ahmen brother.
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Thornton Prime wrote:
On the stability issue, I have heard a lot of people complain about 7.0,
but after installing or upgrading almost 100 machines now to 7.0, (with
over 75% being in a live, production environment), I can't say I've had any of
the
"Michael Burger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fine if A) "ipop3" actually installed with RH7
That depends on your configuration.
Most pop3 daemons run as a daemon, now...I point you at qpopper,
cucipop, gnu-pop3d, and a great many others.
None of these are included, so saying this:
In
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, you wrote:
I can't get POP3 to start and I have installed a few times. What am I
missing.
Inetd.conf has been replaced with xinetd.conf.
John
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John
I found that file but there is not much in there and I went the
xinetd.d dir and there is nothing in there about POP3D. Sorry for the
stupid questions...
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
On
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, you wrote:
John
I found that file but there is not much in there and I went the
xinetd.d dir and there is nothing in there about POP3D. Sorry for the
stupid questions...
No such thing as a "stupid question." :-) I just wish I could help. I'm not
running RH 7. I'm
I hope that this is not a bug... Is anyone running 7.0 as a pop3 server ?
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, you wrote:
John
I found that file but there is not much in there and
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, you wrote:
I can't get POP3 to start and I have installed a few times. What am I
missing.
Inetd.conf has been replaced with xinetd.conf.
John
Plus, instead of entries in inetd.conf (now xinetd.conf) for each service,
In 7.0, pop3d doesn't really run out of inetd/xinetd. Normally, it runs
as a constantly running daemon, now.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
John
I found that file but there is not much in there and I went the
xinetd.d dir and there is nothing in there about POP3D. Sorry
Jerry I have found that but nothing in that dir says anything about pop3
should I move the pop3d over to that dir?
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Jerry Winegarden wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
On Tue,
Mike
When I try and telnet to that machine using port 110 it gives me
connection refused. That would tell me that there is a problem with POP3
running.
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
In 7.0,
I would agree...tha twould tell me that, if it's supposed to be started by
xinetd, that it isn't, or that there's no POP3 daemon running.
First...do a ps -ax | grep pop to see if there's anything running.
Next...check your /etc/rc.d/init.d for any startup script for a pop3
daemon (my favorite is
Mike nothing there also I did a find . -name *pop* and it did not find the
ipop3 daemon. How the heck can I install just POP3 ?
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
I would agree...tha twould tell me that, if
Go to rpmfind.net, and do a search for pop3.
Grab the POP3 RPM that's labelled for RH7, download it, and install it.
I also recommend the cucipop RPM at www.jasons.org/mailstuff
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
Mike nothing there also I did a find . -name *pop* and it did not find
Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In 7.0, pop3d doesn't really run out of inetd/xinetd. Normally, it runs
as a constantly running daemon, now.
This is false.
[teg@halden teg]$ cat /etc/xinetd.d/ipop3
# default: off
# description: The POP3 service allows remote users to access their
Mike
So what you are telling me is that V7.0 does not come with a POP3
server?
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
Go to rpmfind.net, and do a search for pop3.
Grab the POP3 RPM that's labelled for
Scott Skrogstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what you are telling me is that V7.0 does not come with a POP3
server?
Red Hat Linux 7 comes with a pop server - it's part of the imap rpm.
After installing this, make sure to run up2date to download the errata.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrd
I have got it installed and it now shows up in my xined.d dir but I still
am getting connection refused. I have rebooted the server and still not
luck.
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
On 16 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
Scott Skrogstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have got it installed and it now shows up in my xined.d dir but I still
am getting connection refused. I have rebooted the server and still not
luck.
You need to turn it on ("chkconfig ipop3 on") and do a xinetd reload
("service xinetd reload")
Thank you very much it works great now. Can you recomend a good book to
bring me up to speed with all the changes in v7?
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
On 16 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
Scott Skrogstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What pop3 daemon did you install? IIRC if it runs from xinetd.d you can
copy one of the startup files in xinetd.d, say like telnetcp telnet
pop3 then edit the new file to reflect your pop daemon's path and
parameters and restart xinetd. something like this
service pop3
{
Fine if A) "ipop3" actually installed with RH7 and B) most people
actually ran it.
Most pop3 daemons run as a daemon, now...I point you at qpopper,
cucipop, gnu-pop3d, and a great many others.
