Hello List...
Howto modify .vimrc so that:
if FileExtension == htm or html or jsp or php
set sts=2
else
set sts=3
end if
(?)
thanks
/j-p.
---
JUSTATEST Art Online
www.justatest.com
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 24 February 2002 01:39 am, Allen Wayne Best wrote:
> hello all:
>
> does anyone know how to change the "apparent" max password size in RH
> 7.2? i have found that one can change a password to more than 8
> characters, but the password will n
hello all:
does anyone know how to change the "apparent" max password size in RH 7.2? i
have found that one can change a password to more than 8 characters, but the
password will not work when the user attempts to login. for instance, the
user may change the password to "foobaron" and that wil
That's a normal occurance.. send the message through the server and the
other party will eventually get it. No way around it, really. You'll
prolly find similar problems getting away messages, etc. It's moreso a
networking issue. Firewalls/gateways block a lot of direct connections
between net
hello,
my server currently using redhat 6.2 with pentium3 550mhz, and i wanna
upgrade it to pentium4 something.
is there any problem on my redhat 6.2 after changed the cpu and motherboard?
because i afraid the cpu arch changed and the redhat 6.2 no more working.
thx.
_
Yes the box is setup to look for first floppy, cdrom, hdd
- Original Message -
From: "David Kramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [REDHAT] Cannot boot from the RH 7.2 CD
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Phil G wrote:
>
> > Hello,
"Adam Holisky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing that you might want to know is that AT&T (well, MediaOne or
> RoadRunner or what ever it is in Minnesota right now) blocks port 80 and
> 25. So no HTTP or SMTP going over it.. but that can be worked around and
> setup on 8080 orsomething else.
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Phil G wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just recently downloaded the iso's from redhats ftp site and
> burned them onto a cd. Everything went ok, the cd burned ok.
>
> My problem is that when I try to boot from cd1 it just does not detect
> that the cd is bootable. Has anyone el
One thing that you might want to know is that AT&T (well, MediaOne or
RoadRunner or what ever it is in Minnesota right now) blocks port 80 and
25. So no HTTP or SMTP going over it.. but that can be worked around and
setup on 8080 orsomething else. It's intresting to note that they do not
bloc
Hello,
I have just recently downloaded the iso's from
redhats ftp site and burned them onto a cd. Everything went ok, the cd burned
ok.
My problem is that when I try to boot from cd1 it
just does not detect that the cd is bootable. Has anyone else experienced this
problem? How did you g
Okay, this seems impossible to me...at least in a number senseit just doesn't
make sense, but I'll ask anyway.
As of today I have both DSL service (256K) as well as Cable (1.5Mb/128K). As you
can tell, the upstream on the cable is puny and unfortunate for me since I tend to
trans
From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My cable connections goes into a LinkSys modem first, and from there
it connects through ethernet to whichever computer I want it on. I figured
I may be able to just connect the linux box to it, and have the second NIC
handle the internal netwo
Ed Wilts wrote:
> What I have since done - and what I'd do again if I had to start over - is
> to install a firewall/router like a Linksys and let it handle the outside
> connectivity. Then connect your Linux system to it.
My cable connections goes into a LinkSys modem first, and from there
i have been send a message to my friend which using icq client on the windows box,
the problem is that message sometimes can delivered and sometimes can't,
and try to look my network windows(from licq) and found none of errors.
the strange thing is that i can receive a messages but can't send a me
> Does anyone have AT&T @home service coming in to their Linux machine,
and masqed machines behind that? Any caveats I need to be aware of before I
do this?
It just works but it does vary from area to area as to how they've set it
up. Here in MN it was trivial back when they were MediaOne.
Does anyone have AT&T @home service coming in to their Linux machine, and masqed
machines behind that? Any caveats I need to be aware of before I do this?
--
H | "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser." - John Gardner
+--
On 18:51 23 Feb 2002, Timothy Lee Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I think it would be great to know how to copy-inhibit files, if anything just
| for the sake of knowledge.
To copy inhibit files you just remove read permission. Works every time!
Seriously, that's all there is.
--
Cameron Sim
I think it would be great to know how to copy-inhibit files, if anything just
for the sake of knowledge. With Novell servers, you can copy-inhibit files,
which is great to help protect files installed on the network.
On Saturday 23 February 2002 05:46 pm, you wrote:
> On 23:09 23 Feb 2002,
if i want to install a .rpm that has unsatisfied dependencies, and those
packages in turn are all in the current directory, is there some
straghtforward way to tell them to install themselves as necessary?
and, same question if the packages are in a ftp directory.
___
[ Please reply _below_ the relevant quoted material. Thanks. ]
On 13:28 23 Feb 2002, Rupendra Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| thanks that solved the problem
| permissions were:
| -rwx--1 root root46224 Aug 28 13:16
Good.
| but how did it happen i never entered the /li
> > > Any other good, reliable, frequently updated archives around?
One of my favorite archive sites is http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/. You'll
find *many* lists there and the redhat lists are current. One of the my
postings to redhat-list earlier today is already in the archives. Not only
that,
On 23:09 23 Feb 2002, Lewi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:58:59AM -0500, rpjday wrote:
| > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
| > > it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can
| > > be see the contents.
| > not likely, since if someone can list the
--- Charles Galpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 13:51, Monte Milanuk wrote:
>
> > Any other good, reliable, frequently updated archives around?
>
> http://www.prairienet.org/library/redhat should be updated nightly.
>
Any hints to as a place that mirrors the other lists
Hi all,
Im trying to setup a printer on my redhat box, I don't use any monitor on
the PC, just SSH into it via another PC.
when I run "printtool" it comes back with the following error -
No display information -- gtk_init not called
Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:
I presume this is becau
Could you describe this problem a little further? :)
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
> I just want to know does someone have a problem with licq about sending message to
>other side using icq?
