On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 11:33, Mark Haney wrote:
The FP scheme was changed to DSO on Apache 2 which means that HTTPD does
NOT get hacked in the process. Installation was a hell of a lot easier
and faster. Even the docs are very un-Linux like (steps 1 through 5
instead of a collection of links to var
I've successfully run the FP extensions on 2.0. I don't recall any
specific issues with them other than security. I deliberately moved from
IIS to Apache to avoid FP in my job here. I was here 2 months and the
IIS server was hacked through the FP extensions.
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 11:27, Alex w
Does such a thing even exist? If so, then where?
I only saw on the net support for apache 1.x, but nothing about versions
above apache 2
Thanks!
Alex
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 11:48, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
> > Check the folling links. First are the servers that FP will run on.
> > The latter is a step by step for setting up on linux with apache
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B302393
> >
> > http://support
> Will Quanta work with gnome? I thought it was for KDE.
Simply install the kdelibs and you can start the programm using the gnome
desktop. :)
Greetz,
A. Sopicki
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 05:35, Willem van der Walt wrote:
> Looking at a later message in this thread, refering to web editors,
> you can also look at HPbuilder from IBM i think.
> It has a customized wine package under which it run.
> It is wysiwyg. It generates valid but inifficient code.
>
> reg
Looking at a later message in this thread, refering to web editors,
you can also look at HPbuilder from IBM i think.
It has a customized wine package under which it run.
It is wysiwyg. It generates valid but inifficient code.
regards, Willem
On 20 Jun 2003, David Hart wrote:
> Has anyone succe
> I suppose that depends on how you feel about people who can't
> do HTML in vim. But, for the vim-challenged, there's Bluefish
> and Quanta Plus. Both are good, although Quanta's perhaps a
> bit more mature.
Will Quanta work with gnome? I thought it was for KDE.
--
redhat-list mailing li
On 20 Jun 2003, David Hart wrote:
> a Macromedia product. Linux needs a robust WYSIWYG web development tool.
I suppose that depends on how you feel about people who can't do HTML in
vim. But, for the vim-challenged, there's Bluefish and Quanta Plus. Both
are good, although Quanta's perhaps a bit
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 11:48, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
> Check the folling links. First are the servers that FP will run on.
> The latter is a step by step for setting up on linux with apache
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B302393
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/
Check the folling links. First are the servers that FP will run on.
The latter is a step by step for setting up on linux with apache
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B302393
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B202198
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 11:02
Has anyone successfully accomplished this task? I know that FP 2002 is
virtually impossible but FP 2000 is supposed to be doable. Can someone
ABC the steps for me?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Anyone had luck installing Frontpage extensions on RD 8.0 and Apache 2.0?
Any help would be appreciated.
Jay
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 3 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail&xAPID=4
I have been fighting with the frontpage extensinons
for several days now, and can't seem to get them to work. Specifically,
when I run the change_server.sh script, it trashes my httpd and I have to
replace httpd with a backup copy in order to restart the server. Am I
missing something here
Can someone give me instructions on how to get FrontPage extensions working
with Apache 1.3.19 (Wolverine)? I've downloaded the fp_install.sh script
and the fp40.linux.tar.Z file. I ran the script and everything appeared to
install fine. I then ran the fpsrvadmin.exe program and installe
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Frontpage Extensions
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:00:29 +1100
>
>Hi,
>
>I have been trying to install frontpage extensions onto a server running
>apache 1.3.17, and I get to the make stage, and get the following messages;
>http_request.c
Hi,
I have been trying to install frontpage extensions onto a server running
apache 1.3.17, and I get to the make stage, and get the following messages;
http_request.c: In function 'get_path_info':
http_request.c:191: structure has no member named 'execfilename'
http_request.
I haven't received it since 12-6.
Check your mailer...do you have it set to delete messages from the
server when you download them?
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 02:40:11 -0500, jack wallen wrote:
>why is this message coming into the list about a thousand times a day?
>
>On 2000.12.06 15:15:23 -0500 Br
why is this message coming into the list about a thousand times a day?