On 16 Jan 2001 17:38:00 -0500, Trond Eivind Glomsr d wrote:
Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No...just that it appears that one is not installed by default.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:52:43 -0600 (CST), Scott Skrogstad wrote:
Mike
So what you are telling me is that V7.0 does not come with a POP3
server?
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475
At this point, you need to go into your pop3 file in /etc/xinetd.d
and change the "disabled" line from yes to no.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:26:31 -0600 (CST), Scott Skrogstad wrote:
I have got it installed and it now shows up in my xined.d dir but I still
am getting connection refused. I have
Boot up in rescue mode and edit the following file /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit
remark the lines listed below:
# Load agpgart here. This is a hack, and will probably go away soon.
if grep "driver: agpgart" /etc/sysconfig/hwconf /dev/null 21 ; then
modprobe agpgart /dev/null 21
fi
save the
I prefer
chkconfig --level 0123456 kudzu off
man chkconfig or chkconfig --help for details.
hth
charles
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Mike Burger wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Hakan Kuecuekyilmaz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi all,
Redhat 7.0 install went just like a dream.
Hello,
just disable Kudzu (Sysvinit). Because I don't know your Desktop it isn't easy
to recommend a workaround, as far as I can remember there is a tool ( maybe
sysvinit with all those nice scripts and runlevels) with KDE where you can
disable Kudzu.
Hope this helps
Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from a command prompt..
chkconfig --del kudzu
man chkconfig for more details.
-adam
Hello,
just disable Kudzu (Sysvinit). Because I don't know your Desktop it isn't easy
to recommend a workaround, as far as I can remember there is a tool ( maybe
sysvinit with all those nice scripts and
Hello Mettavihari,
I would now like to disable "hardware detect" at the time of reboot.
Run "setup" as root, and go the section "System services". You can also run
"ntsysv" directly. Disable the service "kudzu" here.
Bye,
If you run setup as root isn't there an option to disable kudzu there?
Adam Goucher [EMAIL PROTECTED]@redhat.com on 12/11/2000 11:29:35 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: 7.0 disable hardware detect after install
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi all,
Redhat 7.0 install went just like a dream.
I would now like to disable "hardware detect" at the time of reboot.
hello,
a simple way is to type "setup" as root and to run System Services,
there u can
turn off kudzu and many other serives and
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Hakan Kuecuekyilmaz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi all,
Redhat 7.0 install went just like a dream.
I would now like to disable "hardware detect" at the time of reboot.
hello,
a simple way is to type "setup" as root and to run System Services,
On Tue, 05 Dec 2000, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
Hi,
on a regular basis, I try to upgrade RH and I almost always have to go back
to the list.
Here again, I have a pretty interesting pbs :
2 times I tried to re-compile the kernel after intalling the sources.
Fist pb : installing the
I ran into this problem yesterday. If your .config file is worth saving, rename
it and then do a "make mrproper", which will erase all relics of past compiles
from the source tree as well as any user-entered configuration information. Then
do a "make [x|menu]config" and re-load your .config
as always been somehow a big
pain as soon as you have any custom stuff going on
Philippe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael R. Jinks
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7.0 "upgrade" p
h (I did
an update)
would be very very welcome.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael R. Jinks
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7.0 "upgrade" pbs ...
I ran into this problem ye
Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
I respond to myself as it seems that it is a well known pb with RH 7.0 .
the shipped version is bugged !
What makes you say this? Be specific. I've had no trouble using RH7, and I've
now compiled the kernel several times, so I'm inclined to suspect that
er 05, 2000 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7.0 "upgrade" pbs ... more and WARNING
Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
I respond to myself as it seems that it is a well known pb with RH 7.0 .
the shipped version is bugged !
What makes you say this? Be specific. I've had no
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
Michael,
There are TONS of messages on the net (some from Alan Cox which seems to
know what he is talking about) about the fact that the gcc 2.96 is NOT a
release, that it produces broken kernel. It is easy to find on the net :
search for
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 06:02:57PM -0800, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
Michael,
There are TONS of messages on the net (some from Alan Cox which seems to
know what he is talking about) about the fact that the gcc 2.96 is NOT a
release, that it produces broken kernel. It is easy to find on the
AIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael R. Jinks
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7.0 "upgrade" pbs ... more and WARNING
Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
I respond to myself as it seems that it is a well known pb with
...
