Re: [RDA-L] FW: [RDA-L] Library of Congress response to LCWG

> -Original Message- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description > and Access [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Tribby > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:16 PM > To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] FW: [RDA-L] Library of Congres

Re: [RDA-L] FW: [RDA-L] Library of Congress response to LCWG

>From Jim Weinheimer: >To be fair, I think a lot of this [i.e.-- doubt that paper media is about to >disappear] comes from people who don't like to read off of a computer screen >(myself included!) and print things off so that they can be read more >comfortably. MT: Maybe, but I think we're a

Re: [RDA-L] FW: [RDA-L] Library of Congress response to LCWG

> -Original Message- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description > and Access [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Tribby > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:01 PM > To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA > Subject: [RDA-L] FW: [RDA-L] Library of Congres

[RDA-L] FW: [RDA-L] Library of Congress response to LCWG

>Am 21 Jul 2008 um 11:37 hat Laurence S. Creider geschrieben: > scroll to codex was lost. That will not be in our lifetimes, however. To which Armin Stephan replied: >Really??? I don't know ... I don't know either, but given that I've been hearing about the coming "paperless" office and world b