On 2000.12.06 15:15:23 -0500 Brian Wright wrote:
:First of all, I was able to get the FrontPage Server Extensions
:installed
:successfully on RH7. This is the M$ extensions, not the cloned
:version. I
:notic
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Wright
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FrontPage extensions on RH7 again - authentication woes.
First of all, I was able to get the FrontPage Server Exten
First of all, I was able to get the FrontPage Server Extensions installed
successfully on RH7. This is the M$ extensions, not the cloned version. I
noticed that the extensions will dump the ScriptAlias for the root web into
the SSL section of httpd.conf. You have to move it out to the main
Scri
ed in
quotes in the httpd.conf so I removed them and the install went perfectly.
Frank
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Reichenbacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Red Hat List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 9:57 AM
Subject: Zotz the
oops, that should have included rpm -e apache before deleting all the
files.
rpm -ql apache > file.lst
rpm -e apache
# then, if necessary
perl -ni -e 'print "rm -f $_"' file.lst
sh file.lst
hope you have this taken care of already.
charles
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
> You shoul
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Frank Reichenbacher wrote:
> rpm -e doesn't work, says that the package is not installed. rpm -i doesn't
> work, says the package is already installed. rpm -q doesn't work, says the
> package is not installed. rpm -v brings back error messages (I'm not at the
> machine so I c
henbacher
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Galpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Zotz the Frontpage Extensions
> You should not have to reinstall linux.
>
> I setup FP once. If I reca
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
> You should not have to reinstall linux.
>
> I setup FP once. If I recall correctly it was just a shell script that
> installed it. You should be able to easily deinstall all files by
> following the script.
>
> Same for the Apache rpm. If you don't t
You should not have to reinstall linux.
I setup FP once. If I recall correctly it was just a shell script that
installed it. You should be able to easily deinstall all files by
following the script.
Same for the Apache rpm. If you don't trust the rpm -e, first do a rpm -ql
and dump th eoutput t
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Frank Reichenbacher wrote:
> Dear Listers,
>
> Being a newbie I probably shouldn't have tried to install the FP extension
> without more closely studying the install package, but I did, and there it
> is, a smoking mess. The FP install script overwrote the original Apache
> h
Dear Listers,
Being a newbie I probably shouldn't have tried to install the FP extension
without more closely studying the install package, but I did, and there it
is, a smoking mess. The FP install script overwrote the original Apache
httpd daemon (the vers. that comes on the RH 6.2 cd) and has
You have a version mismatch between your devel libs and the apache I
assume. The module interfaces don't match. Make sure you are using the
same version across the board when you recompile.
hth
charles
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Kevin Hemenway wrote:
>
> "API module structure `vhost_alias_module' in
> I did this the other day, but didn't patch apache. I don't know what the
> raven ssl server is either. Not really sure if I can help, but thought I'd
> at least ask
The Raven is simply another module which adds SSL support to the server. It
duplicates (at least, the idea) of SSLeay and some of
ith frontpage server extensions 2000
> with suexec, php, and the raven ssl server. Someone on another list posted
> their little HOWTO on exactly how to do this, so I figured, hey, what the
> hell.
>
> Anyways, everything went along fine until I started the frontpage extensions
aven ssl server. Someone on another list posted
their little HOWTO on exactly how to do this, so I figured, hey, what the
hell.
Anyways, everything went along fine until I started the frontpage extensions
install. The last thing I saw of the install program was that it had
successfully binded to por
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you Wolfgang. This made my virtual hosts work
with FP extensions.
First thing that has worked first time with FP ext.
>you can put several IP Numbers to one physical Ethernet Card.
>
>For Example:
> if your first Adress is 192.168.0.1
>
>1.st alias ifconfig e
Hi Rita,
you can put several IP Numbers to one physical Ethernet Card.
For Example:
if your first Adress is 192.168.0.1
1.st alias ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.2
2.nd alias ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.0.3
and so on.
That´s all :-)
bye,
Wolfgang
--
---
I am having difficulty getting MS Frontpage Extensions to work with Apache
Virtual hosts. There is a mention in httpd.conf that server machine must
accept IP packets for multiple addresses and this is accomplished with the
ifconfig alias flag or through kernel patches like VIF. Does anyone know
36 matches
Mail list logo
