Am 28.07.2011 18:50, schrieb J. McRee Elrod:
I find RDA terminology far less precise that AACR2, which extends to
the HTML markup terms above. Basic distinctions are lacking. That's
not your fault Karen, considering the muddy text you had to work with.
Any word on who is given the task of
I decided that I wanted to play with creating RDA data in XML (not
RDF-XML), so I did a very short experiment, which is located here:
http://kcoyle.net/rda/RDAinXML.html
This is NOT a test or any kind of proof because it's just one short
cataloging record that I copied into RDA fields. In
Hi Karen,
Thanks for posting this to the list. As I understand it, there are two
discrete RDA elements at play here: Language of the Expression (6.11),
and Authorized Access Point Representing an Expression (6.27.3). As you
point out, only the former is registered in the RDvocab.info
Karen Coyle said:
rda:titleOfTheWork
Hamlet. French
/rda:titleOfTheWork
AccessPointHamlet. French/AccessPoint
or even
AccessPointShakespeare...etc. Hamlet. French/AccessPoint
In MARC, the language would be subfield coded, so I suspect at least
as much granularity
Mac,
I think the the lack of added entries you are citing is only relevant
in a left-anchored browsing environment. Moving forward, such
left-anchored entries are not required for access. If a work is about
Hamlet, contains Hamlet, derives from Hamlet, etc., then the term
Hamlet will be
I want to be sure I understand this. If the work is a criticism of Hamlet,
under current subject heading rules, there would be a 600 10 Shakespeare,
William. |t Hamlet, right?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
Karen Coyle said:
rda:titleOfTheWork
On 28/07/2011 17:42, Karen Coyle wrote:
snip
Each of these parts of the access point could (and probably should)
be coded separately in the record. The question is whether they should
*also* be included as an access point. There are, however, no RDA or
FRBR elements listed for access points.
James said:
In the best scenario, it seems this should be something like:
AccessPoint
work
author
personalNameShakespeare/personalName
Shakespeare did not write the critique. His play is the subject.
originalTitleHamlet/originalTitle
this is not the original title of the critique, unless you
8 matches
Mail list logo