[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote:
Have you checked the price if Windows tools?
Look at Delphi, C++ Builder, or any MS Visual *
product. Klyix is on par with the Professional versions
of those tools, and priced better.
True ... but just as Windows products are
Not sure this is quite the correct forum but anyway ...
How come the latest kernel security update [RHSA-2001:013-05] does not
include a kernel-headers-2.2.17-14.*.rpm package. The notice says get the
previous kernel-headers-2.2.16-3 package but that does not exist on
ftp.redhat.com.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The cost of doing development on Linux with Kylix is already more
expensive than the traditional Linux developer. A Kylix developer will
only be competitive if they can produce better code faster than
someone not using Kylix. I have watched high school students do
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, John Summerfield wrote:
Instead of speculating how good Kylix is, sit down and use it for a week. Then
you will have a sound basis for commenting.
I haven't used Kylix, but having used C++ Builder and JBuilder for years
year, I don't doubt that it is an outstanding
Hello...
1: This is a 'devel' list, not a system help list
Owen Thomas wrote:
I have my windows box connected to my redhat (on which i did a full
server install) and whenever I try to ftp into it I get the message
"Connection failed - /ip address /- connection refused"
In
I have a quick question for everyone, I have to write an installation script
for a piece of software on linux, however, this product is supported on
multiple distribution types. I need some definitive way of determining a
SYSTYPE variable to the tune of
cat /path/to/item | grep Redhat
Try "/etc/redhat-release".
- Matt
Jesse Noller wrote:
I have a quick question for everyone, I have to write an installation script
for a piece of software on linux, however, this product is supported on
multiple distribution types. I need some definitive way of
perhaps the existance of /etc/redhat-release? However, do you actually need
to
determine whether the system is redhat, or do you need to look for specific
characteristics
of the system? It seems that it would make much more sense to look for
things such as
/etc/sysconfig/whatever or
Do you have the wu-ftpd package installed?
Look in /etc/hosts.allow or hosts.deny if there is a restriction.
Also use ntsysv to enable ftp service and the to a
/etc/init.d/xinted restart
Good luck
Oliver
Owen Thomas wrote:
I have my windows box connected to my redhat (on which i did a full
Thanks Matt, I was looking for something more generic (redhat centric) but,
hey, I asked a redhat devel list, didn't I?
;)
-Jesse
-Original Message-
From: Matt Fahrner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: System Type
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Matt, I was looking for something more generic (redhat centric) but,
hey, I asked a redhat devel list, didn't I?
To the best of my knowledge, there's no single thing that all
distributions respect. I'm sure there are many distributions that
have
Thornton Prime [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lest they blame the Linux community for poor sales, as we have seen
happen with Adobe, Corel, and other vendors.
Corel can blame the community all they want, but if they didn't
release such obscenely buggy software, or if they bothered to fix it,
or
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:13:43PM -0500, Alan Shutko wrote:
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The best way to do things like this is to check for specific cases
that you care about (eg. locations of init scripts) and take actions
on that, rather than having a database of "this dist
Joseph Malicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RHL7 at least lets you have a separate /usr/src/linux so that, if
done right, products like VMware can find the headers of the running
kernel.
VMware lets you tell it where the kernel source is, so if you put it
on
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Summerfield
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 6:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Missing kernel-headers in latest 2.2.17 update?
The correct kernel headers to have in place are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Do you have the wu-ftpd package installed? Look in /etc/hosts.allow
or hosts.deny if there is a restriction.
'Connection refused" means nobody's listening. You get other errors if the
above is the problem.
btw I did a server install of RHL 6.2 and decided it was
I am trying to rebuild the kernel after applying a patch using 'make
bzdisk' to build a boot image on the floppy to test the kernel before
overwriting the previous one. It terminates with an error with VFS
stating that it could not load the root fs 08:25. I am unable to find
any documentation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am trying to rebuild the kernel after applying a patch using 'make
bzdisk' to build a boot image on the floppy to test the kernel before
overwriting the previous one. It terminates with an error with VFS
stating that it could not load the root fs 08:25. I am
18 matches
Mail list logo
