Re: Abit TX5 Motherboard success?

1998-04-07 Thread Yoink!
On Mon, 6 Apr 1998, Vicki Stanfield wrote: > Hi all. I bought an Abit TX5 motherboard this weekend with 2 > 64MB DIMMS. It appeared to work at first, but there were > IRQ conflicts and it didn't see all the memory. I got rid > of the IRQ conflicts that were reported by the BIOS and > was able

Re: LUNA: Abit TX5 motherboard success ?

1998-04-06 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Chris \"Gordo\" Key wrote > K13>Thanks to all who helped. My problem turned out to be that the > K13>SCSI card was conflicting. And, one that perplexes me still, I had > K13>to use the new serial cable even though the old one worked when I > K13>took it out of the system. B

Re: Abit TX5 motherboard success ?

1998-04-06 Thread Victoria Stanfield
Thanks to all who helped. My problem turned out to be that the SCSI card was conflicting. And, one that perplexes me still, I had to use the new serial cable even though the old one worked when I took it out of the system. Between those two fixes and adding the mem line again, it all works.

Re: Abit TX5 Motherboard success?

1998-04-06 Thread Paul Dekker
The box will perform better if it can cache all the ram in l2 cache, otherwise it has to go to system memory which is slower. The tx chipset (which the abit tx5 has) can only cache 64mb. A good non-PII chipset is the via vp2 (also known as the amd640). It's a socket7 board that can cache up to

Re: Abit TX5 Motherboard success?

1998-04-06 Thread Rick Forrester
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Well I have SDRAM which is 10 nanoseconds and cache is what 5-7 > nanoseconds? Not much of a performance hit unless I'm missing > something. I don't know much about this kind of stuff though, so > please feel free to point out any error in judgement. > --vicki >

Re: Abit TX5 Motherboard success?

1998-04-06 Thread Vicki Stanfield
Well I have SDRAM which is 10 nanoseconds and cache is what 5-7 nanoseconds? Not much of a performance hit unless I'm missing something. I don't know much about this kind of stuff though, so please feel free to point out any error in judgement. --vicki -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips,

Re: Abit TX5 Motherboard success?

1998-04-06 Thread Rick Forrester
Vicki, a couple of comments: 1. If this is an intel 430TX chipset based board then you're never going to be able to cache more than 64Mb of your RAM. There is a performance hit in this uncached memeory; and it's one of the reasons that I've stuck to my ASUS XP55T2P4 v3.1 motherboard. On th

Re: Abit TX5 Motherboard success?

1998-04-06 Thread Scott Kindley
Vicki Stanfield wrote: > I added the mem=128M line to lilo.conf (already had the > Adaptec stuff in there), and I haven't been able to boot since. -- You may wanna add append="mem=128M" to lilo.conf, the syntax you have is incorrect. This may be the problem but I can't say for sure since I don'

Abit TX5 Motherboard success?

1998-04-06 Thread Vicki Stanfield
Hi all. I bought an Abit TX5 motherboard this weekend with 2 64MB DIMMS. It appeared to work at first, but there were IRQ conflicts and it didn't see all the memory. I got rid of the IRQ conflicts that were reported by the BIOS and was able to boot the original kernel off of the Redhat 5.0 fro