Philippe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael R. Jinks
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7.0 "upgrade" pbs ... more
Yuck. Well, what about trying to install the kernel from a tarba
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Philippe Moutarlier
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 7.0 "upgrade" pbs ... more
Well,
I don't know how you could compile this code at all. I went to f
-Original Message-
From: Leonard den Ottolander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, November 20, 2000 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: 7.0 nfs install problem
Hi Jeff,
As I understand it, you need to have the contents of both cd's in a
directory together
I believe the README on the CD contains the instructions.
Jamin W. Collins
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Hogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7.0 nfs install problem
-Original Message-
From: Leonard den
-Original Message-
From: Charles Galpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, November 20, 2000 2:54 PM
Subject: 7.0 nfs install problem
I'm quite sure I'm doing this correctly, and have tried several
permutations of different values, but it isn't
Hi Jeff,
As I understand it, you need to have the contents of both cd's in a
directory together to do an nfs install.
The CD installation I did only required one CD, so why would the NFS install
require the contents of both CD's to be available?
Assuming you need the 2
Hi Charles,
/mnt/cdrom(ro,insecure,all_squash)
Have you used the all_squash option for this kind of install before? Maybe
you should drop it. If I do an NFS install I usually share the CD without any
options (I have no security concerns here at home :) ).
Nov 20
Thanks Jeff!
That will teach me not to read the README. It explains this very clearly
:)
charles
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jeff Hogg wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Charles Galpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I'm a dumbass...
As I understand it, you need to have the contents of both cd's in
Do you have this line in /etc/hosts.allow?
ALL: 192.168.0.
I have two Red Hat 6.1 machines in my network. They're both nfs
servers. They both have this line in their /etc/hosts.allow. Their
local IP addresses are 192.168.0.x. Good luck,
Hidong
Charles Galpin wrote:
I'm
Not sure, but I just downloaded it and did a complete reinstall, looks like
the latest version to me, anyone else know, I sure wish they put info on
that stuff.
D.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eduardo M. A. M.
Mendes
Sent: Friday,
Anaconda Update disk:
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2000-084-04.html
I haven't checked that page, but I did see the announcement.
Could we have already-updated boot disks please, for those who burn their own
CDs.
I've already seen enough updates to warrant fiddling with the
Sure, I can whip some up... If you want to do it yourself:
mkdir boot
mount -o loop boot.img boot
zcat boot/initrd.img initrd.nogz
mkdir initrd
mount -o loop initrd.nogz initrd
mkdir updates
mount updates.img updates
mkdir initrd/tmp/updates
cp updates/* initrd/tmp/updates
umount initrd
gzip -9
Why was www and ftp moved to /var
not that this is good or bad, simply asking for peace of mind
Kind regards
Kevin
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:41:59PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why was www and ftp moved to /var
not that this is good or bad, simply asking for peace of mind
People wanted to automount /home, and with the docroots there it was
impossible. Secondly, according to the FHS standard
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:45:58 +0800
From: John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: 7.0 will not install
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:41:59PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 12:48:42PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
I presume that's the install-time "insert update disk" routine that
I'd rather avoid when I create my updated CDs.
Right, the "insert update disk" simply takes the files on the floppy
and loads them into /tmp/updates on the
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 12:48:42PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
I presume that's the install-time "insert update disk" routine that
I'd rather avoid when I create my updated CDs.
Right, the "insert update disk" simply takes the files on the floppy
and loads them into /tmp/updates on
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 10:02:59AM -0500, Alan Mead wrote:
At 08:58 PM 10/6/00 , you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:39:06AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morning all
I've just installed 7.0 on a spare Thinkpad, and find that I can not
run some applications that worked fine on
At 08:58 PM 10/6/00 , you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:39:06AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morning all
I've just installed 7.0 on a spare Thinkpad, and find that I can not
run some applications that worked fine on previous editions of RH.
Acrobat reader installs okay but will
I just installed ld.so-1.9.5-13 and libc-5.3.12-31 from RedHat 6.2 on a
RedHat 7.0 system and WP 8 seems to work fine. I suspect these are left
installed if you do an upgrade as opposed to a full install.
