Renette Davis wrote:
6.10.2.2.1b.1 - Why would you want to provide an access point for the
succeeding resource? Wouldn't that be an earliest entry record?
I agree completely -- AACR2 21.28 includes in its terminology
continuations and sequels for examples, yet 21.28B1 offers not a
single
At 04:34 PM 7/25/2006, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
I don't think 780 and 785 are access points.
They are access points in every catalogue for which we prepare MARC
records. Why else have them? If one just wanted a note, wouldn't one
use 5XX?
While some systems (or implementations of some
Some of these linking field citations do NOT make good access points,
because of the way they are constructed and coded all in one MARC
subfield, witness the following linking fields for translations of
journals:
780 00 $t Radiotekhnika i elektronika. English. Radio engineering and
electronics
Kevin M. Randall said:
The linking fields are there for the purpose of creating notes and linking
related records.
The authors of RDA seem to me to be thinking in terms of FRBR, linking
in particular, when writing the provisions under discussion. If you
have a link to a record, you presumably
4 matches
Mail list logo
