Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

Am 28.07.2011 18:50, schrieb J. McRee Elrod: I find RDA terminology far less precise that AACR2, which extends to the HTML markup terms above. Basic distinctions are lacking. That's not your fault Karen, considering the muddy text you had to work with. Any word on who is given the task of

[RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

I decided that I wanted to play with creating RDA data in XML (not RDF-XML), so I did a very short experiment, which is located here: http://kcoyle.net/rda/RDAinXML.html This is NOT a test or any kind of proof because it's just one short cataloging record that I copied into RDA fields. In

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

Hi Karen, Thanks for posting this to the list. As I understand it, there are two discrete RDA elements at play here: Language of the Expression (6.11), and Authorized Access Point Representing an Expression (6.27.3). As you point out, only the former is registered in the RDvocab.info

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

Karen Coyle said: rda:titleOfTheWork Hamlet. French /rda:titleOfTheWork AccessPointHamlet. French/AccessPoint or even AccessPointShakespeare...etc. Hamlet. French/AccessPoint In MARC, the language would be subfield coded, so I suspect at least as much granularity

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

Mac, I think the the lack of added entries you are citing is only relevant in a left-anchored browsing environment. Moving forward, such left-anchored entries are not required for access. If a work is about Hamlet, contains Hamlet, derives from Hamlet, etc., then the term Hamlet will be

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

I want to be sure I understand this. If the work is a criticism of Hamlet, under current subject heading rules, there would be a 600 10 Shakespeare, William. |t Hamlet, right? On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote: Karen Coyle said: rda:titleOfTheWork

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

On 28/07/2011 17:42, Karen Coyle wrote: snip Each of these parts of the access point could (and probably should) be coded separately in the record. The question is whether they should *also* be included as an access point. There are, however, no RDA or FRBR elements listed for access points.

Re: [RDA-L] RDA in XML - Question

James said: In the best scenario, it seems this should be something like: AccessPoint work author personalNameShakespeare/personalName Shakespeare did not write the critique. His play is the subject. originalTitleHamlet/originalTitle this is not the original title of the critique, unless you