On 17-Dec-03, A J Martin wrote:
> From:
>
http://www.stannsparish.org/news/bulletins/bulletin-June-23-2002.3.php
> Quote:
> Friday, June 28, 2002
> 7:00am Mass +Anne Kenney (Ch)
> by Pat and Jim Rebol
> ?!
If you search Google News at the moment for REBOL you'll find three
links (and only t
From:
http://www.stannsparish.org/news/bulletins/bulletin-June-23-2002.3.php
Quote:
Friday, June 28, 2002
7:00am Mass +Anne Kenney (Ch)
by Pat and Jim Rebol
?!
Andrew J Martin
Speaking in tongues and performing miracles.
ICQ: 26227169
http://www.rebol.it/Valley/
http://valley.orcon.net.nz/
h
This has been fixed in REBOL/View 1.2.10.3.1
>> + 1 2
== 3
>> type? (+ 1 2)
== integer!
Anton.
> Hello list,
>
> there is a difference between the documentation of the + function
> in the REBOL dictionary and the one I get with HELP +.
>
> In the first one usage says that + a b should work,
Gregg Irwin wrote:
>Hi Sunanda,
>
>Sac> NothingNothing is fixed in REBOL.
>
>LOL! :) Brilliant!
>
>-- Gregg
>
>
>
unfortunately that can also be read:
... it was broken from the start.
and that is NOT an impression we want to convey :-(
James.
--
To unsubscribe
Joel Neely wrote:
>- REBOL: Life's too short to write long programs
>
>
Nice pick !
Shall I steal this line from you to explain my co-workers why I am a Rebol ?
--
Bruno Bord
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
Hi Sunanda,
Sac> NothingNothing is fixed in REBOL.
LOL! :) Brilliant!
-- Gregg
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
> Can we find a snappy one-liner?
Belatedly lobbing an answer in of my own...
NothingNothing is fixed in REBOL.
Sunanda.
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
Hmm -
I see this topic has generated a few messages back and forth. I haven't read all of
them, those I have piqued my interest. REBOL is an interesting issue for me. I use
it almost every day, and yet I've never used it to produce an external system; all
the things I do in REBOL are to mak
Ged, Joel et al,
OK, so after reading Ged's latest post:
REBOL: Because code really is just data
Now, the EVAL discussion interests me because I've been of the opinion
that while many other languages support an EVAL function it is
different than what REBOL does. Can you achieve the same th
Hi, Ged,
Ged Byrne wrote:
>>
>> use LWP::Simple;
>> eval get ("http://your-site-here";);
>>
>
> The code required to pass a string to another machine
> and have it execute is simple enough, but it isn't
> enough for the real world.
>
> The code as given presents a massive security risk.
>
Hi, Maxim,
Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch wrote:
>
> ... In this case, rebol outdoes everybody, IMHO.
> For security, you can just encrypt the data before sending it,
> and even that is (rather) easy to integrate right in a protocol.
>
That's not the only security issue. Encrypting the source as it
> - REBOL: The message is the medium.
excellent :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ged Byrne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: What does REBOL fix?
>
>
> Looking at it again, the challange was "to describe
> [the language] in terms of the problem it fixes."
> -Original Message-
> From: Ged Byrne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: What does REBOL fix?
>
>
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> --- Joel Neely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> > I disclaim all knowledge re PHP, but h
> Can we find a snappy one-liner?
"All User-Serviceable Parts Inside"
(as opposed to the common sticker on many electronic appliances that
says "No user-serviceable parts inside")
When I first HEARD about REBOL and who was writing it, I wanted to try
it because of its alleged simplicity. When
Hello Carl,
Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 8:45:56 AM, you wrote:
CR> On 16-Dec-03, rebOldes wrote:
>> Hello Carl,
>> As you are preparing new build of Rebol, I would like to ask you, If
>> it would be possible to change somehow handling of "invalid
>> datatypes"
>> As I'm working on a probably
Hello Gabriele,
Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 10:35:37 AM, you wrote:
GS> Hi rebOldes,
GS> On Monday, December 15, 2003, 2:50:06 PM, you wrote:
r>> I think the best way would be to handle these 'invalid' words as a
r>> special word which would not be able to hold some values but I would
r>> be
Hi Joel,
--- Joel Neely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> I disclaim all knowledge re PHP, but here's a
> trivial Perl client
> to fetch and execute/evaluate source from a remote
> host.
>
>use LWP::Simple;
>eval get ("http://your-site-here";);
>
>
> I guess one has to decide whether a
> -Original Message-
> From: Cribbs, Jamey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: What does REBOL fix?
