Julie Moore asks:
in the instance where I am pretty sure that the item was published in 2013, but
there is no hint of a date anywhere ... is it OK for the cataloger to record:
246 _1 $a xxx : $b yyy : $c [2013?]
--
1.9.2.3 Probable Ye
I assume Jack's questions relate to working on OCLC, which we don't
do. I assume the answers would depend on the library's enghance
status. If status allows, I would say yes in most cases.
For local editing, my opinion:
>When one finds an RDA record that has one mentioned author and others
>u
John F, Myers posted:
>EXAMPLE
> [between 1846 and 1853?]
> [between 1800 and 1899?]
> [between 1970 and 1979?]
> [between 1400 and 1600?]
These Anglo centrc phrases will not fly for non English languge materials
in non English language catalogues. The AACR2 [194-?], [18-
Julie,
Not sure why you are having trouble finding the RDA instructions. See 1.9
Dates.
^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
asch...@u.washington.edu
htt
Thanks, John ... this helps.
As a follow up question ...
in the instance where I am pretty sure that the item was published in 2013,
but there is no hint of a date anywhere ... is it OK for the cataloger to
record:
246 _1 $a xxx : $b yyy : $c [2013?]
Thanks kindly for your patience,
Julie
On
Hi,
When one finds an RDA record that has one mentioned author and others
unmentioned, can one complete the enumeration?
When relationship designators are missing, can one add them?
When publication date is present but not copyright date, can one add it?
When 33x fields have $a but not $b, can one
Julie Moore wrote:
Yes, it was the [197-?] scenario that I was thinking of, where there is nothing
that tells you any kind of a date ... but you have the feeling that it was
probably made in the 70s ... possibly just based on your own experience. I've
been searching all over the place in RDA tr
Julie Moore wrote:
Follow up question ... why is it that I see the majority of RDA records with
multiple 264s having the 264 _1 (publication) and 264 _4?
Is this because the only date they have is a copyright date ... so they put the
publisher info in the 264 _1 $a and $b and sometimes $c [copyri
A tiny question is about the capitalization. Is it upper-case like [Place
of publication not identified] and [Publisher not identified], or
lower-case?
Thanks for your help.
Joan Wang
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Paradis Daniel
wrote:
> According to LC's training material, a date such as "
What I'm wondering, not just about the 264 field, but adding of
information that is not required.
For instance:
When one finds an RDA record that has one mentioned author and others
unmentioned, can one complete the enumeration?
When relationship designators are missing, can one add them?
When publ
10 matches
Mail list logo
