Re: Funny problem with wu-ftpd on RH 5.1

1998-06-27 Thread Michael K. Neylon
Regarding the Wu-FTPD problem with sendmail, the author of the wu-ftpd admitted that he accidently had that 'feature' set up in beta-16. He recently released an update , beta-17 that fixes this (was announced to one of the redhat announced groups. -- Michael K. Neylon, UM ChE Grad |

Re: Funny problem with wu-ftpd on RH 5.1

1998-06-27 Thread Nemeth Laszlo
GateKeepeR News wrote: hmm, this is odd. It may be sendmail is using a UID that is used by ftp. I also tought of it, but look at the part after "sendmail:". those are definitely coming from the ftpd, showing myself logged in anonymously with my e-mail add. as password, and doing nothing.

Re: Funny problem with wu-ftpd on RH 5.1

1998-06-26 Thread GateKeepeR News
hmm, this is odd. It may be sendmail is using a UID that is used by ftp. On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Nemeth Laszlo wrote: |Grant Bayley wrote: | | On thing was, when I checked in the process listing, ftp was showing up as | "sendmail", as follows: | | ftp295 0.0 1.1 1360 756 ? S

Re: Funny problem with wu-ftpd on RH 5.1

1998-06-24 Thread GateKeepeR News
Umm actually it looks more like sendmail is running as the user "ftp".. sendmail sets a default UID to run as, so if it is the same UID as ftp, well thats what would show up. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.. Bryan On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, William T Wilson wrote: |On Tue, 23 Jun 1998,

Funny problem with wu-ftpd on RH 5.1

1998-06-23 Thread Grant Bayley
Just installed all the various bits and pieces for RH 5.1 on two machines that were previously running 5.0. Very smooth upgrade... I rebooted, the boxes came up fine, and one of them, being a server started being used immediately. People started downloading from it using ftp, as they usually

Re: Funny problem with wu-ftpd on RH 5.1

1998-06-23 Thread William T Wilson
On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Grant Bayley wrote: On thing was, when I checked in the process listing, ftp was showing up as "sendmail", as follows: I can confirm this odd behavior. I can't imagine what would cause it. -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!