>
>
>
> Gabriele Santilli wrote:
>
> >Hi Jason,
> >
> >On Monday, December 15, 2003, 6:02:50 PM, you wrote
Hi, Gabriele,
Gabriele Santilli wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Monday, December 15, 2003, 6:02:50 PM, you wrote:
>
> JC> Yes but that is still also true for HTML, XSLT, Perl, Python,
> JC> PHP, Java, C,
> JC> etc..
>
> How do you MOLD some PHP code and send it to another computer? ;-)
>
I
My hat in the ring:
REally BEautiful Language
(The "BE" because, REBOL is meant to be pronounced "REBEL")
Regards
Sabu Francis
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
Gabriele Santilli wrote:
>Hi Jason,
>
>On Monday, December 15, 2003, 6:02:50 PM, you wrote:
>
>JC> Yes but that is still also true for HTML, XSLT, Perl, Python, PHP, Java, C,
>JC> etc..
>
>How do you MOLD some PHP code and send it to another computer? ;-)
>
>
>
I don't know how you do it in PH
- REBOL: The message is the medium.
- REBOL: Programming for "block" heads
- REBOL: Life's too short to write long programs
- REBOL: Fight carpal tunnel syndrome!
- REBOL: Good things come in small packages
- REBOL: Because Von Neumann was right!
- Real Expressiveness Based On diaLects
- Ra
Hi Petr,
On Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 11:02:46 AM, you wrote:
PK> Well, OTOH, AFAIK :-) (what an abbreviations :-), Rebol is not fully
PK> serialisable- is it?
We're not talking about generic data serialization; we're talking
about the fact that code is just data that you can manipulate and
I like this.
How about taking it a little further:
REBOL - You want many languages running on many
machines, but a single, simple foundation.
--- Jason Cunliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: >
> > REBOL - When one language just isn't enough.
>
> nice :-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, j
Hello list,
there is a difference between the documentation of the + function in the REBOL
dictionary and the one I get with HELP +.
In the first one usage says that + a b should work, while the last one says usage
should be a + b.
Now when I try it at the console I get for:
>> 1 + 2
=
Gabriele Santilli wrote:
>Hi Jason,
>
>On Monday, December 15, 2003, 6:02:50 PM, you wrote:
>
>JC> Yes but that is still also true for HTML, XSLT, Perl, Python, PHP, Java, C,
>JC> etc..
>
>How do you MOLD some PHP code and send it to another computer? ;-)
>
>
>
Well, OTOH, AFAIK :-) (what an a
On 14-Dec-03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can we find a snappy one-liner?
> http://www.paulgraham.com/fix.html
(more in the spirit of the above web page)
Lisp is powerful. Logo is fun. But C is practical.
-- Stan Silver
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jason,
On Monday, December 15, 2003, 8:26:50 PM, you wrote:
JC> Simply I dont think it is essential or necessarily desirable to do it all in
JC> one language.
JC> What is essential is easy interoprability.
What is essential is simplicity. Any new piece you have to add
adds complexity,
Hi rebOldes,
On Monday, December 15, 2003, 2:50:06 PM, you wrote:
r> I think the best way would be to handle these 'invalid' words as a
r> special word which would not be able to hold some values but I would
r> be able to parse this word as a normal string.
You can use string parsing and then
Hi Jason,
On Monday, December 15, 2003, 6:02:50 PM, you wrote:
JC> Yes but that is still also true for HTML, XSLT, Perl, Python, PHP, Java, C,
JC> etc..
How do you MOLD some PHP code and send it to another computer? ;-)
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- REBO
On 14-Dec-03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can we find a snappy one-liner?
> http://www.paulgraham.com/fix.html
Sassenrathian Dialectic:
Lisp is powerful; Logo is fun.
But C is practical.
Rebol is powerful, fun, and practical.
-- Stan Silver
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email
A J Martin napsal(a):
>REBOL - When one language just isn't enough.
>
>
I like it. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
On 14-Dec-03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can we find a snappy one-liner?
> http://www.paulgraham.com/fix.html
REBOL: XML can't parse itself.
--
Carl Read
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
On 16-Dec-03, rebOldes wrote:
> Hello Carl,
> As you are preparing new build of Rebol, I would like to ask you, If
> it would be possible to change somehow handling of "invalid
> datatypes"
> As I'm working on a probably the largest known dialect using Rebol -
> the Rebol/Flash dialect ( http:/
35 matches
Mail list logo
