Hi Ladislav and Gabriele,
> Your IS-REALLY-ERROR? function works for simple code like above, but, AFAIK,
> we cannot handle all possible cases, like e.g.:
>
> is-really-error? [1 first block2] ; == true
>
> (until errors will be "first class").
You are right about first class, but i think th
Hi Ladislav,
On Sunday, September 1, 2002, 8:28:22 PM, you wrote:
LM> It looks to me, that the "first class error" and the "legal vs. illegal
LM> error" distinction are two sides of the same coin.
Indeed. We cannot use errors at all, only disarm them. So,
probably we can state that
Robert M. Muench wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>On Behalf Of Robert M. Muench
>>Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 3:07 PM
>>To: Rebollist
>>Subject: [REBOL] RFC: Rebol Framework
>>
>>
>
>Hi, just a short update: I got most of the fra
Hi again,
LM> The difference is, that in this case the result of the (first block2)
LM> expression evaluation "legally" exists, that is why I call it a "legal"
LM> error.
<>
I see. I'd more likely have errors as first class, instead of a
DEFAULT function able to make the distinction. A
Hi Ladislav,
On Sunday, September 1, 2002, 1:23:35 PM, you wrote:
LM> The difference is, that in this case the result of the (first block2)
LM> expression evaluation "legally" exists, that is why I call it a "legal"
LM> error.
I see. I'd more likely have errors as first class, instead of a
D
Hi Gregg,
On Sunday, September 1, 2002, 6:09:39 PM, you wrote:
GI> platform (anywhere TTF fonts are used), I'd be willing to spend a little
GI> time on it if people feel there is a lot of vale to be had from it. I.e.
Well Gregg, if you get to parsing TTFs, there is a little
possibility
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of Robert M. Muench
> Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 3:07 PM
> To: Rebollist
> Subject: [REBOL] RFC: Rebol Framework
Hi, just a short update: I got most of the framework running. I won't
call it a fra
Sunday, September 1, 2002, 3:52:33 AM, Jason wrote:
> arghh!@#$ =>> HELP..
> Please, does anyone have a tested, working example of http upload
> script in REBOL with its HTML form?
For a very basic example, use the following two things:
- one cgi handling the HTTP POST
- a HTML containing the
<< Last night I looked at the raw binary on a couple of fonts. The name is
in
there, but I wasn't readily able to identify a constant location nor a
bracketing pair of words or symbols that would make parsing easy. (It wasn't
obvious *to me*, at least.) >>
The format is available (wotsit has a li
<< OK, I sucked, and saw disappointment. When I peeked at the
\windows\fonts directory earlier, I had forgotten that the folder view was
one of Windows fancy folders. >>
I think Explorer, in order to display the font names as if they were the
actual file names, parses the files (takes a lon
Hello Anton
On 31-Ago-02, Anton wrote:
> rebol.exe ; the latest beta 1.2.8.3.1
> rebol12531.exe ; the latest full 1.2.5.3.1
Thank a lot for this trick, I will try later
Regards
--
"Where did you get all those facts!?!"
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email
> I was thinking of writing a Rebol/zine article to show
> this is done.
>
> I guess I'd better start writing ...
Well Graham
That would be great. I look forward to it.
...I was thinking of writing one too, when I finally get it working to my
satisfaction ;-)
cheers
./Jason
--
To unsubscribe
Hello Gabriele
On 31-Ago-02, Gabriele Santilli wrote:
>
>> Yep! I'm a very clever guy :P But I don't know how to retrive this
>> information :(
>
> Hmm... are you talking about SYSTEM/SCRIPT/PATH?
It seems to me pretty good, even if it does not work as we wish with Amiga's
Logical Device (assig
Hi Gabriele and all,
LM> I am still curious, if many Rebol users prefer to allow UNSET! valued
LM> expressions (eventually why?).
<>
There's no reason to have them, and that's just likely to be an
implementation issue with the current interpreter (it needs unset!
for unset words, and once yo
Hi, Gabriele,
From: "Gabriele Santilli"
> Maybe we could just look into the TTF file to
> extract its real name.
Last night I looked at the raw binary on a couple of fonts. The name is in
there, but I wasn't readily able to identify a constant location nor a
bracketing pair of words or symbo
Hi Scott,
On Sunday, September 1, 2002, 5:06:36 AM, you wrote:
GSJ> mapping table or GDI access ... or ... someone needs to save me from myself.
GSJ> Again!
Maybe we could just look into the TTF file to extract its real
name. (Are TTF specs available?)
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Sa
Hi Gregg,
On Saturday, August 31, 2002, 8:41:59 PM, you wrote:
GI> A partial transparency causing 50% event firing? :)
I assume Holger was referring to 100% transparent pixels. ;-)
GI> Actually, I suppose that could probably work!
Indeed, it could be made to do event "filters", but it woul
Hi Ladislav,
On Saturday, August 31, 2002, 8:28:43 PM, you wrote:
LM> I am still curious, if many Rebol users prefer to allow UNSET! valued
LM> expressions (eventually why?).
There's no reason to have them, and that's just likely to be an
implementation issue with the current interpreter (it
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of Gregg Irwin
> Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 8:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: InformIT.com Articles Introduction to
> WaterT A New Native Web Services
> Also, Robert, I stil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of Gerard Cote
> Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 11:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: A REBOL Framework was - Re: InformIT.com
> Articles Intro...
> I already read with interst the
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002 21:52:33 -0400
"Jason Cunliffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please, does anyone have a tested, working example of
>http upload script in
>REBOL with its HTML form? If so please can you can send
Hi Jason,
I was thinking of writing a Rebol/zine article to show
this is don
21 matches
Mail list logo
