hat they want. As long as they are doing good installs,
they are doing their job and I won't complain. Our job is to get demand to
the point where the price comes down.
--
Brady Montz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
27;t turn out to be an issue for me. I have the DSL
gateway box and my two linux machines on one 10 base T hub, and DSL is slow
enough that it's still the limiting factor.
I think though that the original poster was connecting out via ethernet, so it
might become a problem then. I
direct
> them if it's told to do so...
>
> I don't know how to do this however, since they are on the same interface...
I did this at home for a while, and it worked just fine.
--
Brady Montz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bill Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5 Apr 2000, Brady Montz wrote:
>
> > In my case, the NFS servers were linux machines. I have two linux
> > machines, and tried NFS upgrades in both directions. I had the RedHat dist
> > in /vol/RedHat, /vol being it
hat don't know, hosts.deny is used by tcpd (the tcp wrapper
daemon), which in turn is used by inetd, which is the daemon which spawns off
various network things like the telnet daemon. Tcpd uses hosts.deny and
hosts.allow to decide whether or not that particular client is allowed to open
a n
ce user improvements
> since my previous install of of 6.0 ... I figure, in less than a year, I
> won't have any winblows clients running at all! Hooray!
>
> Take care all,
> Mike
>
--
Brady Montz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
exports specifically?
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> >
> > Bill Carlson
> >
> > Systems Programmer[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Opinions are mine,
> > Virtual Hospital http://www.vh.org/| not my employer's.
> > Univ
stall program pops up a window saying it cannot
> mount that directory from the server. I need to get this working so
> I can do kickstart installs for our testing labs.
>
I've had the exact same problem. I ended up having to set up anonymous ftp for
the duration of the install.
--
Oops, I sent the last message without including the patch. Here we go again:
In case you haven't noticed, ytalk (and ntalk) doesn't behave nicely when
there are multiple network interfaces. The connection request packet has to
contain the IP address to reply to, and ytalk guess this by looking at
tribution after applying both patches included in that rpm.
I haven't gotten around to doing the same to ntalk.
--
Brady Montz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /maili
10 matches
Mail list logo
