Red Hat generally only bumps up the main version number due to binary
icompatibilities. That being said, they could do this on a whim if they
like. It is merely a ploy to get people to go use their "Advanced" line of
products if they want product stability. A great way to aggrevate their
RHCE's
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:03:54PM -0800, nate wrote:
> I replied to the poster off-list ..but wanted to point out that
> certs in the UNIX/linux world are about worthless at the moment.
> I've been lookin for a job for 7 months, applied to about 70 positions,
> had about 20 interviews, came *real
I like kwrite on KDE... but Jedit is great, it works on both Windows and
Unix (it's written in java) and has some cool plugins.
James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL
I know this doesn't answer your question, but if this is a production
server, I would recommend _not_ installing Gnome and having the box in
runlevel 5.. In addtional to security problems, it's also a resource hog.
Cygwin has a XFree86 server you can run on your box, and then you can run
any GUI ap
Do a "man sudo".
James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
For a Linux distro with a "ports" like system, try Gentoo. www.gentoo.org.
James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/list
To get a status of all services:
service --status-all
James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394
DuSTiN KRySaK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/07/2003 01:41 PM
Please respond to redhat-list
To:
Todd,
Yes I have an *idea* of how much latency it would create. Unfortunately I
don't think Red Hat does.Folks want to follow what company X says, and
not what I personally believe. So right now when I have to tell people
that "Yes I know what Red Hat is saying, but they're wrong" it take
Ok, so I'm half right.
James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394
"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/19/2003 05:03 PM
Please respond to redhat-list
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
I always thought this means the speed of the IDE device as in 33, 66, 100,
133, etc. It's not referring to the speed of the motherboard's Front Side
Bus. In other words, you can ignore it since you have all SCSI drives.
James S. Martin, RHCE
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Was
It is my understanding that swap partitions are limited in size to 2GB,
yet Red Hat's documentation points that your swap partition should be 2x
the size of your physical memory. Therefore, if you have a 2GB + of RAM,
what is the best approach for sizing your swap partition? Using multiple
sw
11 matches
Mail list logo
