[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Robert M. Münch
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:27:07 -0300 (BRT), Bruno G. Albuquerque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please do. Unfortunatelly what I need is a lot simpler than what STELL > provides so there is no point in using it (although STEEL looks really > cool). Hi, it's the slim part of what Max calls STEEL. B

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Paul Tretter
ginal Message - From: "Gregg Irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bruno G. Albuquerque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:30 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Source code modules. > It's not hard to write a "loader" that brings all your

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Paul Tretter
ginal Message - From: "Gregg Irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bruno G. Albuquerque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:30 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Source code modules. > It's not hard to write a "loader" that brings all your

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Romano Paolo Tenca
Hi, > I guess the real problem I have is that I don't know how to "include" the > code that is in a module file in a way it would be bound to a context. For > instance, I would like to create a file that would have the following > function defind on it: > > test: func [ ] [ > print "Hello" >

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Bruno G. Albuquerque
; >> -Original Message- >> From: Bruno G. Albuquerque [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 12:27 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [REBOL] Re: Source code modules. >> >> >> >> Hey Gregg. >> >> Please do.

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch
em or part of the solution, but in the end, being part of the problem is much more fun." > -Original Message- > From: Bruno G. Albuquerque [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 12:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: Source code

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules. [slim]

2004-03-31 Thread Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch
--Original Message- > From: Gregg Irwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:31 AM > To: Bruno G. Albuquerque > Subject: [REBOL] Re: Source code modules. > > > > Hi Bruno, > > BGA> So, I am working on one project where I will need a way

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Bruno G. Albuquerque
Mauro Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:51 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [REBOL] Re: Source code modules. >> >> >> >> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:47:41 -0300 (BRT), Bruno G. Albuquerque >> <[EMAIL PROTE

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Bruno G. Albuquerque
Hey Gregg. Please do. Unfortunatelly what I need is a lot simpler than what STELL provides so there is no point in using it (although STEEL looks really cool). I guess the real problem I have is that I don't know how to "include" the code that is in a module file in a way it would be bound to a

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Gregg Irwin
Hi Bruno, BGA> So, I am working on one project where I will need a way to create BGA> "modules" of Rebol code that will be loaded by a main script. How would I BGA> go about loading those modules from disk in a way that would be easy to BGA> access that code in the main script? If you have the

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch
Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: Source code modules. > > > > On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:47:41 -0300 (BRT), Bruno G. Albuquerque > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello. > > > > So, I am working

[REBOL] Re: Source code modules.

2004-03-31 Thread Mauro Fontana
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:47:41 -0300 (BRT), Bruno G. Albuquerque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello. > > So, I am working on one project where I will need a way to create > "modules" of Rebol code that will be loaded by a main script. How would > I > go about loading those modules from disk in