OK thanks again. Darn Decaf.
Quoting Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Coffee must not have kicked in when, on Thu, 3 Apr 2003, I wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I don't know where to find P4 binaries of 2.95.x. I also
> don't
> > know if 2.95.x will compile for the P4.
>
> Of course, i386 and i686
Coffee must not have kicked in when, on Thu, 3 Apr 2003, I wrote:
> Sorry, I don't know where to find P4 binaries of 2.95.x. I also don't
> know if 2.95.x will compile for the P4.
Of course, i386 and i686 binaries will run fine on a P4, though perhaps
marginally slower that if they were P4 optim
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:01PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> [...]
> > If you must have 2.95.3 (or any version of the compiler that doesn't come
> > as an RPM *designed to live peacefully with the stock comiler*), the best
> > strategy is to grab the
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> Matthew
>
> WOW! Thanks very much for instructions.
>
> Daniel
Just so we are clear, the instructions are due to John Matthews, not me.
They are pretty good, though.
>
> Quoting "Matthews, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>[nice instructions for building
nd I'll help you. I do
> this kind
> of thing a lot.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Sheltraw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: GCC and Redhat 8.0
>
>
> Hello
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:01PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
[...]
> If you must have 2.95.3 (or any version of the compiler that doesn't come
> as an RPM *designed to live peacefully with the stock comiler*), the best
> strategy is to grab the tarballs from gcc.gnu.org and install them in
> /
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 10:21, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> Cliff
>
>
> > > The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler and
> > > a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> > > with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTAI
> > > real-time executiv
a lot.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Sheltraw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GCC and Redhat 8.0
Hello Again
> > > > So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something
> else
> > &
Matthew
OK thnks for all of your help.
Daniel
Quoting Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
>
> > Matthew
> >
> > Would you happen to know where I could download binaries for a
> > Pentium 4 machine? I did not see the binaries for this ubiquitous
>
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> Matthew
>
> Would you happen to know where I could download binaries for a
> Pentium 4 machine? I did not see the binaries for this ubiquitous
> machine on the binaries page of the GNU GCC site. I have never
> compiled a compiler and do not know if GCC
Matthew
> > > The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler
> and
> > > a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> > > with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTAI
> > > real-time executive patch. The latest RTAI patch says in a
> README
> > > f
Cliff
> > The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler and
> > a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> > with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTAI
> > real-time executive patch. The latest RTAI patch says in a README
> > file that the
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 09:29, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
>
> >
> > The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler and
> > a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> > with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTA
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 09:29, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
>
> The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler and
> a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTAI
> real-time executive patch. The latest RTAI pa
Hello Again
> > > > So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something
> else
> > > > altogether ?
> > >
> > > Yes, kgcc.
> >
> > I doubt it. I don't even have kgcc installed, and no problem
> building
> > anything. I think kgcc was just a 7.x creature, back when early
> 2.96
> > compile
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:02:08AM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> >
> > > So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something else
> > > altogether ?
> >
> > Yes, kgcc.
>
> I doubt it. I don't even have k
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:02:08AM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Aly Dharshi wrote:
>
> > So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something else
> > altogether ?
>
> Yes, kgcc.
I doubt it. I don't even have kgcc installed, and no problem building
anything. I thin
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something else
> altogether ?
Yes, kgcc.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aly.
>
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 21:41, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Redhat list
> > >
So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something else
altogether ?
Cheers,
Aly.
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 21:41, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
>
> > Hello Redhat list
> >
> > I see that the RedHat 8.0 distribution has the GCC 3.2 compiler.
>
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> Hello Redhat list
>
> I see that the RedHat 8.0 distribution has the GCC 3.2 compiler.
> Does RedHat 8.0 have a compiler fit for kernel work in particular
> 2.95.x?
What kernel? AFAIK, Red Hat compiles their 8.0 kernels with the included
gcc 3.2. I'm
Hello Redhat list
I see that the RedHat 8.0 distribution has the GCC 3.2 compiler.
Does RedHat 8.0 have a compiler fit for kernel work in particular
2.95.x?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
21 matches
Mail list logo
