Re: pwconv w/ more than 2500 users?

1998-06-24 Thread Dana Canfield
This is where our biggest performance hit comes into play. When we switched from NetBSD to Linux our machine came to a screeching halt because I way new to the ways of PAM, and the pitfalls of pwdb. On our old 200Mhz Pentium, POP connections alone were taking more than a second to authenticate (

Re: pwconv w/ more than 2500 users?

1998-06-24 Thread Dana Canfield
2987 users. Serving >100 pop connections per minute, plus web, Samba & Appletalk. Now what were all those magazines saying about Linux not being scalable? ramon wrote: > You have more than 2000 users on one machine? Holy Shit! That's a lot. > > On Wed, 24 Jun 1998

Re: pwconv w/ more than 2500 users?

1998-06-24 Thread Dana Canfield
James Youngman wrote: > >>>>> "dc" == Dana Canfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > dc> I tried doing 2000 users, then adding 500 more and running > dc> pwconv again. That didn't work. I'll try splitting it up and > dc> doing

Re: pwconv w/ more than 2500 users?

1998-06-24 Thread Dana Canfield
I tried doing 2000 users, then adding 500 more and running pwconv again. That didn't work. I'll try splitting it up and doing just 2000 at a time, then merging the shadowed files. Is that safe? James Youngman wrote: > >>>>> "dc" == Dana Canfield <[

pwconv w/ more than 2500 users?

1998-06-24 Thread Dana Canfield
Under Redhat 5.1 pwconv stops working with any more than about 2500 users. I need to convert a passwd file with about 4000 users. Any ideas? Also, if anyone knows if shadow passwords on a large passwd file incurr a siginificant performance hit, I'd be interested in hearing about that as well.

Re: Hardware comments (any problems?)

1998-06-23 Thread Dana Canfield
Rick Forrester wrote: > Am getting ready to upgrade my system; have in mind the following components. > Would appreciate any information about problems encountered working with RH > 5.1 and any of these components (or positives!). > > Motherboard:ASUS P2B Is this one of the motherboards wi

Two hardware problems with a Gateway server

1998-06-23 Thread Dana Canfield
I've just received a Gateway ALR-7200 server, and I'm having two sets of problems with the built-in hardware. 1) The SCSI controller is an AIC-7890, which is not recognized by the AIC-7xxx driver. I've got information on it from /proc/pci which I can send to the maintainers of the driver, but I

AIC-7xxx and Adaptec AIC-7890?

1998-06-18 Thread Dana Canfield
I just got a Gateway ALR-7200 Server and it has two Adaptec AIC-7890 controllers built into the motherboard. I cannot get redhat 5.1 to recognize these controllers. I know the 7890 is not on the list of supported Adaptec chipsets, but I suspect that the controller would work with AIC-7xxx driver

Re: Advice for 4000 mail users on a Red Hat 5.0 box

1998-05-18 Thread Dana Canfield
You can find one at summersoft.fay.ar.us., but watch out because it patches qmail to archive a copy of all mail by default. You probably will want to disable that patch (number 2, I believe) by editing the SPEC file before compiling. > I can't find a qmail SRPM or RPM package. Moreover, since