On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:31:48PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
[...]
> Effectively, the following lists that were introduced together
> with the original Red Hat Linux Project website:
>
> rhl-list
> rhl-devel-list
> rhl-beta-list
> rhl-docs-list
Thanks for the clarification. Learn som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:59:26 +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
> > >
> > > Err - "redhat-list" is still on that page, too, and so are all others.
> >
> > Uhm, you didn't read my message, did you? Try again,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 02:10:56PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:15:05 +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
>
> > > > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
> > >
> > > Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been transferred
> > > to the fedora-* lists. Ef
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:11:41 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Now I see that I misread your post. The first three messages posted to this
> thread were concerned about redhat-list. Your comment about rhl-list, being
> correct, but somewhat out of context,
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:27:28 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:04:00 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
>
> > It is simple. All subscribers of the rhl-* lists have NOT been transfered to
> > the fedora-* lists. I subscribe to both r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:04:00 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> It is simple. All subscribers of the rhl-* lists have NOT been transfered to
> the fedora-* lists. I subscribe to both rhl-list and fedora-list and they are
> quite different.
No. rhl-list is
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:12:54 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:17:16 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:30:11 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:03:00 -0400, Vince Scimeca wrote:
> I subscribed to the fedora-list and I am getting different messages then
> on this list so they seem to be different.
Of course they are different.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:17:16 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:30:11 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
> >
> > Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been transfer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:15:05 +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
> >
> > Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been transferred
> > to the fedora-* lists. Effectively, the rhl-* lists have
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 22:03, Vince Scimeca wrote:
>
> I subscribed to the fedora-list and I am getting different messages then
> on this list so they seem to be different.
>
> Vince
>
>
Ditto.
Bret
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mail
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 21:17, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:40:27 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:30:11 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
> >
> > Y
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:40:27 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:30:11 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
>
> Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been transferre
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 04:40:27PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:30:11 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
>
> Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been transferred
> to the fedora-* lists. Effectively, the rh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:30:11 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been transferred
to the fedora-* lists. Effectively, the rhl-* lists have been renamed
to
Ed Wilts wrote:
> Red Hat has never supported upgrades from a production release to a
> beta nor from a beta to production. I believe that many people have
> made it work, but it's officially unsupported.
You know, that was a REALLY stupid question. I had a "DOH!" moment
after sending this one
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:30:11AM -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> I know most of what we've been discussing here as been tons of
> speculation, but I have a couple more questions that I'd like opinions
> (or facts if you got 'em) on. First, if I install Severn on my box,
> will I be able update to the
I know most of what we've been discussing here as been tons of
speculation, but I have a couple more questions that I'd like opinions
(or facts if you got 'em) on. First, if I install Severn on my box,
will I be able update to the full version when it's released via
up2date? Or will I have to bur
18 matches
Mail list logo
