Re: [RDA-L] Varying form of publisher's name on t.p./t.p. verso

Trina, This is one of the most logical, clear, direct explanation of a concept in RDA that I have ever heard or read. I know this is a simple thing for most people, but for some of us struggling to understand and implement these new rules, either because we don't actually get to use it every da

[RDA-L] published or not published?

Please excuse the cross-posting... Hi, I have never had a good grasp on what constitutes something being published or not published. I'm especially confused about the differences between "production," "distribution," and "manufacture." I've looked at the RDA rules and OCLC's Bib Formats and St

Re: [RDA-L] relator terms for works and expressions

Adam, Thanks very much. Obviously I wasn't sure I could mix relator codes for different FRBR levels in that way. I appreciate your help. Chris -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of A

Re: [RDA-L] Request to check RDA record for provider-neutral e-book

I'm sure you already know about this, but in case you don't: www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/scs/documents/PN-RDA-Combined.docx Chris Fox Catalog Librarian McKay Library Brigham Young Univ.-Idaho c...@byui.edu From: Resourc

Re: [RDA-L] Using 344-347?

I've been told that, for now, information in the 34X fields can and should continue to be duplicated in the 007 and the 538 (NTSC or PAL, etc.), until such time as ILSs catch up. So in the limited RDA A/V cataloging I have done, everything that I'm putting in 34X is also somewhere else in the M

Re: [RDA-L] Retrospective conversion of data

stern.edu> voice: 847/491-2788 fax: 847/491-8306 Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit. BatchCat version: 2007.22.416 From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Fox, Chris Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 1

Re: [RDA-L] Retrospective conversion of data

it. BatchCat version: 2007.22.416 From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Fox, Chris Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 11:00 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA> Subjec

Re: [RDA-L] Retrospective conversion of data

Gary, I'm just curious about many staff you have, both copy catalogers and original catalogers, to accomplish this. I don't think there is enough of me to attempt something like this to any degree. What are others doing, especially you smaller libraries? Are you planning some degree of retros

Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements

I appreciate all of the discussion going on about the question I posed. I think it is precisely these kind of "non-standard" (if there even is such a thing) situations and issues are what help us get at the core of the rules and what they are trying to say. If they don't explain things clearly

Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements

Thanks so much to all of you for your input and help. Do I infer date of production based on the performance date (2008), or when I think the disc was actually created (2013)? I guess if this is a work attribute, then the date would more likely be the 2008, and the particular item I have in m

[RDA-L] recording production statements

Please excuse cross-posting... Hello, I am trying to catalog a DVD which I *think* would be considered unpublished: A professor here wrote to the choreographer of a performance he saw to find out if it was possible to obtain a recording of the dance. He was told by the choreographer that she

Re: [RDA-L] Use of ISBD punctuation with RDA. And a workshop.

here other references about punctuations in RDA Toolkit? Thanks, Joan Wang Illinois Heartland Library System. Punctuation at the End of MARC Fields 245, 246-247, 250, 264, 300, 310/321, 362, 490 On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Fox, Chris mailto:c...@byui.edu>> wrote: Thank you, Mark, for sh

Re: [RDA-L] Use of ISBD punctuation with RDA. And a workshop.

Thank you, Mark, for sharing this document with us. For those of us who don't have the ability (for a variety of reasons) to delve into the minutiae of RDA, helps like the one you shared here are a huge blessing. I've printed a copy to keep with my RDA materials, and I know I will refer to it

Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 in RDA Toolkit

So let me get this straight: If I understand the announcement correctly, any library not ready or able to make the transition to RDA on March 31, 2013, or who can't afford it, will have to pay for a subscription to RDA Toolkit anyway to have access to AACR2, in addition to paying for the subscr

Re: [RDA-L] Libraries creating records in RDA

I know that Stanford was mentioned as one of those institutions. I'm not aware of the other Chris Christopher N. Fox, ML Catalog Librarian David O. McKay Library Brigham Young University Idaho 525 S. Center Street - 0405 Rexburg, Idaho 83460-0405 c...@byui.edu (208) 496-9525 -Original M

Re: [RDA-L] "actual RDA"

And what about those of us who are still struggling with the requirement to shell out scarce money for the Toolkit, or the print version for that matter, when we haven't even decided whether we can catalog the RDA way? -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource

Re: [RDA-L] Browse and search RDA test data

> -Original Message- > Chris Cronin wrote on 1/11/11: > One of our catalogers has noted the > consequence of this for users who import MARC records from our catalog > into citation tools like EndNote or RefWorks, and the like, and how > those tools will treat the data. So much for inter

Re: [RDA-L] Status of the US RDA Test

-Original Message- From: Fox, Chris Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:19 AM To: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging' Subject: RE: Status of the US RDA Test >What are the possible decisions? >There are four possible outcomes: >* Do not implement RDA In which case,

Re: [RDA-L] RDA release date

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 10:57 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA release date Where is the mesage? On Thu, Dec 3, 2009

Re: [RDA-L] Cataloger's Desktop 3.0 is a Major Product Re-systemization

There are a couple of resources included in Cataloger's Desktop 3 which are RDA-related. One is the RDA website: http://www.rda-jsc.org/rda.html. There is also a separate listing for the RDA discussion list: http://www.rda-jsc.org/rda.html#discuss. A related resource, Barbara Tillett's "What