Re: [RDA-L] Varying form of publisher's name on t.p./t.p. verso

2013-11-19 Thread Trina Pundurs
se, $c 2004. This can get frustrating, but as with all things, it gets easier the more you do it. Trina Trina Pundurs Serials Cataloger Library Collection Services University of California, Berkeley tpund...@library.berkeley.edu http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1990

Re: [RDA-L] reprint relationships

2013-11-17 Thread Trina Pundurs
some tweaking of Appendix J is needed no matter what! Trina On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Trina Pundurs < tpund...@library.berkeley.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Adam L. Schiff > wrote: > >> In RDA Appendix J "reprinted as" and "reprint of (man

Re: [RDA-L] reprint relationships

2013-11-17 Thread Trina Pundurs
ok; the relationship of the large print edition to the regular-print original would be captured by the AAP for the work (100+245, or however it pans out for this particular resource). That's my take on it, anyway. Trina Trina Pundurs Serials Cataloger Library Collection Services University of California, Berkeley tpund...@library.berkeley.edu http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1990

Re: [RDA-L] Date of publication

2013-09-06 Thread Trina Pundurs
-{)}. > RDA is definitely not an easy read the first few times. But it gets easier with use. Or perhaps this is not true for everyone. Trina Trina Pundurs Serials Cataloger Library Collection Services University of California, Berkeley tpund...@library.berkeley.edu http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1990

Re: [RDA-L] Relator term for committee chair

2013-08-29 Thread Trina Pundurs
JSC to expand the list -- it still doesn't include "chair", but there are several that may be appropriate, such as "administrator", "director", "manager", and "officer". Of course, none of this will help you today, but these terms may be availa

Re: [RDA-L] dtst and dates

2013-08-28 Thread Trina Pundurs
blunt reason is that Date of Publication is Core, whereas other kinds of dates are "core if". But I think your real question is why Date of Publication is preferred in this way; I'm afraid I have to leave it to others to explain that. (There's probably some JSC document th

Re: [RDA-L] Unknown begin and end dates for multipart monograph

2013-08-21 Thread Trina Pundurs
try to supply a date of publication for a multipart monograph as you would with a single-part resource, including making an educated guess or giving "[not after (today's date)]" like the examples in 1.9.2. Really, any date you can reasonably provide is better than nothing. My $0.02,

Re: [RDA-L] Multipart monographs - Questions about the 490 $3 and the repeat-ability of the 264

2013-07-25 Thread Trina Pundurs
g "required" a note, even though MARC > allows for (what I consider) better access through a second 264? > Leigh and all, You can find PCC guidelines for repeatable 264 here: http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/264-Guidelines.doc Yes, it is better to use a second 264. Trin

Re: [RDA-L] How would you relate these two works?

2013-07-10 Thread Trina Pundurs
Hi Sara and all, I'm not pouncing, I'm seconding. Trina Pundurs Serials Cataloger Library Collection Services University of California, Berkeley tpund...@library.berkeley.edu http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Layne, Sara wrote: > Hi All, > > Mayb

Re: [RDA-L] Illustrators as creators, not contributors

2013-06-26 Thread Trina Pundurs
n the resource BUT they aren't so predominant or integral as to regard the illustrator as a creator, THEN put the AAP for the illustrator in a 700 field with the relationship designator "illustrator." I would still rely on 19.2 for determining who is the creator in any case.

Re: [RDA-L] No date of publication, first printing

2013-06-22 Thread Trina Pundurs
;s easy to lose sight of the order of preference: First: Publication data Then: Distribution data Then: Copyright (or phonogram) date Finally: Manufacture data It's confusing further since the MARC second indicators go in the order 1, 2, 4, 3. Very annoying! Anyway, I hope this is helpful to so

Re: [RDA-L] No date of publication, first printing

2013-06-18 Thread Trina Pundurs
"Me too" to Brian, with the slight variation that I would be even less likely than him to give 264 _4 in either case. Trina Pundurs Serials Cataloger Library Collection Services University of California, Berkeley tpund...@library.berkeley.edu http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ Proudly w

Re: [RDA-L] Language of expression

2013-06-04 Thread Trina Pundurs
> -- > Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D. > Cataloger -- CMC > Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office) > 6725 Goshen Road > Edwardsville, IL 62025 > 618.656.3216x409 > 618.656.9401Fax > Trina Pundurs Serials Cataloger Library Collection Services University of California, Berkeley tpund...@library.berkeley.edu http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1990

Re: [RDA-L] RDA 2.8 through 2.10, and Core status

2013-05-14 Thread Trina Pundurs
entified], $c [not before 1992] > 264 #2 $a [Place of distribution not identified] : $b [distributor > not identified] > 264 #3 $a [Place of manufacture not identified] : $b [manufacturer > not identified] > [...] Trina Pundurs Serials Cataloger Library Collection Service