Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-31 Thread Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger
Thank you, Mac. I know many of us appreciate what you are doing to make RDA "cataloger friendly."  Lynne J. LaBare Sen

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-31 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Lynnne LaBare said: >I have the "MARC Code List for Relators" and >Mac's Special Libraries >Cataloging list from an email dated 8/29/2103. You might wish to print it out again from the MRIs our website. Based on Mark's helpful post, I added more terms Tuesday: http://special-cataloguing.com/mr

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-31 Thread Wagstaff, D John
8:32 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator That would be a "naughty designator" rather than an "inappropriate one"! It's way before Friday for humor, isn't it? ;0) On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Kevin M Randall wrote: &

[RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-30 Thread Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger
Thank you Adam, Kevin, Mark, Mac, and all those who gave some thought (and added some humor) to the matter of assigning appropriate relationship designators to the Natural History Museum title.  I appreciate the assistance and learn a great deal by followi

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread Adam L. Schiff
Access / Resource Description and Access To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator Like one that would be used for a particular work by Nathaniel Hawthorne, I suppose? Kevin -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / R

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread Adam L. Schiff
2013 13:07:47 -0600 From: "Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger" To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator J. McRee Elrod wrote: Yes, if the Museum is 264 1 $b. The 264 field appears as: 264 1 |a Buffalo, N.Y. :|b Firefly Books, |c

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread Adam L. Schiff
Librarian/Cataloger" To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator Colleagues, Would you please inform me what the appropriate relationship designator would be for the following based on the 245 field below? 245 10 |a Natural History Museum bo

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread M. E.
Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger wrote: > Is it correct to state that I can use "contributor" (20.2.1.3) or > "creator" (I.2.1) when a *specific* MRI for an entity does not exist that > reflects the entity's relationship to the bibliographical content of the > work? > If you choose not t

[RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger
J. McRee (Mac) Elrod wrote: Kevin advises no relationship designator if none applies, Another poster has advised that if no exact term works, use the larger category. even if not the the lists. (The MRIs add those categories to its list.) In this case you might consider $ecreator. T

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread Kevin M Randall
, October 29, 2013 3:23 PM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator > > Can anyone point me to an "inappropriate relationship designator"? That > sounds a lot more fun... > > (Sorry, but I couldn't resist

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread Wagstaff, D John
217-244-4070 e-mail: wagst...@illinois.edu -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:20 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re:

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Lynne asked: >In this case, do I simply add the corporate name heading (access point) >without any relationship designator even though the Natural History >Museum holds the copyright ... Kevin advises no relationship designator if none applies, Another poster has advised that if no exact term

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread Gary L Strawn
ible shoes since 1978! From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:08 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relatio

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread Kevin M Randall
ince 1978! From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:08 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationsh

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger
J. McRee Elrod wrote: Yes, if the Museum is 264 1 $b. The 264 field appears as: 264 1 |a Buffalo, N.Y. :|b Firefly Books, |c 2013. In this case, do I simply add the corporate name heading (access point) with

Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Lynne LaBare asked : >245 10 |a Natural History Museum book of animal records : ?b thousands >of amazing facts and unbelievable feats / |c Mark Carwardine. > >710 2 |a Natural History Museum (London, England), |e issuing body (?) Yes, if the Museum is 264 1 $b. __ __ J. McRee (Mac)

[RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

2013-10-29 Thread Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger
Colleagues, Would you please inform me what the appropriate relationship designator would be for the following based on the 245 field below? 245 10 |a Natural History Museum book of animal records : ǂb thousands of amazing facts a