Canna, Evolution and GtkHML errata updates

2003-08-14 Thread Bernd Bartmann
dated recently. What are the differences in this advisories compared to the earlier releases? I can't find any new rpms listed nor any information in the advisory text what exactly has been changed. Best regards. - -- Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Bernd Bartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I.S. Security and Network

Re: Latest xinetd errata upgrade with smaller version number thanthe old one?

2002-12-03 Thread Bernd Bartmann
Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:02:52 +0100, Bernd Bartmann wrote: Anyone else noticed that the new xinetd errata from 2002-12-02 has a smaller version number (xinetd-2.3.7-4.7x.i386.rpm) than the old one from 2002-10-14 (xinetd-2.3.9-0.73.i386.rpm)? Do you see any problem

Latest xinetd errata upgrade with smaller version number than theold one?

2002-12-03 Thread Bernd Bartmann
Anyone else noticed that the new xinetd errata from 2002-12-02 has a smaller version number (xinetd-2.3.7-4.7x.i386.rpm) than the old one from 2002-10-14 (xinetd-2.3.9-0.73.i386.rpm)? -- Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Bernd Bartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SoHaNet Technology GmbH / Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee

Problem setting up NIS Server on RedHat 5.1

1998-06-01 Thread Bernd Bartmann
nit -m or simply run make. I am really frustrated now. Can anyone help me? Thanks in advance! Bernd Bartmann -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists To unsubscribe: mail [E