Re: general request (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-20 Thread John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I ask. like more support from rh for postfix when even rh use it why > it's not included in the core distro (just sendmail) > They conflict, which isn't acceptable for the core components. Thus, > postfix stays in Powertools FTTB. When I installed mandrake 7.2, it gav

Re: general request (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-17 Thread Levente Farkas
Alan Shutko wrote: > > Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Way too many use "everything" - anyway, it's a policy not to have such > > > conflicts in the main. Everything can be installed at once, if you > > > really want to. > > > > hmm I don't think so. may be way too many use "d

Re: general request (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-17 Thread Pekka Savola
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Levente Farkas wrote: > > > what I'd like to see, that if I already have an installed mta (not > > > all just "suppoted") than the next distro's updater do _not_ install > > > sendmail which overwrites eg /usr/sbin/sendmail. > > > > Does this(sendmail upgrades postfix) happen

Re: general request (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-17 Thread Alan Shutko
Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Way too many use "everything" - anyway, it's a policy not to have such > > conflicts in the main. Everything can be installed at once, if you > > really want to. > > hmm I don't think so. may be way too many use "default". if it's true > it's high t

Re: general request (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-17 Thread Levente Farkas
> > when it is requested by many (ok what does it mean "many") people that > > put it into (at least) preview. > > I don't think we'll disable it unless some really good reason shows > up... disable what ? > > > They conflict, which isn't acceptable for the core components. Thus, > > > postfix

Re: general request (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-17 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > > > Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > but (as always) I prefer freedom and the chance for choice. that's what > > > I realy request from rh (and waiting for it). if there is more jurnaling fs > > >

Re: general request (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-17 Thread Levente Farkas
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > but (as always) I prefer freedom and the chance for choice. that's what > > I realy request from rh (and waiting for it). if there is more jurnaling fs > > than give _me_ the chance to choice. > > Sure, when they'

Re: general request (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-17 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > but (as always) I prefer freedom and the chance for choice. that's what > I realy request from rh (and waiting for it). if there is more jurnaling fs > than give _me_ the chance to choice. Sure, when they're ready. > that's another quiestion that me

general request (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-17 Thread Levente Farkas
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > Dax Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Bernhard Rosenkraenzer said once upon a time (Tue, 16 Jan 2001): > > > > > It isn't - it's what we're doing (at least until at least one of the > > > journalling FSes is really ready for prime time). > > > > I predict