From: Gabriele Santilli
SJ> I vaguely recall that TLS is an encoding or
SJ> encrypting scheme. Does anyone else know?
...
GS> TLS is the Transport Layer Security protocol.
GS>
GS>http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2246.txt
Thanks for confirming that, Gabriele. I also found:
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/
Hi Scott,
On Thursday, May 6, 2004, 12:14:23 AM, you wrote:
JS> I suspect that the major clue provided is with this line:
JS> Net-log: "250-STARTTLS"
JS> This is the most interesting point that I would like to
JS> research. I vaguely recall that TLS is an encoding or
JS> encrypting scheme
Hi, Stuart,
From: Stuart
...
> I hope I followed your directions properly.
> Can you help me figure out what is wrong?
...
for rest of email, see:
http://www.rebol.net/list/list-msgs/35906.html
This is an interesting situation. It appears as though you
did everything correctly, assuming
r] "334"]
** User Error: Server error: tcp 501 Invalid base64 data
** Near: smtp-port: open [scheme: 'smtp]
either only
> Original Message
> From: "Jones, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, Apr-
From: ML
> ...
> Sorry I didn't understand that the scripts were for SMTP
> on MS Exchange only. I know my ISP is not using Exchange
> servers, so do you think the scripts should still work,
> or is there another way to pass username/password to non
> Exchange SMTP servers?
...
Hi, Stuart,
I
tuart
> Original Message
> From: "Jones, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, Apr-29-2004 1:51 AM
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: SMTP Authentication
>
>
> Hi, Stuart,
>
> > My SMTP server requ
gt;
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, Apr-29-2004 1:13 AM
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: SMTP Authentication
>
>
> I presume the email was actually sent ?
> (Send one to yourself to verify.)
>
> I would put some PROBEs into the various
> functions of esmtp.r to see
Hi, Stuart,
> My SMTP server requires authentication with a username and
> password before allowing mail to be sent.
>
> I found esend.r and esmtp.r, installed those, ran them
> individually as in the instructions and then tries to use
> esend to send a mail.
>
> It ran without an error, but
I presume the email was actually sent ?
(Send one to yourself to verify.)
I would put some PROBEs into the various
functions of esmtp.r to see what it is
doing. Don't be frightened; they're only functions.
Did you get esmtp.r and esend.r from rebol.org ?
Finally, are you sure the smtp server r
you and email you the details in about 12
>hours when I get back from work (I'm in Malaysia - GMT+8)
>
>Nick.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>GS Jones
>Sent: 20 April 2001 02:33
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: SMTP authentication - the answer - but another
question
From: "Nick Kitson"
> Hi Scott,
>
> I'm now confused again - my Outlook (12/98) & Outlook Express (4/99) have
> both implemented SMTP authentication and work successfully with
From: "Nick Kitson"
> Hi Scott,
>
> I'm now confused again - my Outlook (12/98) & Outlook Express (4/99) have
> both implemented SMTP authentication and work successfully with my
> authenticating servers. MS are not known to lead the pack in this area so
> surely there is standardisation of sorts
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:54:42PM +0800, Nick Kitson wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> I'm now confused again - my Outlook (12/98) & Outlook Express (4/99) have
> both implemented SMTP authentication and work successfully with my
> authenticating servers. MS are not known to lead the pack in this area so
Hi Scott,
I'm now confused again - my Outlook (12/98) & Outlook Express (4/99) have
both implemented SMTP authentication and work successfully with my
authenticating servers. MS are not known to lead the pack in this area so
surely there is standardisation of sorts, (even if it is MS sorts)
Nic
Heya GS,
GJ> Like you, I'm surprised that more services haven't initiated SMTP
GJ> authentication at least to some level.
Ahem, no one has yet introduced a proper binary transport system for
E-mail yet other than encoding in base-86 to hack into a 7-bit
character set.
Same is true of Usenet. So
From: "Nick Kitson"
> Hi Scott and Brett,
>
> Thanks for your suggestions - I took it to 'feedback' and got -
>
> > "REBOL does not currently support SMTP authorization though your request
> has been added to our protocol enhancement list.
>
> > If you can't possibly wait, the SMTP protocol in REB
king problem. I looked at the trace
you gave and I wonder if this is a corporate lan or an ISP.
Brett.
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Kitson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:22 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: SMTP authentication
far,
Nick.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
GS Jones
Sent: 18 April 2001 00:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: SMTP authentication
Nick asked:
Hi, I'm new to Rebol and have a problem with SMTP authentication which my
mail server r
Nick asked:
Hi, I'm new to Rebol and have a problem with SMTP authentication which my
mail server requires but the Send function does not appear to include.
I've tried a POP read first but it doesn't help.
I've done a fair bit of RFMing but no luck.
The documentation for SMTP doesn't refer to a
ary to do a POP read first.
Over time I think we will see most SMTP servers require authentication in
order to prevent spamming so a solution is going to be required at some
point. Any more ideas?
Regards,
Nick
-----Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Be
From: "Nick Kitson"
> Hi, I'm new to Rebol and have a problem with SMTP authentication which my
> mail server requires but the Send function does not appear to include.
>
> I've tried a POP read first but it doesn't help.
>
> I've done a fair bit of RFMing but no luck.
>
> The documentation for SM
21 matches
Mail list logo
