Steven Lord wrote:
> This is true, but if you use the rpms and need that the same applies.
Redhat includes the RAID patches in their SRPMs. Hence the need for a new
SRPM/RPM from Redhat for the kernel. I'd rather have them add in their
patches and QA it than waste my time adding them to the 2.2
But if you depend on certain Redhat patches (eg. RAID) then just using the
source can be a bit problematic...
This is true, but if you use the rpms and need that the same applies. Either
way your on a one way trip to patch city. An efficient kernel contains the
bare minimum, with modules for othe
> I would strongly suggest that you get the source and compile it yourself.
> It's not as scary as you think. Linuxdoc (www.linuxdoc.org) has a kernel
> howto. RPM's are generally pre-compiled with patches and stuff that can make
> it a bit ugly. Example: Mandrake kernel RPM's are fine if you have
I would strongly suggest that you get the source and compile it yourself.
It's not as scary as you think. Linuxdoc (www.linuxdoc.org) has a kernel
howto. RPM's are generally pre-compiled with patches and stuff that can make
it a bit ugly. Example: Mandrake kernel RPM's are fine if you have a
penti
A serious security bug in kernels < 2.2.16 was reported two days ago.
When will updated rpms be available?
Bob T.
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
