]>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: 2.4.0 upgrade
>
> Check the man page on "modules.conf". You can put logic in the file based
> on the current kernel version. I think this would be a cleaner way to go.
>
>
_
Check the man page on "modules.conf". You can put logic in the file based
on the current kernel version. I think this would be a cleaner way to go.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce A. Mallett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thats a good quesiton. I'm guessing that one would have to have two
After just posting I immediately began to wonder if it would also
work to just:
ln -s 8139too.o rtl8139.o
in your /lib/modules/2.4.0/net directory and then leave
your eth0 defined to rtl8139 as it is for the 2.2 kernel.
???
- Bruce
> p.s. any idea of how to load a module depending
Thats a good quesiton. I'm guessing that one would have to have two
versions of /etc/modules.conf, say for example /etc/modules.conf-2.2.16
and /etc/modules.conf-2.4.0. Then symlink one or the other to
/etc/modules.conf somewhere early in the boot process based on
`uname -r`
Anyone else know h
Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: 2.4.0 upgrade
> I had the same problem. It appears that it got renamed from rtl8139 to
8139too
> (or something like that).
>
> - Bruce
>
>
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL
that's what I had thought too, but I had the same amount of services
going, just did an upgrade or install of 6.2 andthen tried 7.0. The whole
computer only cost $20, it's a nice thing to be able to run NFS, Apache,
anonFTP, telnet, INN, PPPoE, ipchains, and many other things on a computer
like t
I had the same problem. It appears that it got renamed from rtl8139 to 8139too
(or something like that).
- Bruce
Kevin Holmquist wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I upgraded the kernel on one of my boxes to 2.4.0. The upgrade went smoothly
> except for one issue-- the kernel doesn't have a driver f
Did you compile or install via rpm? I used the rpms from rawhide. there is
a 8129.o but it doesn't work.
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Denis J. Cirulis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: 2.4.0 upgrade
> is it any slower? When I upgraded RH 6.0 to 6.2 it got a lot slower on my
> 486 with 8MB of RAM. RH 7 was even slower...
But it's not the kernel causing your slowdown issues if that's what you're
inferring. On an 8MB 486, any extra processes/services will cause a
noticable slowdown. 8MB RAM
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 03:51:24AM -0500, Justin Zygmont wrote:
jzygmont> is it any slower? When I upgraded RH 6.0 to 6.2 it got a lot slower on my
jzygmont> 486 with 8MB of RAM. RH 7 was even slower...
The question is : are you using custom or generic kernel, is this
kernel monolitic or modul
is it any slower? When I upgraded RH 6.0 to 6.2 it got a lot slower on my
486 with 8MB of RAM. RH 7 was even slower...
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Kevin Holmquist wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I upgraded the kernel on one of my boxes to 2.4.0. The upgrade went smoothly
> except for one issue-- the kerne
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 12:47:51AM -0700, Kevin Holmquist wrote:
kevinh> I upgraded the kernel on one of my boxes to 2.4.0. The upgrade went smoothly
kevinh> except for one issue-- the kernel doesn't have a driver for my realtek 8139
kevinh> nic.
kevinh>
kevinh> I tried compiling rtl8139.c from t
Hello all,
I upgraded the kernel on one of my boxes to 2.4.0. The upgrade went smoothly
except for one issue-- the kernel doesn't have a driver for my realtek 8139
nic.
I tried compiling rtl8139.c from the 2.2.16 kernel and a newer version from
scyld.com but gcc barfs on both versions.
Does any
13 matches
Mail list logo
