[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-15 Thread RebOldes
Hello Jason and Pekr, Sunday, October 13, 2002, 12:54:35 AM, you wrote: JC> Petr Krenzelok wrote: >> OK, I know flash is the option - the problem is that I don't have >> designer fluent at Flash right now. Anyway, thanks for the tip. OTOH I JC> I'm available if you are interested.. me too >>

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread Jason Cunliffe
Petr Krenzelok wrote: > OK, I know flash is the option - the problem is that I don't have > designer fluent at Flash right now. Anyway, thanks for the tip. OTOH I I'm available if you are interested.. > think that flash is overhyped, well - that's just me :-) If I would use > something for really

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread Christopher Ross-Gill
Hi Petr, > I will look for what it offers, but the last thing I want MS to get my > support is to use their WindowsOS. Call me a former Amiga freak, but I > kinda like a freedom of choice. Mozilla is the way to go for me, if > possible. What is more - IE is NOT cross-platform and in the case we go

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread Andy Finkel
Hi Petr: If you don't mind only running your Kiosk on Linux, you can make most of the browsers (or other applications) full screen/no borders/no gadgets with controls under rebol program control by customzing a window manager (like TWM) and using that with the X Window system. Andy > -Orig

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread jose
> Maybe we could try to embed mozilla? That way our > Rebol apps could > feature faces, which would be able to display web > content, including > plug-ins. Rebol browser anyone? :-) Well, - what is > more - Mozilla is > cross-platform and pretty feature rich for what is > needed. There is no >

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread Petr Krenzelok
jose wrote: > Back then, their software allows us to "lock" the browser (MSIE) and define starting page etc. I'm sure they have more to offer now. Pekr, There is a pretty good solution for free from M$, if you can afford to use Windows We probably can affor Windows. If we will be

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread Petr Krenzelok
Jason Cunliffe wrote: Hi Petr I will read your post more carefully.. but my first reaction since I have also thought about REBOL and kiosks is: REBOL - invisible back-end network and database engineering FLASH - visible front-end user interface With Oldes' %make-swf.r you can use Rebol to dyna

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread jose
> Back then, their software allows us to "lock" the > browser (MSIE) and define > starting page etc. > I'm sure they have more to offer now. Pekr, There is a pretty good solution for free from M$, if you can afford to use Windows The steps to get your custom solution n. 2 working are: 1) G

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread Jason Cunliffe
Hi Petr I will read your post more carefully.. but my first reaction since I have also thought about REBOL and kiosks is: REBOL - invisible back-end network and database engineering FLASH - visible front-end user interface With Oldes' %make-swf.r you can use Rebol to dynamically a lot of Flash a

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread Lok Yek Soon
At 09:51 AM 10/12/2002 +0200, you wrote: >Hello, > >part of our project is gonna be - KIOSK systems. We just looked into some >at Invex computer show. They are pretty expensive, so we will eventually >produce few kiosk systems ourselves. However - the questioin is - >software. We can go severa

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread Gregg Irwin
Hi Pekr, Two things come to mind. They aren't answers to your questions, but just some thoughts based on my experience. 1) For debugging purposes, you want to be ablel to plug in a keyboard and get to the OS very easily. 2) If you're planning for it all to be touch screen based, everything they

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread Petr Krenzelok
bryan wrote: C) what we saw during the show was - external configurable environments, with embedded browser (mostly IE I think). Well IE did make an initial push towards developers for the KIOSK market, tied in with Windows CE I believe, so that would be logical. A propos XUL, I s

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread bryan
>C) what we saw during the show was - external configurable environments, >with embedded browser (mostly IE I think). Well IE did make an initial push towards developers for the KIOSK market, tied in with Windows CE I believe, so that would be logical. A propos XUL, I started with that when it

[REBOL] Re: rebol and kiosk systems embedding ...

2002-10-12 Thread Petr Krenzelok
Just replying to myself but maybe as a reference for others - there seem to be more to the mozilla than one could think - it seems to become a platform rather than being simple browser :-) http://www.mozdev.org/projects.html - what a bunch of projects ... I don't know why, but e.g. XUL XML UI d