Ulrich Czekalla wrote:
Your both somewhat right. The general definition of an OS is a system that
controls and coordinates the use of hardware among the various application
programs for the various users. ...
Apologies for diving into this thread late. However, I think something that
I was
That's _exactly_ what we're discussing here. I'm saying your
definition has absolutely no basis in reality. Please quote me
someone who says that the OS equals the kernel and nothing more.
Remember: "system"=="many programs".
Your both somewhat right. The general definition of an OS
Agreed. I'll shut up now.
sorry for the bandwidth use.
Ulrich Czekalla wrote:
Your both somewhat right. The general definition of an OS is a system that
controls and coordinates the use of hardware among the various application
programs for the various users. So it acts as a resource
I hope that was the last message thread, this has gotten so out of hand I
am ready to have my mail server dump them before they get to me.
Just remember we all choose this wonderful life of computer engineering
and have to deal and be able to accept that there are no BLACK/WHITE
answers. All ya
Jeffrey Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 02:53:50PM -0400:
I hope that was the last message thread, this has gotten so out of hand I
am ready to have my mail server dump them before they get to me.
Just remember we all choose this wonderful life of computer engineering
and