[REBOL] Re: How best to debug REBOL?

2004-05-02 Thread Gregg Irwin
Hi Tony, ABC> I'm sure this is an FAQ (so apologies in advance), but I haven't found an ABC> answer in any of the FAQs. Is there an interactive way of debugging ABC> REBOL, or any way beyond adding print statements? Check out the TRACE function. Be aware that it can produce *volumes* of output

[REBOL] Re: probe/dump-binary survey

2004-05-02 Thread Gregg Irwin
Hi Anton, AR> Please consider that molded code should be able to be AR> loaded back by rebol. So I say no. AR> I have no real objection to including dump-bin named as is AR> though. Are you saying that because that's how PROBE currently works (i.e. the molded result is exactly what is displayed)

[REBOL] [survey] probe/dump-binary

2004-05-02 Thread Gregg Irwin
I posted the wrong versions of my survey scripts. Hate it when I do that. Sorry. Here are the correct ones. They just fix the subject line. --Gregg ; Core Version address: head reverse [EMAIL PROTECTED] reply: func [data] [ print "^/Sending response..." send address rejoin ["probe/dump

[REBOL] Re: probe/dump-binary survey

2004-05-02 Thread Romano Paolo Tenca
Hi, > Please consider that molded code should be able to be > loaded back by rebol. So I say no. I agree. Could be an help service. --- Ciao Romano -- To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.

[REBOL] Re: probe/dump-binary survey

2004-05-02 Thread Anton Rolls
Please consider that molded code should be able to be loaded back by rebol. So I say no. I have no real objection to including dump-bin named as is though. Anton. > Jaime et al > > JV> Greg, I think your suggestion that probe should produce output > JV> similar to dump-bin by default is great.

[REBOL] probe/dump-binary survey

2004-05-02 Thread Gregg Irwin
Jaime et al JV> Greg, I think your suggestion that probe should produce output JV> similar to dump-bin by default is great. I hope Carl goes for it. For those who don't know, I posted this idea on an AltME world for comment. For those who want to express an opinion on the matter, there are two

[REBOL] Re: [The Gimp] clashes with REBOL on Windows 2000

2004-05-02 Thread bry
well this is sort of weird, I don't have a home environment variable, and rebol seems to work fine. > > Hi all, > > when I tried to install The Gimp on Windows 2000 I found out that there is a > clash with REBOL. > I've set the environment variable HOME to point to the REBOL/View > executabl

[REBOL] [The Gimp] clashes with REBOL on Windows 2000

2004-05-02 Thread Arie van Wingerden
Hi all, when I tried to install The Gimp on Windows 2000 I found out that there is a clash with REBOL. I've set the environment variable HOME to point to the REBOL/View executable. However, The Gimp seems to take HOME as it's place to write user dependent info and tries to create directories and

[REBOL] Re: dump-binary

2004-05-02 Thread Andreas Bolka
Sunday, May 2, 2004, 2:50:44 AM, Jaime wrote: > dump-bin: func [ > "Print ASCII info for entire binary. (for debugging)" > bin [binary!] > /local v t c r pad pl len chars tmp > ][ > .. I just have to metoo: Jaime, that's great! I've been working with something similar for yea

[REBOL] Rebol on Microsoft Operanting Systems and .NET

2004-05-02 Thread Giuseppe Chillemi
Hello, I have many questions about Rebol on different Microsoft platforms. 1) Has anyone run Rebol on Microsoft Windows Tablet Edition and Windows Media Center Edition ? Are there any problems ? 2) Is there a planned version of Rebol/View(Pro?) for the Windows CE (P