I'm trying to run a REBOL script from Cron (on RedHat 9) but it always causes
a segmentation fault. I've tried a number of experiments (running simple
scripts as various users, etc.) but the result is always the same. Has
anyone else experienced this?
-Karl
--
To unsubscribe from this lis
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:43:31 -0800
"rebol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've attempted Brett Handley's
>"system/schemes/ftp/handler/cache-size: 0" but I get an
>invalid path value error.
That was a typo.
It should be
system/schemes/ftp/cache-size: 0
Romano's latest beta patch seems to fix
Incidentally, you can find where the ftp
handler uses the cache-size setting by
doing this:
write clipboard:// mold system/schemes/ftp/handler
Then paste into a new text file and search for
"cache-size".
Anton.
> He made a small mistake, try:
>
> system/schemes/ftp/cache-size: 0
>
>
Hi Patrick.
The update-scripts.r script is approx four years old and attempts to
access a host that no longer services this book. I'll contact you off
list regarding updates.
Elan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On page 38 of "REBOL the official Guide" instructions are given which sate
>
>
>**
He made a small mistake, try:
system/schemes/ftp/cache-size: 0
Anton.
> I've attempted Brett Handley's
> "system/schemes/ftp/handler/cache-size: 0" but I get an invalid
> path value error.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMA
Hello,
I've been reading some of the posts regarding rebol's ftp. I am having an issue with
the closing of ftp ports. My host recently went to a 2 ftp connection limit (from the
same IP) and this has caused my 5 year old ftp scripts to fail.
What happens is this - I have a function that opens a
On page 38 of "REBOL the official Guide" instructions are given which sate
*
Enter the following instructions at REBOL's prompt:
ยป do %update-scripts.r
REBOL will connect to the authors' Web site,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 8:45:47 PM, Carl wrote:
> It is quite possible that he simply made a mistake with his email
> client (or a REBOL script) that caused the flood.
Telling from a personal exchange, it was definitely no mistake but
quite the opposite.
Nevertheless, if he's off the list no
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:18:19 +0100, Gabriele Santilli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Monday, December 1, 2003, 12:24:50 AM, you wrote:
>
> MF> Well, no code since now. I just tries a open
> MF> tcp://192.168.30.xxx:anyport MF> but that always report that it is
> not possible to
Dear all,
I realised that I did not test the logging of errors with log4reb, and,
as usually, what is not tested does not work! I therefore fixed and
improved the logging of errors. You can find the latest version at
http://www.rebolgique.org/rebsite/projects/log4reb.tar.gz . Test scrips
have bee
The REBOL/View 1.3 project is now underway. The release date (goal) is the end of
December 2003.
Discussions related to the project are being handled by AltME (the nice little IM
system written in REBOL), and they are being cross-posted to the web at this address:
http://www.rebol.net/projects
RT does have control over the list, and we could ban him. However, we do not do so
lightly. (In fact, we've never kicked someone off the list or banned them in the
history of this list.)
It is quite possible that he simply made a mistake with his email client (or a REBOL
script) that caused th
perhaps a cron job could keep him unsubscribed ;)
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Ladislav Mecir wrote:
>
> Maarten Koopmans napsal(a):
>
> >John,
> >
> >I take it you still have problems with getting off the list? Although I
> >understand the *major* annoyance 64 forwards isn't too swell for the
> >rest o
Maarten Koopmans napsal(a):
>John,
>
>I take it you still have problems with getting off the list? Although I
>understand the *major* annoyance 64 forwards isn't too swell for the
>rest of us.
>What's the point in annoying hundreds of people because you have a
>problem? How would you feel if y
[REBOL] [REBOL.org] Recent changes
This is an automatic email from REBOL.org, the REBOL Script Library to notify you of
recent changes to the Library.
===changes===
cgi-debug.r
--change: new script
--change: documentation added or updated
--title: CGI wrapper function for debugging
dump
Hi James,
As John's messages appear on the ML then I assume he must be subscribed.
So either he is still subscribed or he somehow got re-subscribed.
Anyway the messages seem to have stopped for now.
Cheers Phil
>
> === Original Message ===
>
>
> I'm beginning to suspect that John is trollin
Hi Mauro,
On Monday, December 1, 2003, 12:24:50 AM, you wrote:
MF> Well, no code since now. I just tries a open
MF> tcp://192.168.30.xxx:anyport
MF> but that always report that it is not possible to open the connection with
MF> the selected IP.
Was that port open on that destination machine?
I'm beginning to suspect that John is trolling rather than having
difficulties getting off the list..
Isn't there SOMEONE in charge of the list we can contact - even if its
to ban mail from john?
Regards,
James.
Maarten Koopmans wrote:
>John,
>
>I take it you still have problems with gettin
John,
I take it you still have problems with getting off the list? Although I
understand the *major* annoyance 64 forwards isn't too swell for the
rest of us.
What's the point in annoying hundreds of people because you have a
problem? How would you feel if you were on a list and somebody behav
19 matches
Mail list logo
