Don
Very clear and wise comments
Thanks. David hollinsworth
--
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of
- Original Message -
From: David Hollinsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 23 March 2000 7:41 P.M.
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Personal attacks
Don
Very clear and wise comments
Thanks. David hollinsworth
--
RecOzNet2
not be appeased.
Laurie.
Laurie and Desley Forde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Irene Watson wrote.
-Original Message-
From: irene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Personal attac
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 20 March 2000 9:57 A.M.
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Personal attacks
Trudy,
Along with Tim, I just don't actually see what rules Laurie has
broken. Can you perhaps post them for us, or direct us to them?
Also, to take the burden of this sort
what about the racist views - they are attack upon my being and soul even
though they are supplanted in generalities.rather than personalised
--
From: Trudy and Rod Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RecOzNet2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [recoznet2] Personal attacks
Date: Saturday, March
[recoznet2] Personal attacks
Tim,
I'd like to draw your attention to the fact that they are not just my
reasons. There are others on this list who have no trouble with the
rules and expect them to be followed. They were there from the
beginning.
I think to ban flaming is the least we can ask from
I'd just like to put in a request for the re-admission of Laurie, if she is
interested. I'm sympathetic to your reasons, Trudy, but calling racists
racists seems a reasonable thing to do. So while I agree we should try and
keep discussion above slanging match level, some sort of defacto
Tim,
I'd like to draw your attention to the fact that they are not just my
reasons. There are others on this list who have no trouble with the
rules and expect them to be followed. They were there from the
beginning.
I think to ban flaming is the least we can ask from each other and as
for who
Trudy wrote:
Tim,
I'd like to draw your attention to the fact that they are not just my
reasons. There are others on this list who have no trouble with the
rules and expect them to be followed. They were there from the
beginning.
I think to ban flaming is the least we can ask from each other
Tim,
I'd like to draw your attention to the fact that they are not just my
reasons. There are others on this list who have no trouble with the
rules and expect them to be followed. They were there from the
beginning.
True enough, and nothing I said was designed to suggest that we shouldn't
have
Hi everyoneI've just got to work on Monday morning and realised my
father (Laurie is definitely a 'he', not a 'she') has been excluded from
the list. Trudy I understand your need to keep the emails on a non-abusive
and professional level, but I have to say the comments sent in Laurie's
Hello
some time ago I asked the
list for help in not receiving a contribution from one person (I wonder
who!!!), and was given some helpful advice so when mail comes from the
person I dont want to hear from it is automatically in my trash can.
If anyone else wants this
help email me off the
No, Susanne, that is what made me decide to contact Laurie. It was her
expressed intention to use personal attack (rather than attack a point
of view) as a way to further the cause of Indigenous Australians and her
intention to do so on the list whenever she felt justified that made me
decide to
13 matches
Mail list logo
