On 17 Jan 2001, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "BR" == Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BR> kernel-utils is obsolete, use the new ksymoops package.
>
> I'm curious: is there some way to cope with packages changing names or
> splitting other than doing it by hand? Obviou
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:41:01PM +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> And so is konqueror - 7.1 will have at least 4 usable open source browsers
> (Mozilla, konqueror, lynx, links).
No w3m?
--
Rodger Donaldson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Windows is the answer, but only if the questio
> From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 19:41:01 +0100 (CET)
>
> On 8 Jan 2001, Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
>
> And so is konqueror - 7.1 will have at least 4 usable open source browsers
> (Mozilla, konqueror, lynx, links).
Which of these currently have RPMs and
On 8 Jan 2001, Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
>
> Few comments about the latest rawhide release (2001-01-03).
>
> - printtool is now gone. You should make printool a symlink to
> lprngtool.
Is this an ncurses based tool or yet another USELESS GUI thing?
--
..Tom
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:31:02PM -0200, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini wrote:
> how about just creating a package for it (netscape-flash)?
With a package description like:
"Install this if you want to provide all your personal data to any
website how decides to have interest in it. Ah, and please
On Monday 08 January 2001 16:46, you wrote:
>
> Apropos Netscape. I'm all for an security errata update which removes
> the Flash plugin!
>
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel
how about just creating a package for it (netscape-flash)?
___
Redhat-devel-list ma
John Summerfield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > No way. We don't ship anything that is not open source.
>
> Netscape?
Netscape is an unfortunate historical case.
Bill
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:56:19PM +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> I don't think many people are stupid enough to run Netscape as root.
> Mostly everyone is "stupid" enough to run X as root. ;)
"rm -rf $HOME/." is no fun either. Or spying data of your $HOME.
> Probably not until a new ver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> No way. We don't ship anything that is not open source.
Netscape?
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information.
Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites index.
Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for m
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:41:01PM +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > No way. We don't ship anything that is not open source.
> > What tells you this module does anything other than sending your
> > /etc/shadow to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
>
> Same goes f
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:41:01PM +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> No way. We don't ship anything that is not open source.
> What tells you this module does anything other than sending your
> /etc/shadow to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Same goes for Netscape. :-]
[Yes, I know...]
Apropos Netscape.
On 8 Jan 2001, Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
> - printtool is now gone. You should make printool a symlink to
> lprngtool.
Agreed.
> - /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o needs an upgrade. It
> doesn't work with Matrox G450/dual head/16MB. Accepting the license
> agreement at
> htt
Few comments about the latest rawhide release (2001-01-03).
- printtool is now gone. You should make printool a symlink to
lprngtool.
- /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o needs an upgrade. It
doesn't work with Matrox G450/dual head/16MB. Accepting the license
agreeme
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> No need to report this particular bug though, I've fixed it.
... well ... actually, one might report, and then annotate the
report with a comment like Bero's, and then close it. A
Reporter may do this ...
Why? Because Bugzilla entries, when
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Frank Heldt wrote:
> I thought bugzilla.redhat.com is not for rawhide, or was i wrong?
I believe you are incorrect.
I do not work for Red Hat, but ... if a package is listed in
Bugzilla, I file a report, with full version and patch level,
there.
.. Reports in email are too
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Frank Heldt wrote:
> I thought bugzilla.redhat.com is not for rawhide, or was i wrong?
It is for rawhide as well as any release.
No need to report this particular bug though, I've fixed it.
LLaP
bero
___
Redhat-devel-list mailin
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Frank Heldt wrote:
> I thought bugzilla.redhat.com is not for rawhide, or was i wrong?
There is a Rawhide section in there too :-)
---
Red Hat Raw Hide
For bugs about Red Hat Raw Hide
---
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of d
I thought bugzilla.redhat.com is not for rawhide, or was i wrong?
Regards
Frank
- Original Message -
From: "Pekka Savola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: bug in irda-utils from latest rawhide
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Frank Heldt wrote:
> Hello RedHat's,
>
> the irda-utils rpm from the latest rawhide contains a bug in
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/irda
> which prevents the script from starting. See the appended patch...
>
> Happy hacking
> Frank
>
> --- irda.org
Hello RedHat's,
the irda-utils rpm from the latest rawhide contains a bug in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/irda
which prevents the script from starting. See the appended patch...
Happy hacking
Frank
--- irda.org Mon Dec 25 00:45:04 2000
+++ irda Fri Jan 5 13:11:47 2001
@@ -36,10 +36,10 @@
[ -f
Where did you get the idea that running rawhide was a good idea?
Excerpt from README.rawhide:
"Raw Hide Can Be a Bit Tough to Chew on So Run at Your Own Risk (and
Enjoyment)
These releases have not been quality tested by Red Hat's Quality
Assurance
team. They may not boot. If they boot, they ma
The latest build moved my root partition after random number generation
died due to hard swap lockup surfing while trying to use a mirror.and
this is the ~120th time rawhide update has destroyed my installation.
Using ftp.belnet.be to redownload the whole rawhide build w/56/k
modem.. Last downloa
Things broke - gnucash didn't like 1.4, for example.
Matt
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 10:26:51AM -0300, Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> What is the reason for not keeping the latest guile
> release (1.4) on Rawhide, as it was in the previous
> Rawhide release, and moving back to guile-1.3.4?
>
> Ro
What is the reason for not keeping the latest guile
release (1.4) on Rawhide, as it was in the previous
Rawhide release, and moving back to guile-1.3.4?
Romildo
--
Prof. José Romildo Malaquias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Departamento de Computação
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
Brasil
___
On Thu, 04 May 2000, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Svante Signell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > According to ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide the latest release is
> > rawhide-release-2000418 containing kernel-2.3.99-4 while mirrors,
> > for example ftp.sunet.se has rawhide-release-2000424 with
> > kernel-2
Svante Signell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> According to ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide the latest release is
> rawhide-release-2000418 containing kernel-2.3.99-4 while mirrors,
> for example ftp.sunet.se has rawhide-release-2000424 with
> kernel-2.2.14-11!!
>
> Whats up?
Should be resolved sometime
I found it on another server:
ftp://ftp.fi.muni.cz/pub/linux/redhat-rawhide/i386/RedHat/RPMS/
Kirk
>At 08:35 PM 5/4/00 +0200, you wrote:
>According to ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide the latest release is
>rawhide-release-2000418 containing kernel-2.3.99-4 while mirrors,
>for example ftp.sunet.se has
According to ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide the latest release is
rawhide-release-2000418 containing kernel-2.3.99-4 while mirrors,
for example ftp.sunet.se has rawhide-release-2000424 with
kernel-2.2.14-11!!
Whats up?
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Hello redhat's,
just a little suggestion:
The libelf (0.6.4) from rawhide is a little bit outdated.
sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/libs/libelf-0.7.0.tar.gz is the latest one.
Regards,
Frank
--
Frank Heldt
Mahr GmbH, Entwicklung
+49 551 7073-511
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PR
Hello,
I think that Netscape is much more stable when I use the latest Rawhide
Netscape packages (release 6). Cool.
However, I can't make it find any plug-ins in the
/usr/lib/netscape/plugins directory. E.g., it can't find my Flash
plug-in.
--
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhage
30 matches
Mail list logo
