PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Abiword 2.0.aaarghghghhghgh
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Ian Mortimer wrote:
>
> > Let's see: I see a report on slashdot that abiword 2.0 was released.
> > I went
> > where that pointed, and it had the SuSE, the gnome, and the gtk
versions of
> >
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Ian Mortimer wrote:
>
> > Let's see: I see a report on slashdot that abiword 2.0 was released. I went
> > where that pointed, and it had the SuSE, the gnome, and the gtk versions of
> > the release. I *presume* that they all use and need the same libraries, yet
> > each on
> Let's see: I see a report on slashdot that abiword 2.0 was released. I went
> where that pointed, and it had the SuSE, the gnome, and the gtk versions of
> the release. I *presume* that they all use and need the same libraries, yet
> each one finds *different* libraries missing, and most of t
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, mark wrote:
>
> Let's see: I see a report on slashdot that abiword 2.0 was released. I went
> where that pointed, and it had the SuSE, the gnome, and the gtk versions of
> the release. I *presume* that they all use and need the same libraries, yet
> each one finds *different* l
On Friday 19 September 2003 04:04 pm,
> From: Sean Estabrooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:26:15 -0400
> mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 19 September 2003 02:06 pm,
> > > From: Michael Lee Yohe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Why are you using a SuSE package? Instead
> I *do* wish folks would read what others wrote.
I did read your entire post - but you've sent your message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], not [EMAIL PROTECTED] I asked if you had
tried the Rawhide package - which is the bleeding edge packages from Red
Hat, not SuSE.
Red Hat packages are designed for Re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> From: "Stewart M. Ives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:45:51 -0400
>>
>> How about openoffice instead?? www.openoffice.org
>>
>> Try it.
>
> I don't suppose you read my entire post.
No Mark, I generally don't read the dribble people put after their na
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:26:15 -0400
mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 19 September 2003 02:06 pm,
> > From: Michael Lee Yohe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Why are you using a SuSE package? Instead, simply download
> > Abiword-2.0
> > from Rawhide.
>
> I *do* wish folks would read what ot
On Friday 19 September 2003 02:06 pm,
> From: Michael Lee Yohe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Why are you using a SuSE package? Instead, simply download Abiword-2.0
> from Rawhide.
I *do* wish folks would read what others wrote.
If you noticed, I *also* tried the abiword-gtk* package, and the
abiword
> From: "Stewart M. Ives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:45:51 -0400
>
> How about openoffice instead?? www.openoffice.org
>
> Try it.
I don't suppose you read my entire post.
I use it. I also congenially *loathe* it, since it was written by and for
people who buy the latest, g
How about openoffice instead?? www.openoffice.org
Try it.
stew
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Lee Yohe
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Abiword 2.0.aaarghghghhghgh
Why are you
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, mark wrote:
> Well, I've been *trying* to install AbiWord 2.0.
>
> Emphasis on the "trying". It is *very* trying.
>
> I try the SuSE package, and get
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libcrypto.so.0.9.6 is needed by abiword-2.0.0-SuSE.ulb.2
> libnautilus.so.2 i
Why are you using a SuSE package? Instead, simply download Abiword-2.0
from Rawhide.
--
Michael Lee Yohe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command Software Engineering Directorate
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/
Well, I've been *trying* to install AbiWord 2.0.
Emphasis on the "trying". It is *very* trying.
I try the SuSE package, and get
error: Failed dependencies:
libcrypto.so.0.9.6 is needed by abiword-2.0.0-SuSE.ulb.2
libnautilus.so.2 is needed by abiword-2.0.0-SuSE.ulb.2
libss
14 matches
Mail list logo