One interesting note: if you do a "ldd" on the the xwp executable before
installing these
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:39:06AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morning all
I've just installed 7.0 on a spare Thinkpad, and find that I can not run some
applications that worked fine on previous editions of RH.
Acrobat reader installs okay but will not run [I ge t the dreaded "no
On Fri, 06 Oct 2000 21:58:13 -0400, fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:39:06AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morning all
I've just installed 7.0 on a spare Thinkpad, and find that I can not run some
applications that worked fine on previous editions of RH.
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:40:14AM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:04:40PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote:
I just did the upgrade from 6.2 and so far so good. I mostly use
Windowmaker without gnome. But thought it worth taking a look at
X4+gnome. The upgrade stuck me with
I don't know if this applies because I have not installed WP with 7.0 yet, but Corel
posts this fix:
http://linux.corel.com/support/script.htm
Paul Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morning all
I've just installed 7.0 on a spare Thinkpad, and find that I can not run some
applications
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:04:40PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote:
I just did the upgrade from 6.2 and so far so good. I mostly use
Windowmaker without gnome. But thought it worth taking a look at
X4+gnome. The upgrade stuck me with 3.3.6, and I've gotten 4.01
going now. BUT -- I am stuck in 8bpp
sunsite.unc.edu
sunsite.utk.edu
metalab.unc.edu (which is the same as sunsite.unc.edu)
those have the full distros already. wisc.edu has it as well (check
the mirrors list at redhat).
By this time, though, most mirrors should be up-to-date with the
lists for Guinness.
Bill Ward
t Einstein
-Original Message-
From: Ward William E PHDN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 8:20 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: 7.0
sunsite.unc.edu
sunsite.utk.edu
metalab.unc.edu (which is the same as sunsite.unc.edu)
those have the full distros already. wi
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Chapman, Matt wrote:
the iso images... is disc1 still all we need to install it?
For an extremely basic install, you might get away with only disc1. The
installer doesn't tell you what requires disc2, so unless you want to do
some careful manual planning yourself, you
no, at a minimum you will need disk1 and disk2. A bit annoying too since
you can't leave it unattended anymore.
charles
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Chapman, Matt wrote:
the iso images... is disc1 still all we need to install it?
___
Redhat-list mailing
It looks like you DO need disc2 as well, at least for the more complex
installs.
Bill Ward
-Original Message-
From: Chapman, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 8:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: 7.0
the iso images... is disc1 still all we need
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
the iso images... is disc1 still all we need to install it?
Depends. For a standard workstation install, possibly even a basic
server install, disk 1 works. The minute you pick out _any_ options,
you'd best plan on inserting disk 2. They were planned to allow the
).
Jamin W. Collins
-Original Message-
From: Charles Galpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:22 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: 7.0
no, at a minimum you will need disk1 and disk2. A bit annoying too since
you can't leave it unattended anymore.
charles
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:21:52AM -0400, Charles Galpin wrote:
no, at a minimum you will need disk1 and disk2. A bit annoying too since
you can't leave it unattended anymore.
I did a basic workstation install (picked no options) and it worked with
just the first CD.
--
Steve Borho
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Thornton Prime wrote:
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Chapman, Matt wrote:
the iso images... is disc1 still all we need to install it?
For an extremely basic install, you might get away with only disc1. The
installer doesn't tell you what requires disc2, so unless you want to
al Message-
From: Charles Galpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:22 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: 7.0
no, at a minimum you will need disk1 and disk2. A bit annoying too since
you can't leave it unattended anymore.
charles
On Thu, 28 Sep 200
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Eileen Orbell wrote:
Have you ever burned a ISO image under Linux? If you have all you need to
do is download a ISO of 7.0 do a md5sum to determin if the image you
downloaded is correct and burn it.
In the past I have always bought new versions of Red-Hat of
I'm probably including too much info below, but hoped the answer might
be useful to some who just haven't been there yet. *8^)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In the past I have always bought new versions of Red-Hat of
cheapbytes.com or somewhere like that but this time I would like to
download it
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:20:29PM -0400, Eileen Orbell wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know where I can download 7.0 besides redhat.com
My personal favorite is ftp.wtfo.com. Reason: They also support
rsync access.
Thanks
Eileen Orbell
Software Internet Applications
Capitol College
78 matches
Mail list logo
