Hello,
I have one a case with the following:
Reprinted date 2013
First published date 2012
Copyright Robin Mansell (c)2012 (the author)
I recorded them in RDA 246 as follows:
008 date type r Date 1 = 2012Date 2 = 2013
264 #1 $a Oxford : $b Oxford University Press, $c [2013]
264 #4 $a
I would consider First published date 2012 as the publication date.
Reprinted date 2013 would be a manufacture date. In this case, the
manufacture statement can be ignored. Anyway, if you consider it important,
put a 500 note for the reprinted date.
Also, for the second 264 field (with the second
, August 22, 2013 4:02 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 264 with copyright date and first published date and
reprint date
I would consider First published date 2012 as the publication date. Reprinted
date 2013 would be a manufacture date. In this case, the manufacture
3 matches
Mail list logo