[REBOL] Re: DyBASE test

2003-12-27 Thread SunandaDH
Konstantin: > And once object > is created it is not possible to add fields to it (very strange > restriction for such flexible and dynamic language as Rebol). In simple cases (if the object is not yet referenced anywhere else), it is very simple an-object: make object! [field1: now] an-o

[REBOL] Re: DyBASE test

2003-12-27 Thread Konstantin Knizhnik
Hello Robert, Saturday, December 27, 2003, 1:36:17 PM, you wrote: RMM> On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 20:25:14 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik RMM> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Certainly it should be possible to use any word as object field. >> As I understand from your mail, the problem takes place while >

[REBOL] Re: wrong Fonts with Linux/Dabian and View

2003-12-27 Thread JCM
Hi. :) I had the same problem some time ago. I don't remember where I found this neither who has done it, but you can set the font used by rebol by adding this to your user.r file : set-default-font: func [ "sets default font for /View" font-blk [block! word!] "block of font attributes"

[REBOL] Re: wrong Fonts with Linux/Dabian and View

2003-12-27 Thread Gabriele Santilli
Hi Rene, On Saturday, December 27, 2003, 5:32:41 PM, you wrote: RSB> I use rebol/view (1.2.1.4.2) together with a Linux/Debian(woody) System. RSB> After installing/deinstalling some packages I see the wrong Fontsize for RSB> the Desktop-Icons and Fields. The letters are too big. How can I change

[REBOL] wrong Fonts with Linux/Dabian and View

2003-12-27 Thread Rene Schrader-Boelsche
Hi there, I use rebol/view (1.2.1.4.2) together with a Linux/Debian(woody) System. After installing/deinstalling some packages I see the wrong Fontsize for the Desktop-Icons and Fields. The letters are too big. How can I change the fonts manually? cheers Rene -- Rene Schrader-Boelsche

[REBOL] Re: DyBASE test

2003-12-27 Thread "Robert M. Münch"
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 20:25:14 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Certainly it should be possible to use any word as object field. > As I understand from your mail, the problem takes place while > processing of "to" field. I added "to" field to my guess example. > It works wit