On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 04:03:56PM -0700, Samuel Flory wrote:
Windowmaker is not present in newer versions of RH.
Which is rather annoying, but not a problem as such.
Even in older
versions of RH it has not been maintained in RH for a long time. The
menus are 80% filled with programs
KDE seems to run better than Gnome w/RH9 (for me - YMMV). Nevertheless
both environments seem to have gone way over the top.
There MUST be alternatives that are less ponderous. I'm much more
interested in efficiency and speed than pretty displays, animations or
other visual effects that add
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 08:08, David Hart wrote:
KDE seems to run better than Gnome w/RH9 (for me - YMMV). Nevertheless
both environments seem to have gone way over the top.
There MUST be alternatives that are less ponderous. I'm much more
interested in efficiency and speed than pretty
David Hart wrote:
KDE seems to run better than Gnome w/RH9 (for me - YMMV). Nevertheless
both environments seem to have gone way over the top.
There MUST be alternatives that are less ponderous. I'm much more
interested in efficiency and speed than pretty displays, animations or
other visual
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:08:40PM -0400, David Hart wrote:
There MUST be alternatives that are less ponderous. I'm much more
interested in efficiency and speed than pretty displays, animations
or other visual effects that add nothing to usability.
You don't need either one. I run just plain
Hal Burgiss wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:08:40PM -0400, David Hart wrote:
There MUST be alternatives that are less ponderous. I'm much more
interested in efficiency and speed than pretty displays, animations
or other visual effects that add nothing to usability.
You don't need
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 04:03:56PM -0700, Samuel Flory wrote:
Windowmaker is not present in newer versions of RH. Even in older
versions of RH it has not been maintained in RH for a long time. The
menus are 80% filled with programs no longer in redhat.
Who needs menus? ;-) I rarely
On 21 Jul 2003 18:08:40 -0400
David Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
KDE seems to run better than Gnome w/RH9 (for me - YMMV). Nevertheless
both environments seem to have gone way over the top.
There MUST be alternatives that are less ponderous. I'm much more
interested in efficiency
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:08:40PM -0400, David Hart wrote:
Suggestions?
Fvwm.
http://www.fvwm.org/
Emmanuel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:08:40PM -0400, David Hart wrote:
Suggestions?
Fvwm.
http://www.fvwm.org/
Why not just tell him to do this:
cat .xinitrc
exec xterm
^c
--
Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam
On Monday 21 July 2003 08:51 pm, David Hart wrote:
Suggestions?
I tried a number. including fvwm, fvwm-themes, blackbox, metacity,
xfce...and the one I've now decided to stay with, IceWM.
Not too hard to install (though I had problems during an upgrade from RH 7.3
(updated) to 9.0, but
On Monday 21 July 2003 06:08 pm, David Hart wrote:
KDE seems to run better than Gnome w/RH9 (for me - YMMV). Nevertheless
both environments seem to have gone way over the top.
There MUST be alternatives that are less ponderous. I'm much more
interested in efficiency and speed than pretty
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 18:30, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On 21 Jul 2003 18:08:40 -0400
David Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
KDE seems to run better than Gnome w/RH9 (for me - YMMV). Nevertheless
both environments seem to have gone way over the top.
There MUST be alternatives
13 matches
Mail list logo
