At 7/15/2003 14:02 +0100, you wrote:
I am aware of the .forward file forwarding mail from one user to another, is
there any way to set up a file to cause sendmail to copy another user with
the emails?
I believe this will forward to another user:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
while this will COPY to another
gregory mott wrote:
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 17:59, Larry Brown wrote:
I am aware of the .forward file forwarding mail from one user to another, is
there any way to set up a file to cause sendmail to copy another user with
the emails?
/etc/aliases or /etc/mail/aliases
or put two lines in
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 17:59, Larry Brown wrote:
I am aware of the .forward file forwarding mail from one user to another, is
there any way to set up a file to cause sendmail to copy another user with
the emails?
/etc/aliases or /etc/mail/aliases
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe
,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Leonard Miller
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: forward roots mail
Is mutt installed? If so, type mutt and see if it is there. You have
to edit your /etc
The 'linux gnomes' are at lurking:)
-Original Message-
From: Nick White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: forward roots mail
Mutt wasn't installed. I came in this morning, and I had 41 messages
Yeah, linux sometimes seems to have an amazing ability to fix itself
overnight.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rick Carroll
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: forward roots mail
The 'linux
Mutt wasn't installed. I came in this morning, and I had 41 messages
from root! I was working on the DNS config for that box yesterday, so
it must have been a DNS issue.
I left the root:marc commented out in /etc/aliases, and the
/root/.forward seems to work now.
/etc/aliases is the one
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rick Johnson
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: forward roots mail
Mutt wasn't installed. I came in this morning, and I had 41 messages
from root! I was working on the DNS config for that box yesterday, so
Is mutt installed? If so, type mutt and see if it is there.
You have to edit your /etc/aliases file for the mail to get
forwarded to an external account.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/26/03 12:36PM
We just reloaded one of our 7.2 boxes with RedHat 8.0. On 7.2, I had
a
file /root/.forward with my
- Original Message -
From: Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:18
Subject: Re: Forward IP from eth0:1 to real host behind eth1
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Nick Lindsell wrote:
At 14:16 15/01/2003 +, you wrote:
Hi Folks
, January 15, 2003 10:18
Subject: Re: Forward IP from eth0:1 to real host behind eth1
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Nick Lindsell wrote:
At 14:16 15/01/2003 +, you wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have a Watchguard firebox II which is based on a 2.2 kernel. With
this
box
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 01:39, Gary Stainburn wrote:
Could someone please provide me with the two commands I'd need to run
(presumably the second would look something like:
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -d 10.1.0.34:80 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.2
On Linux 2.4, you'd do this:
LOCAL_IP=10.1.0.34
At 14:16 15/01/2003 +, you wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have a Watchguard firebox II which is based on a 2.2 kernel. With this
box,
I can define IP addresses within the subnet of the public I/F and have that
traffic forwarded to a host within my DMZ.
For example the public I/F of the firewall is
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Nick Lindsell wrote:
At 14:16 15/01/2003 +, you wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have a Watchguard firebox II which is based on a 2.2 kernel. With this
box,
I can define IP addresses within the subnet of the public I/F and have that
traffic forwarded to a host within my DMZ.
Message -
From: Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:18
Subject: Re: Forward IP from eth0:1 to real host behind eth1
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Nick Lindsell wrote:
At 14:16 15/01/2003 +, you wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have a Watchguard
packets for PUBLICIP:PORT and forward to PRIVATEIP:PORT. Look at the -m
and -p switches for iptables
/B
- Original Message -
From: Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:18
Subject: Re: Forward IP from eth0:1 to real host behind eth1
Make sure that your mail server is configured to honor .forward.
I can tell you how to do so with Postfix, but if you're running anything
else, I'm not going to be able to be of much more help.
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Shyam Kumar Mankayil wrote:
I have a mail account [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for a
/etc/aliases might be a tad easier for this. just put exactly what you
put in your .forward file, into an alias instead. con: requires root.
Mike Burger wrote:
What you're doing wrong is that you're using the .forward file.
In this case, you really want to make use of procmail.
Greg Conway
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ashe
Sent: 05 April 2002 15:18
To: Greg Conway
Subject: Re: .forward?
Hello Greg,
Friday, April 05, 2002, 12:54:09 AM, you textually orated:
GC I am trying to achieve something I thought would be really
simple (I seem to
GC remember from my Unix days!) but I
What you're doing wrong is that you're using the .forward file.
In this case, you really want to make use of procmail.
man procmailex...near the top, it gives you an example of sending a copy
of one person's email to another, and keep a copy for the original
recipient.
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002,
Hello Greg,
Friday, April 05, 2002, 12:54:09 AM, you textually orated:
GC I am trying to achieve something I thought would be really simple (I seem to
GC remember from my Unix days!) but I just cannot seem to get it working...
GC what I want to achieve is for any emails that arrive for 'fred'
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 6/12/2001 at 10:36 AM Wayne Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gregausit/redhat-list] wrote:
Greetings, everyone.
I have a RH 6.2 box that functions as a fax server. Users never actually
log on to the machine, but the fax commands are issued from out main
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:46:46AM -0500, Bruce Kall wrote:
I understand that there is (some) backward compatibility
built into RH versions for cross-compilation to older
RH systems. What I'm more interested in is forward-
compatibility.
So far I have had no problem compiling an
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:56:41 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: .forward file not working
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have loaded up 7.0 and am now working on getting procmail filters
oeprational. However, I've run into a problem that has me
.forward, if I recall correctly, can not point to an executable. If
you want to use procmail, just use the .procmailrc file.
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:56:41 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have loaded up 7.0 and am now working on getting procmail filters
oeprational. However, I've run
what you have to do is specifically mention to sendmail you want to use
Procmail as your local delivery agent in sendmail.cf file.
something like:
Mlocal, P=/usr/bin/procmail, F=lsDFMAw5:/|@qSPfhn9,
S=EnvFromL/HdrFromL,R=EnvToL/HdrToL,
hi,
as far as i know and experienced, U can place
an entry in .forward file like
name@email
with this, a copy remains in U'r INBOX and one
copy will be sent to the mailid specified in
.forward file.
i did it in PINE and don't know what's U'rs.
At 12:28 AM 06-09-00, you wrote:
hi,
as far as i know and experienced, U can place
an entry in .forward file like
name@email
with this, a copy remains in U'r INBOX and one
copy will be sent to the mailid specified in
.forward file.
i did it in PINE and don't know what's
thanks to all that respond.
- dondave -
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
29 matches
Mail list logo