> because I have that problem, how to resolve this kind of problem?
>
>
> I'm on enigma at home
>
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 13:51, Monte Milanuk wrote:
> Any other good, reliable, frequently updated archives around?
http://www.prairienet.org/library/redhat should be updated nightly.
The index is sufficiently large to make updating on the fly too resource
intensive. In fact Chuck had the moongr
On Friday 22 February 2002 20:47, Michael Oatman wrote:
> Obviously, this is not true in Linux, where one
> must not put the pipe, but merely the "&" alone
> after the command.
>
> I wonder if there's a compendium anywhere of
> things that Linus changed when making Linux?
>
> I would imagine it wo
Mike - Nero 5.5 works as you explained, but I had 5.0 which doesn't support .iso file
but there is a work around described at this link
http://www.linuxiso.org/neroburning.html
Gene
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/22/02 23:04 PM >>>
Gene, that's weird you had to do something
special to get Nero wo
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
> it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can be see the
>contents.
>
> any suggestions?
If it's an executable, you can change the program so that it will only run
from a particular directory.
---
Thanks, Ashley.
I had forgotten about the 5%.
A quick trip through /var/* revealed the presence of a number of large spool files
leftover from trying to get Star Office to cooperate with cups.
I then moved /var onto another partition.
Of course, the *real* solution is more drive space. ;-)
--
--- Brian Ashe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Monte,
>
> Saturday, February 23, 2002, 1:08:19 PM, you textually orated:
>
> MM> Anyone know whats up w/ the official list archives? They haven't
> been
> MM> updated since the 15th or so.
>
> Does anyone use those. ;)
>
Well, actually I do
Hello Monte,
Saturday, February 23, 2002, 1:08:19 PM, you textually orated:
MM> Anyone know whats up w/ the official list archives? They haven't been
MM> updated since the 15th or so.
Does anyone use those. ;)
Try the ones kept at...
http://www.prairienet.org/library/redhat/
Have fun,
--
_
Anyone know whats up w/ the official list archives? They haven't been
updated since the 15th or so.
Thanks,
Monte
=
"All right, breaks over. Back on your heads! ;)"
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http:/
I just want to know does someone have a problem with licq about sending message to
other side using icq?
because I have that problem, how to resolve this kind of problem?
I'm on enigma at home
--
ichtus
--
Lewi Supranata .K
ICQ: 50643061
msg72661/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
A way that would work for special cases is taking away all but owner read
permissions, then using a SUID bit on the program{s} that are allowed to
actually read the file. If these programs don't provide a way to make
another copy of the file, and don't just output the file to the screen in a
way
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:01:36PM -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner said:
> Yeah, I argued that point as well...they don't care. They want them blocked,
> regardless of the (Corporate) Company being a US based company with offices around
>the
> world. And for those outside of the US, using any typ
Folks,
My employer uses the Nortel Contivity VPN Client for remote access over DSL.
I have an IP Tables firewall (using SmoothWall), but I cannot connect
through the firewall. I see UDP port 500 going out to my employer's VPN
connection. I've taken a PC and configured it to run directly connect
Are you sure its the authentication that taking the time, or the
connection? If you were to telnet/ssh into the box, does it take many
seconds to get the login prompt? If this is the case, try adding an entry
to /etc/hosts for the machine that is trying to access the box.
Frank
At 04:27 PM 2/2
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
> i think so too, but just an idea if that possible if just restrict cp command
> to read file.
You could always make cp a non-user executable command, and allow access
with sudo. Course, that breaks most things...
___
Depends on what your trying to keep in tact. Cat file1 > file2 will
copy all contents but the file image and timestamp has changed. So if
your using any sort of original verification schemes you could detect a
illegal copy. However, if your trying to prevent people from simply own
the file on t
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:58:59AM -0500, rpjday wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
>
> > it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can
> > be see the contents.
> >
> > any suggestions?
>
> not likely, since if someone can list the contents, they can always
> jus
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
> it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can be
> see the contents.
If I can view the contents, I can copy it.
cat file1 > file2
Hey presto, copied without using cp, and only by viewing it.
__
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
> it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can
> be see the contents.
>
> any suggestions?
not likely, since if someone can list the contents, they can always
just redirect the output to a destination file of their choice.
rday
it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can be see the
contents.
any suggestions?
--
ichtus
--
Lewi Supranata .K
ICQ: 50643061
msg72651/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> I'm going to install kernel 2.4.17 (from source), and I have the
> necessary versions of everything (according to Documentation/Changes)
> except e2fsprogs. I have e2fsprogs-1.23-1.7.1, and need at least
> 1.25.
>
> Would I be safe to use 1.26-1 from Rawhide 1.0? I've never done much
> with Ra
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:14:27PM -0600, Vidiot wrote:
> If you think that is going to keep that government out, you are dreaming.
> All a user has to do is log into a site that it outside the range you
> block and bam, there they are.
>
> It is a lost cause.
Advocatus Diaboli: They may have b
Hey,
I'm going to install kernel 2.4.17 (from source), and I have the
necessary versions of everything (according to Documentation/Changes)
except e2fsprogs. I have e2fsprogs-1.23-1.7.1, and need at least
1.25.
Would I be safe to use 1.26-1 from Rawhide 1.0? I've never done much
with Rawhide,
You might want to consider a PDA with embedded Linux. You would save from
having to load the OS that way. A good place to start is:
http://www.redhat.com/solutions.embedded/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of pochy
> Sent: Thursday, Fe
48 matches
Mail list logo
