a term like "Board book" or "Scented book"

2013-05-15 Thread Bonnie Dede
Neil, Did you see this one? On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Deborah Fritz wrote: > Data entered as 6.12 (Other Distinguishing Characteristic of the > Expression) always has to be entered with the expectation that it could be > added as a qualifier to an Authorized Access Point. > > With that p

[RDA-L] RDA 6.27.1.9 Additions to access points representing works (LC PCC PS)

2013-05-15 Thread Jennifer W. Baxmeyer
Hi everyone, RDA 6.27.1.9 states: Make additions to access points if needed to distinguish the access point for a work: from one that is the same or similar but represents a different work or from one that represents a person, family, corporate body, or place. The LC PCC-PS for 6.27.1.9 shows t

Re: [RDA-L] GMD Designator Searching with RDA

2013-05-15 Thread J. McRee Elrod
>--- with the elimination of the GMD designator for videorecordings, s= >ound recordings, etc., how would you limit your search if you wanted to get= > only DVDs? In the MARC world we have this capability but I haven't been a= >ble to figure this out with RDA. Any suggestions? A simple solution

Re: [RDA-L] GMD Designator Searching with RDA

2013-05-15 Thread Myers, John F.
Can the question be clarified? DVD is not an aspect reflected in the GMD. Nor are search limits by record type or specific format usually driven by the GMD but instead by the coding in the fixed field or field 007. Both of these fields are still employable in MARC records conveying RDA data.

Re: [RDA-L] RDA 6.27.1.9 Additions to access points representing works (LC PCC PS)

2013-05-15 Thread Robert Maxwell
It is, in fact, permissible to include the language of expression in the access point for an expression, even if it is the original language. Libraries may choose to use the authorized access point for the work to represent the first expression, as LC does in LCPS 6.27.3: 100

Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms - Clerical contributions

2013-05-15 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Kristen asked: >What is the most appropriate relator term for the individual who >prepares a scientific report for publication? Getting all the >illustrations and tables to line up properly, proofreading, etc. The simplist would be $4edt or $eeditor. Both $4 and $e are repeating, so you can use

[RDA-L] Appropriate Use of Headings for Fictitious Characters

2013-05-15 Thread Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger
Fellow Colleagues: In the RDA Toolkit, Chapter 9.0 states:     "The preferred name for the person is used as the basis for the authorized access point. The variant name or names for the person are used as the bas

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Use of Headings for Fictitious Characters

2013-05-15 Thread Robert Maxwell
Thea Stilton is a fictitious character, but RDA 9.0 explicitly includes fictious characters ("Persons include fictitious entities, such as literary figures, legendary figures, etc."). So if a fictitious character presents himself or herself as the creator of a resource or a contributor to an ex

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Use of Headings for Fictitious Characters

2013-05-15 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Lynne LaBare posted: >"The preferred name for the person is used as the basis for the >authorized access point. The variant name or names for the person are >used as the basis for variant access points" -- RDA toolkit Seems to me this could be read to mean you could have two entries for the

Re: [RDA-L] RDA 6.27.1.9 Additions to access points representing works (LC PCC PS)

2013-05-15 Thread Adam L. Schiff
Some time ago, I pointed out to PSD that the example in the Appendix you cite is not in line with the example elsewhere in LC-PCC PS 6.27.3: 700 12 $a Macken, JoAnn Early, $d 1953- $t Mail carrier. 700 12 $a Macken, JoAnn Early, $d 1953- $t Mail carrier. $l Spanish. It looks like they haven't

[RDA-L] Getting Started with RDA: A CIG pop-up workshop

2013-05-15 Thread Hunt, Stuart
Getting Started with RDA: A CIG pop-up workshop 3rd July 2013, University of Warwick The CILIP Cataloguing and Indexing Group is pleased to announce a new workshop aimed at helping libraries migrate to RDA. If you are planning to adopt Resource Description and Access (RDA), or just thinking abou