se, $c 2004.
This can get frustrating, but as with all things, it gets easier the more
you do it.
Trina
Trina Pundurs
Serials Cataloger
Library Collection Services
University of California, Berkeley
tpund...@library.berkeley.edu
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/
Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1990
some tweaking of Appendix J is needed no matter what!
Trina
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Trina Pundurs <
tpund...@library.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Adam L. Schiff
> wrote:
>
>> In RDA Appendix J "reprinted as" and "reprint of (man
ok; the relationship of
the large print edition to the regular-print original would be captured by
the AAP for the work (100+245, or however it pans out for this particular
resource).
That's my take on it, anyway.
Trina
Trina Pundurs
Serials Cataloger
Library Collection Services
University of California, Berkeley
tpund...@library.berkeley.edu
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/
Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1990
-{)}.
>
RDA is definitely not an easy read the first few times. But it gets easier
with use. Or perhaps this is not true for everyone.
Trina
Trina Pundurs
Serials Cataloger
Library Collection Services
University of California, Berkeley
tpund...@library.berkeley.edu
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/
Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1990
JSC to expand the list -- it still doesn't
include "chair", but there are several that may be appropriate, such as
"administrator", "director", "manager", and "officer". Of course, none of
this will help you today, but these terms may be availa
blunt reason is that Date of Publication is Core, whereas
other kinds of dates are "core if". But I think your real question is why
Date of Publication is preferred in this way; I'm afraid I have to leave it
to others to explain that. (There's probably some JSC document th
try to supply
a date of publication for a multipart monograph as you would with a
single-part resource, including making an educated guess or giving "[not
after (today's date)]" like the examples in 1.9.2.
Really, any date you can reasonably provide is better than nothing.
My $0.02,
g "required" a note, even though MARC
> allows for (what I consider) better access through a second 264?
>
Leigh and all,
You can find PCC guidelines for repeatable 264 here:
http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/264-Guidelines.doc
Yes, it is better to use a second 264.
Trin
Hi Sara and all,
I'm not pouncing, I'm seconding.
Trina Pundurs
Serials Cataloger
Library Collection Services
University of California, Berkeley
tpund...@library.berkeley.edu
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Layne, Sara wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Mayb
n
the resource BUT they aren't so predominant or integral as to regard the
illustrator as a creator, THEN put the AAP for the illustrator in a 700
field with the relationship designator "illustrator." I would still rely
on 19.2 for determining who is the creator in any case.
;s
easy to lose sight of the order of preference:
First: Publication data
Then: Distribution data
Then: Copyright (or phonogram) date
Finally: Manufacture data
It's confusing further since the MARC second indicators go in the order 1,
2, 4, 3. Very annoying!
Anyway, I hope this is helpful to so
"Me too" to Brian, with the slight variation that I would be even less
likely than him to give 264 _4 in either case.
Trina Pundurs
Serials Cataloger
Library Collection Services
University of California, Berkeley
tpund...@library.berkeley.edu
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/
Proudly w
> --
> Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
> Cataloger -- CMC
> Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
> 6725 Goshen Road
> Edwardsville, IL 62025
> 618.656.3216x409
> 618.656.9401Fax
>
Trina Pundurs
Serials Cataloger
Library Collection Services
University of California, Berkeley
tpund...@library.berkeley.edu
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/
Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1990
entified], $c [not before 1992]
> 264 #2 $a [Place of distribution not identified] : $b [distributor
> not identified]
> 264 #3 $a [Place of manufacture not identified] : $b [manufacturer
> not identified]
>
[...]
Trina Pundurs
Serials Cataloger
Library Collection Service
14 matches
Mail list logo