Re: OT: MailScanner question

2003-09-22 Thread Bret Hughes
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 18:21, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > > As an aside: > > I just updated my mailscanner and SA and spent about an hour training > > the bayes engine with about 2000 each spam and ham. I was still getting > > about 10% spam making it through before( actually increased to about 15%

Re: OT: MailScanner question

2003-09-22 Thread Gerry Doris
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > > As an aside: > > I just updated my mailscanner and SA and spent about an hour training > > the bayes engine with about 2000 each spam and ham. I was still getting > > about 10% spam making it through before( actually increased to about 15% > > lat

Re: OT: MailScanner question

2003-09-22 Thread Gerry Doris
On 22 Sep 2003, Bret Hughes wrote: > As an aside: > I just updated my mailscanner and SA and spent about an hour training > the bayes engine with about 2000 each spam and ham. I was still getting > about 10% spam making it through before( actually increased to about 15% > lately with the orisoft

Re: OT: MailScanner question

2003-09-22 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
> As an aside: > I just updated my mailscanner and SA and spent about an hour training > the bayes engine with about 2000 each spam and ham. I was still getting > about 10% spam making it through before( actually increased to about 15% > lately with the orisoft going down and I assume that the ver

Re: OT: MailScanner question

2003-09-22 Thread Bret Hughes
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 19:59, Michael Mansour wrote: > --- "Benjamin J. Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay, I know that this is Off Topic, but if the > > answer is easy, I'd rather > > not have to join another list. If it's involved and > > there's not an > > easy-recipe web site (I have

Re: OT: MailScanner question

2003-09-22 Thread Bret Hughes
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 19:59, Michael Mansour wrote: > --- "Benjamin J. Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay, I know that this is Off Topic, but if the > > answer is easy, I'd rather > > not have to join another list. If it's involved and > > there's not an > > easy-recipe web site (I have

Re: OT: MailScanner question

2003-09-21 Thread Michael Mansour
--- "Benjamin J. Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, I know that this is Off Topic, but if the > answer is easy, I'd rather > not have to join another list. If it's involved and > there's not an > easy-recipe web site (I haven't found one after > quite a bit of search) > then I'll go joi

OT: MailScanner question

2003-09-21 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
Okay, I know that this is Off Topic, but if the answer is easy, I'd rather not have to join another list. If it's involved and there's not an easy-recipe web site (I haven't found one after quite a bit of search) then I'll go join the mailscanner list. I've dedicated this weekend to making my