Re: Pop-Before-SMTP

n pop authentication. Even my ISP > (Verizon) uses pop-first to authenticate SMTP. > I relay mail through outgoing.verizon.net using smtp-auth, and I wasn't aware they were still using pop before smtp on any of their mailservers. Smtp-auth ought to just work for all recent versions of sendma

Re: Pop-Before-SMTP

I've used it with RH7.x. Should work the same way with RH9. In the "my_networks" area, add "btree:/etc/mail/dracd" (dracd usually keeps the dracd.db in the /etc/mail directory, and it's a btree database). The question is, have you modified your POP3 or IMAP daemon to work with DRAC? If not, I

Re: Pop-Before-SMTP

On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 11:28, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > On 01-Jun-2003/11:06 -0400, dch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Has anyone gotten this or DRAC to work with RH9 and Postfix? I need to > >authenticate roaming users. > > Have you considered SMTP Auth? > > http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patr

Re: Pop-Before-SMTP

On 01-Jun-2003/11:06 -0400, dch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Has anyone gotten this or DRAC to work with RH9 and Postfix? I need to >authenticate roaming users. Have you considered SMTP Auth? http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/ Tony -- Anthony E. Greene

Pop-Before-SMTP

Has anyone gotten this or DRAC to work with RH9 and Postfix? I need to authenticate roaming users. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: POP before SMTP

my 2 cents. smtp auth is cool, however, users are stupid and can't set it up. My clients can't even find this in their outlook, netscape that i had to go back to pop before smtp. On Sun, 19 May 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash:

Re: POP before SMTP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19-May-2002/19:07 -0400, Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Brother Paiz, I'm afraid you misread or misunderstood my comment. > >Not all mailers understand or can make use of SMTP AUTH. I did not say >"not all MTAs"...mailers = client mail p

Re: POP before SMTP

Sorry...he specifically noted Sendmail, and it was obvious, at least to me, that he was referring to servers. On 19 May 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Yeah, that's what he said. All of the common mailers (and I mean both > clients and servers) understand SMTP AUTH. POP before SMT

Re: POP before SMTP

Warning Unable to process data: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_ascension.dragonsdawn.net-2986-1021851151-0001-2"

Re: POP before SMTP

10:10 PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote: > >On Thu, 16 May 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > > > > > > Because POP before SMTP is a kludge. SMTP AUTH is part of the standard. > > > > > > >But Pop-Before-SMTP utilizes existing, easily implementable standards. &

Re: POP before SMTP

At 5/16/2002 10:10 PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote: >On Thu, 16 May 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > > > > Because POP before SMTP is a kludge. SMTP AUTH is part of the standard. > > > >But Pop-Before-SMTP utilizes existing, easily implementable standards. > >Not a

Re: POP before SMTP

But Pop-Before-SMTP utilizes existing, easily implementable standards. Not all mailers understand or can make use of SMTP AUTH, and it's not necessarily an easy thing to properly implement. On Thu, 16 May 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: S

Re: POP before SMTP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16-May-2002/20:59 -0400, Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [about POP-before-SMTP vs SMTP AUTH] >not to be argumentative, but why is one necessarily more preferable than >the other? Because POP before SMTP is a kludge. SMTP AUT

Re: POP before SMTP

not to be argumentative, but why is one necessarily more preferable than the other? On Thu, 16 May 2002, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > At 5/16/2002 08:10 AM -0400, you wrote: > >Soes anyone know how to implement this using standard Redhat RPMs? I have a > >few problems with spammers getting through

Re: POP before SMTP

Words by Chris Mason [Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:10:20AM -0400]: > Soes anyone know how to implement this using standard Redhat RPMs? I have a > few problems with spammers getting through and using my web server as a spam > relay. > So you confess yourself guilty of "bad sysadmin practice"? Why sh

Re: POP before SMTP

At 5/16/2002 08:10 AM -0400, you wrote: >Soes anyone know how to implement this using standard Redhat RPMs? I have a >few problems with spammers getting through and using my web server as a spam >relay. Preferably, don't. Use SMTP AUTH instead; check the archives for how to do so. All you need t

POP before SMTP

Soes anyone know how to implement this using standard Redhat RPMs? I have a few problems with spammers getting through and using my web server as a spam relay. Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] Box 340, The Valley, Anguilla, British West Indies Tel: 264 497 5670 Fax: 264 497 8463 Take a virtual tour

POP-before-SMTP w/ sendmail on RH 7.2

Does anyone know of an implementation of POP-before-SMTP that works in conjunction with sendmail on RH 7.2? I've tried stock versions of drac, poprelayd, and a few others, but none seemed to play nicely with RH's sendmail.cf. -- Drew Bertola | Send a text message to my pag

Re: [RH] POP before SMTP

On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 06:47:20PM -0800, Steve Lee wrote: > Sorry for this question. I really need a POP to SMTP authentication > for my pop server. I have been using the drac version of sendmail > and everything was perfect until now. I just realized that > all works perfect until i need to r

Re: POP before SMTP

"btree"? Am I correct in my understanding, then, that you're running "makemap btree virtusertable < virtusertable"? The default for virtusertable, etc, is "hash". Try "makemap hash virtusertable < virtusertable", and see if that works. On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Steve Lee wrote: > Okay. the upgra

Re: POP before SMTP

Okay. the upgrade has really broken my mail server. Luckily i can still use it but make no modification. I was able to Drac to work by reinstalling the version of sendmail-8.11.0-8.i386.rpm. When i remake the btree for all the generic and virtual user table, it still doesn't work. I thnk i need

Re: POP before SMTP

At 11/23/2001 06:47 PM -0800, you wrote: >Sorry for this question. I really need a POP to SMTP authentication >for my pop server. I have been using the drac version of sendmail >and everything was perfect until now. I just realized that >all works perfect until i need to rebuild the virt user ta

Re: POP before SMTP

At 11/24/2001 12:16 AM -0500, you wrote: >I've replaced Sendmail with Postfix...and have been using Postfix with >DRAC for quite a while now...no problems. Which doesn't really answer his question... at least not until you give him a great deal more detail. It's nice that your system works, but

POP before SMTP

Sorry for this question. I really need a POP to SMTP authentication for my pop server. I have been using the drac version of sendmail and everything was perfect until now. I just realized that all works perfect until i need to rebuild the virt user table and everything breaks. So, i can't no

Re: POP before SMTP

Let me try to explain. I have been able to upgrade from since RedHat 6.2->7.0->7.1 and have mail work without a problem. Since my upgrade to RedHat 7.2, i have discovered that i can no longer modify the Generics table, access, Virtual User table, or any thing. However, the mail server still